The coverage of the US election by “our” national newspaper, The Australian, was little short of appalling. Journalists made little attempt to offer balance and instead engaged in outpourings of hatred against Trump, primarily because he broke the sacred convention of attacking immigration, the golden calf of the elites.
Sure, Trump said that he liked sex with women, but there was little coverage of the Bill Clinton rape saga. It was mentioned, but one would have thought that rape allegations by live subjects were more important that a ten-year-old tape of a private conversation about wanting to have sex with some woman. The imbalance and bias here is so blatant that one becomes numb by just observing it.

The Australian did not learn any lessons from Brexit, and almost moronically adopted an uncritical belief in the opinion polls, all of which were defective in various ways – proved by their utter failure to predict the election results once again.  The “silent majority” of voters just don’t reply to opinion polls, or give interviewers what they want, then vote against the elites. The chattering class did not see it, and it has hit them like a punch out of the blue.

To The Age
Greg Barns and Anna Talbot do not sufficiently value intellectual freedom as an indispensable bulwark against the political correctness that so easily slides into tyranny ('Turnbull attack on 18C case based on serious error', 14/11). Laws allegedly aimed at preventing vilification and hatred have been ruthlessly used overseas in a number of nations in order to suppress honourable intellectual dissidents and revisionist historians. That may happen here one day if 18C is not repealed.

'Protecting people's rights' is not ethical if it tramples on other people's different rights; nor does it produce 'social cohesion'. Appeals to the UNO are unconvincing because that body has been tainted from its inception; and playing the Nazi card while saying nothing about the tyrannies of the Soviet Union and Red China suggests that Barns and Talbot actually have a partisan political agenda in defending 18C.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

To The Australian
Paul Keating is on weak ground ethically in advocating 'a formal document of reconciliation or a treaty' with Aboriginals ('Indigenous treaty more meaningful: Keating', 14/11). He brushes aside one obvious impediment - that such a treaty would be '200 years late.' He ignores simple facts: that the tribes here in the late 18th century failed to defend their land and that now the nation of Australia exists in its own right with full de iure status.

The interests of the vast majority of Australians will not be served, nor dealt with justly, by nefarious political manipulation that takes no account of the reality that most Aboriginals today carry in part other ancestry, often derived from the European incomers, and benefit from their membership in our nation and enjoyment of its provision of peace, security and a high standard of living.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

What is Social Credit and Why Is It So Important in this fourth industrial age?

One of the first signs to look for will be the names and backgrounds of the folks Donald Trump will appoint in his new administration. Especially his Chief of Staff and Secretary of State. I see that the President-elect of the United States of America is showing signs of “looking to old Wall Street hands” to fill some of the jobs that will be in his power to offer.
So, when President Trump has put America back on the road to prosperity, what will he do with the production surplus that his own people cannot purchase through lack of purchasing power, and to which countries will he export the surpluses in this age of the Robotic Revolution – far surpassing the productivity, along with the globalization and ‘unemployment’, of the 20th century? 

Here is one example:  American ‘Greg’ emailed the following to Canadian Wallace Klinck:
“Wally, there was a recent radio segment about Youngstown, [Ohio, USA], Steel country where mills long ago shut down.  When a French steelmaker moved in to set up a new mill, [there was] initial rejoicing, but it needed to hire only 400 workers to do production formerly requiring 20-thousand workers.  The factories come back but not the jobs.”

There are some very crude, malicious and decidedly “hateful” elements among his militant “Left” and Establishment adversaries.  We learned today that for his transition meeting with Obama he did not permit any reporters to accompany him and used his own airplane to fly to Washington.  I am sure that he is more than aware of the dangers he may face and hope that he is under constant protection of reliable security forces. 

Historically, being, or aspiring to be,  a President of the United States has been a very hazardous occupation.  I expect that some of his socialist-communist and powerful enemies may stage unruly and violent events designed to provoke retaliation which then will be used to bolster their mob-inciting accusations that he is a “fascist, hater, etc, etc.” 
Many prayed for his electoral success and now he needs the protection of God for which we must pray.  Obviously, the obsequious media around the world is very miffed over Donald Trump’s victory, which displeasure is revealed on their dark countenances even when they attempt weakly to portray themselves as being neutral.  They and their financial backers are not pleased about the prospect of their “swamp being drained."

The financial system, that is, the banking, cost accounting, and tax systems, can either serve the common good, or else it will serve an oligarchic elite at the expense of the common good.
The present system serves, to a greater or lesser degree, an oligarchic elite.

Ever-increasing indebtedness, the rising cost of living, heavy taxation, environmental damage and decay, lack of leisure, poverty and social unrest, physical and psychological ill-health, and incremental totalitarianism are the price we pay for running the financial system as a privately owned, self-serving monopoly.

To THE AUSTRALIAN
Niki Savva is denying reality in claiming that 'nobody won this election' ('When they go low, we go high - so far, anyway', 10/11). Trump won; American conservatism won, not 'left-wing populism', as Greg Sheridan suggests; intellectual freedom won, for now we will be spared the planned Obama-Clinton censorship of the internet; the spirit of reform won, for a corrupt US badly needs that; realism on racial and ethnic matters won, for most people still identify with their own folk and the principle of 'big family' deserves respect not 'anti-racist' derision; and peace won, for Trump will disengage from Middle Eastern adventurism as he tries to rebuild his nation.

'Every decent conservative denounced Trump or separated from him,' Savva adds. Not so at all. Did she not read former presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan's columns or those published by distinguished intellectual Kevin MacDonald and others in 'The Occidental Observer' or Cory Bernardi's statement?
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

To THE AGE
Your editorial ('Lessons for us all in Trump's victory', 10/11) refers to political 'disenchantment' directed against 'a supposed political and wealthy ruling class'. There is nothing 'supposed' about it; a torrent of books and internet articles in recent decades have documented its existence in minute and comprehensive detail.

A major element within it happens to be Jewish, based on the financial power of great banking families, supported by intense networking of ethnically based supporters with Israel as the flagship.
Nicole Hemmer complains ('The new republic of fear', 10/11) that now 'anti-Semitism is a genuine force in American life for the first time since the 1950s'. No, it is not that but justified opposition to the influence of a minority of Jews who have caused unnecessary Middle Eastern wars to assist Israel and who, through a hoped-for Clinton presidency, were planning the destruction of free speech by major censorship of the internet.
Most Jews are not implicated in this.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

Confession time; before turning to the Alt Right, I had “Leftist” sympathies of a vague sort. Actually, in the mid-1980s about (1984), my girlfriend at the time was a socialist type who was active in the protest against Professor Geoffrey Blainey.  All that was the turning point for that 20-year old science student.

Blainey had said something mild like “the pace of Asian migrant is out stripping public opinion.” Rightly, he seemed concerned mainly with the influx of poorly educated Asians who were, allegedly adding to unemployment. For any reasonable person that was a claim worthy of considered reflection. For this he was viciously attacked by the Left, including my girlfriend at the time, who at one protest threw an egg or something at him, which fortunately missed. But this was a wake-up call for me about the fanaticism of Leftism, and I immediately broke up with her and began my journey to the Right, which was the right thing to do.

Here’s another gender wage gap article: “Widening Wage Gap Blamed on Bias.” (The Australian, October 28, 2016, p. 5) The article says that “Gender discrimination is increasingly contributing to the pay gap between men and women and remains the biggest reason for the difference in their wages.”

The research for this is a report by KPMG Australia, which found that the proportion of the pay gap due to gender discrimination rose from 35 percent in 2007 to 38 percent in 2014.  So, are employers breaking any law by paying women less for the same work? No!

The metaphor of “the red pill” and “blue pill” is a meme from the mesosphere movement and comes from the first Matrix (1999) movie. People can remain blind slaves to the system by feeding on the “blue pill” or they can see reality, warts and all by taking the “red pill.”
Men who champion anti-feminism and a male identity movement, with a return to the traditional “John Wayne man,” use this metaphor. Some of the younger men focused on the Don Juan “pick up artist” (PUA), aspects of “game,” to seduce women, such as the early Roosh V, but most are moving beyond this now, paying attention to the wider corruption of the system.

Bettina Arndt (The Weekend Australian, October 29-30, 2016, p. 22), discusses a feminist response to the movie The Red Pill, by feminist film-maker Cassie Jaye. She intended to expose men’s rights activists, but came to see, to her credit, that these men had been unjustifiably painted as misogynists, and had valid points to make. Thus feminists began an attack on her and a campaign to stop the film being shown. There was no “human rights” funding, always available for feminist propaganda, for a movie on men’s rights.
Here is yet another example of how our culture is “rigged” and decadent. There will be no right or free speech for anyone opposing the New World Order morality. And why expect it – it is, after all, a “cultural war?”

Most of the “cultural war journalists" at this site had been busy working on a post-US election special which was to analyse how electoral and political corruption brought Trump down. But to our surprise and delight, a lot of this analysis is now only historically relevant given Trump’s heroic and epic victory, and of course, the triple whammy of Republicans also achieving a majority in both the US House of Representatives and the Senate.

We felt, given the utterly enormous amount of corruption within the American Establishment, that Trump could not get over the line; that it would be close, but the elites would steal the election. Although we were well aware of the Brexit effect given recent attempts to undermine it, we felt the globalists would not make the same mistake twice. And yet they did.
The opinion polls, with their sham claim of “statistical representation” based on samples of a few thousand, and the smoke and mirrors of shonky mathematics, were wrong! The arrogant chattering class were completely wrong! 

It’s time to defund all CSIRO climate activities.
For years now CSIRO and their UN/IPCC puppet-masters have claimed that “climate science is settled”. If so, why are Australian governments still wasting some $150M annually on creating climate scares and producing propaganda for a political war on carbon energy and carbon dioxide?
Australia should cease all government funding for global warming “research” and carbon-centric climate models and leave the honest, useful and difficult business of weather forecasting to the BOM, which should revert to its once-proud name and role as “The Weather Bureau”.
The neurotic focus of Australian politicians and their research puppets on the UN man-made global warming agenda has starved useful research into real factors that do affect global climate. These include cycles and oscillations in solar activity, cosmic rays and clouds, crustal and magmatic movements, volcanic eruptions, and the periodic changes in planetary orbits and axial tilts within the solar system.

Australia is an island surrounded by the vast oceans of the Southern Hemisphere. But CSIRO is mesmerised by atmospheric greenhouse mirages and largely ignores the causes and timing of ENSO oscillations, the amount and locations of submarine volcanism, and the timing, drivers and locations of deep ocean currents and upwellings.
If CSIRO and the government Universities cannot do such basic research in our region their funds should be diverted to the deficit, or applied to weather-proofing our infrastructure.
Viv Forbes
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
www.carbon-sense.com  
Rosevale   Qld Australia

The conspirator’s conspirator, George Soros, is one busy boy, with seemingly boundless energy for someone 85, or is it 855? He seems to have been with us for an eternity.
Running through this, is no particular order, we find that many of the voting machines used in the US elections, are put out by George Soros’ companies or companies with deep ties to him. (Breitbart.com, October 27, 2016)

If the reported claim is true, that Soros said that Trump will win the popular vote in the landslide, but lose the Electoral College, I think those voting machines need to be closely looked at by Team-Trump. This indicates that there may be widespread rigging of the US polls, or at the very least, a conflict of interest.

With Bob Dylan (Zimmerman) getting the Nobel Prize, people have been thinking about the contributions of Beatle, John Lennon, especially what he gave the “new morality.”
A good article deconstructing Lennon from an Alt Right perspective is by Roosh, “John Lennon’s “Imagine” Programmed You to Accept the Globalism Nightmare,” Rooshv.com, October 24, 2016. As Roosh points out, this song is the most open in promoting globalism and communism:

“Imagine there’s no countries,”
“no religion, too”;
“Imagine there’s no heaven,”
“Imagine no possessions,”
“a brotherhood of man.”

According to The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/safe-schools-teaching-gender-diversity-to-sydney-uni-students/news-story/f7b6e18a03f242074983a4bb9d32dfc0) “Gender Training for Uni Students,” teaching students at the University of Sydney have taken part in the sex and gender diversity training of the Safe Schools Coalition. After great controversy, federal government funding has been pulled, so the group wants to beef up supporters as much as possible to its politically correct approach to sex “education” for children.

The Liberal Member for Epping in NSW, Damien Tudehope, said that this encroachment on universities is consistent with its “Marxist approach” to social engineering.
I would say though that the cultural Marxism found in Safe Schools originated with the universities in the first place and that student teachers have already had their dose of cultural Marxism.

This is where Donald Trump will come face-to-face with the dilemma.  He wants, understandably, to restore and promote jobs and industry for renewed domestic prosperity and security but those jobs previously endangered by foreign competition are increasingly jeopardized by the rising “spectre”” of automation and artificial intelligence and he will be forced to seek another solution—as will leaders in all the industrial nations.  The various “Guaranteed Income” schemes although long active have remained moribund primarily because they have relied on tax funding, are therefore simply not financially viable and will become increasingly less so as the base of taxable income earners shrinks.  

As Major Douglas predicted nearly a century ago would happen, civilization is now approaching the crossroads where the existing financial system is proving to be incompatible with the labour displacing role of modern technology. 
It is absolutely essential that we Social Crediters selectively and vigorously approach all organizations, movements and public policy analysts and administrators who are wrestling with this phenomenon and its consequences but until more recent times were restricted from hearing about C H. Douglas’s message.

I just received an unexpected  message from a new contact in Scotland appealing for information on the A + B Theorem to assist him in delivering a scheduled lecture to the Positive Money people.  Things are definitely beginning to “percolate”.  It is incumbent upon us Social Crediters to bring them to a “boil”.
Surely, we are approaching a new renaissance for Social Credit! 
Douglas’s analysis of the price-system has provided the key to the solution of an otherwise unsolvable problem.

Melbourne’s crime wave continues. On October 25, 2016, three men “described as being of African appearance,” robbed a Toorak jewellery store. They were armed with a machete, a hammer and a gun. (The Australian, October 26, 2016, p. 3) This article says: “Youths of African heritage are being blamed for a series of violent crimes in recent months across the city, particularly break-and-enter offences and car hijackings.” (as above) The co-owner of the jewellery shop said the police are “frustrated because similar crimes were happening regularly.”
Then there was the assassination of Hamad Assaad, a “known player among Sydney’s loose network of Middle Eastern crime gangs.” (as above) Police predict further gangland killings.

So, how did Australia end up becoming just like America? Wasn’t the 1996 banning of guns supposed to make us “safe”? Instead, the country is awash in illegal guns, in the hands of the gangs. John Howard, got anything to say on this?