While the ruling elites have us busy opposing their globalist agendas, such as the Voice in Australia and climate change tyranny, everywhere, the world still itches ever-closer to the possibility of nuclear war. Russia has now put its so-called Satan II, or Sarmat, super nuke, into combat duty. The missile had teething problems, always a possibility for something so dramatic. The new missile has a payload of 10 tons, carrying up to 15 nuclear missiles, and has a maximum range of 11,800 miles, meaning that it can reach any place on Earth. And, it is destructive enough to destroy a region the size of France! Putin has said that using hypersonics, it can evade any missile defence of NATO. We would not want to try and see if that is true.

Dear Editor

Retired judge Henry Litton has written the below open letter to the Prime Minster, opposing on sound legal grounds, the Voice. It is another good piece of material to get around, because while analytically profound, the argument is both clear and readable for ordinary voters. He makes all the good points about the referendum being divisive, and contrary to liberal democratic principles of reserving sovereignty to the people as a whole and not some sector of the population, such as Aboriginals.

There is some great news, and some predictable news. The great news is that the NO side is now in the majority, with the latest Newspoll showing that the YES side has 38 percent support, while the NO has 53 percent. But, we should not be complacent about this, as corporate Australia and Big Tech intend to throw tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars, into the election to turn this around. And, it could happen, so we must fight on even harder now, just as in a foot race, the leader does not slacken off just because he is ahead. The enemy must be soundly defeated.

And, predictably enough, the Leader of the Opposition, Peter Dutton, said he will hold another referendum if the Voice fails, to make sure Aboriginal recognition gets in the Constitution. How about when we win the Voice, we lobby to get Dutton tossed out as leader?

While PM Albo denies it, being an inconvenient truth now, the Voice is intrinsically intertwined with a treaty. Previously at the blog, written documentation was given, but Rita Panahi, opinionist, has put together a compilation of talking heads showing that the treaty is what the Voice is all about. It means the loss off Australian sovereignty, and socialist globalist PM Albo is only too happy to surrender Australia. Malcolm Roberts, who does fantastic work has the link to see and get around:

https://twitter.com/MRobertsQLD/status/1698309098809463044?cxt=HBwWiMTQlZPIzZEvAAAA&cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=

Early in the Covid plandemic, the health authorities proclaimed that the mRNA Covid vax stayed in the injection site and did not migrate to organs in the body. This was refuted by biodistribution studies requested by the Japanese government, that showed that the mRNA spike proteins did in fact travel to organs such as the heart, brain and ovaries. The Australian health authorities were pretty quiet on this issue. Still, since the early biodistribution studies, other research has found that not only do the spike proteins travel all over the body, but they remain in the body for a considerable length of time.

Sometimes extreme poverty can be a protective measure against the madness and excesses of Western Big Pharma-dominated medicine. Thus, Haiti, one of the poorest nations in the world had few people vaccinated, as the nation could not afford the vaccine, and their health authorities became concerned when reports of adverse effects, such as heart inflammation, myocarditis, became known. Only 254 people, mostly the elderly, died supposedly from Covid over the entire plandemic. This is a death rate of 22 per one million people compared to the United States rate of 1,800 per one million people.

Thus, Haiti, and most of sub-Saharan Africa, where poverty prevented the extensive vaccination mainly seen in the West, and where lockdowns and masks were non-existent, did far better than the soft, brainwashed West. In other words, Covid was really a social, or rather, medical construction. If, and when Covid plandemic 2.0 comes to Australia from the present mania in New York, keep the example of Haiti handy.

The Canadian evolutionary behavioural scientist Dr. Gad Saad has published a book entitled, The Saad Truth about Happiness. The book tackles one of the oldest philosophical problems, of what constitutes the good life and human happiness. Where the contemporary world differs from the world of ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, who saw human happiness encompassing various elements of flourishing, as key aspects of that nature, such as intellectual fulfilment are satisfied, is that in the postmodern wasteland, such a nature is denied. Thus, the differences between males and females are rejected, and indeed, the concepts of a man and a woman become purely relative; hence the difficulties the radicals have in saying exactly what a woman is. The secure anchoring in human essence that Aristotle saw, is denied by those, and they dominate the world, those who champion the gender agender and transgenderism.

Conservatives have been found to be happier than liberals, because conservatives have a foundation of values, which those of the Left deny, where everything is open to deconstruction and destruction. Conservatives who are religious are the happiness of all, as they see that there is something beyond this world that gives ultimate meaning and sense to the buzzing confusion of present-day reality. Secular liberals, just live, and die. Sad, as Trump would say.

The globalist elites of the World Economic Forum have been recommending that governments get deadly serious on the so-called climate change issue, and start using the stick, penalties imposed by law, over the carrot, mere incentives, to reach the mythical state of net zero emissions. Thus, in the UK, there is a move now for new criminal offences to be created to deal with people who do not obey the new energy laws. London already has fines for vehicles found to exceed permissible emission levels of 12.5 pounds per offence, which is crippling many poor people who need a car for work and survival. This law is so draconian that people are flooding to buy old cars which have been given an exception under the London laws, and it is now difficult to get such cars, even at a high price.

But, things will not stop there. Under the new energy proposals, people who violate the regulations to reduce their energy consumption could face up to a year in prison and fines of up to £15,000! This is going to make it almost impossible for poor British families to heat their homes during the bitter cold of British winters. But the elites do not care if such people die; all that matters is their agenda.

Before we think about changing the Constitution, we should acknowledge that all constitutions are the sets of rules by which parliament, or even the local sporting club, will operate its business. They involve the procedures to be followed when conducting business. The rules are not the appropriate place to recognise the founders of the local sporting club, or for recognising nationally the people living in Australia before it was even called Australia. The proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice will instantly create division because it will favour that group over and above the rest of us. We are all recognised as Australians and hence have our “voice” to parliament. It is actioned by our member of parliament. That is the job of the MP! If the present funding directed toward the A&TSI people is not reaching the target then it is due for thorough overhaul. Importantly, this can be achieved without any special voice to parliament.

 I agree with Louis Cook (News, Monday, August 28). Do not tamper with our Constitution. Vote No!

The Aboriginal treaty agenda is not new, and was discussed by the Commonwealth Parliament back in 1983, and enthusiastically endorsed:

THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA TWO HUNDRED YEARS LATER ... Report by the Senate Standing Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs on the Feasibility of a Compact or 'Makarrata! between the Commonwealth and Aboriginal People:

The notion of Makarrata, arising from the YES side of the Voice referendum succeeding, will have profound consequences, more than even the critics have canvassed. First, consider what this concept entails. Literally the word is from Yolngu and means a spear penetrating the thigh (usually), of a person who has done wrong:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-10/makarrata-explainer-yolngu-word-more-than-synonym-for-treaty/8790452

Here is some first-hand material from The Australian on the fact that a treaty is an essential part of the Voice, and if it is passed, will be the next step. Every voter needs to know that this is not a symbolic gesture from the heart as the prime minister tells us, but the most profound and significant change to Australia’s legal frame work since federation. And, the elites want to sneak all this in under the radar, as usual. Don’t let them!

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/hero/treaty-and-truthtelling-explained-in-the-context-of-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/76d8fbb87ab5730533a5236be67d61aa

The Voice referendum is based upon the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Few voters have read this radical document which is almost a Critical Race Theory 101 essay, in woke Leftism and black arm band history. Consider material straight from the document:

https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement/

The White Rabbit Australia person has an excellent video deconstructing the Voice Truth Commission and “Makarrata,” which means treaty, among other things. The video should be passed to as many people as possible because it sums up concisely for ordinary people that the Voice is just the open door to a treaty, and vast reparations, and other horrors. The UN is right behind the Voice as its drive for the one world government of the New World Order.

The threat to private property, first seen in native title in the 1990s, and now giving to Aborigines 60 percent of the land mass of Australia, will be magnified. It is especially important to get this sort of damaging information out, since corporate Australia, and the globalists, will be tossing tens of millions of dollars to the Yes campaign, and it has begun.

Writing from the distance of the old country, I cannot but feel concern about the threat that Australians now face with the Voice referendum, and the massive backing to the YES side given by the globalists and corporate elites. It is clear, especially with the fast movement to the elimination of cash, that the Australian government is proceeding with a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), that Australia now is very much a testing ground for the next stage of the relentless march the globalist elites are making to the UN New World Order of one world government.

But, things in the EU may make the situation even worse, with the passage into law, if law it can be called, of the EU Digital Services Act. This will enable the Dark Lords of the EU to order Big Tech to censor any internet content that is considered to be “illegal,” “disinformation” or “hate speech.” The kicker here is that this includes content posted outside of the EU, including Australia, as someone in the EU may see it, and delicate snowflakes that they are, get triggered by it.

When you go to vote in the Voice referendum, there will be before you a single question, where people will be asked to vote Yes or No: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

So, millions of people will read this and think to themselves, if they think, well, what is the law, I can’t see anything? What is the law actually? And right they are. What goes into the Constitution is not the question, which would be nonsensical, even though that was what was voted on, but a new Chapter IX:

While the corporates are flooding the election area with money for the YES campaign, another great threat to the NO side comes from Big Tech censorship. It is predictable given the way Big Tech interfered in the 2020 US election. Now, Sky New Australia has uncovered that Meta/Facebook is engaging in an effort to censor the NO side. It is done by fact checkers, who are themselves checked by the Soros-funded International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), so right from the start there is a Left-wing bias. But even so, many of the fact checkers’ certifications have expired, so they are not qualified to do what they are doing, according to their paradigm.

Investigator Jack Houghton told Andrew Bolt on Sky News’s Bolt Report, ““They seem to be just targeting views of people who are against the Voice [referendum],” Houghton said. He later added that “All of the 17 Voice [referendum fact] checks were checking semantics, or slight verbal missteps or just comments from people who don't want the Voice to go ahead.” Highlighting the bias he added, “there was plenty of stuff on the yes side that could have been fact-checked.” He noted political leaders who made claims oversimplifying the legislative process.”

Dissent Right psychologist, Jordan Peterson has certainly got up the woke snouts of the Canadian establishment! But, the problem with living in such a tyrannical regime, and the US and Australia are only slightly, less worse, is that one will eventually get nailed by the establishment.

Dr Peterson was ordered to undergo re-education for some online comments. He took the matter to court, but, predictably enough, was ruled against. For making comments critical of the prime minister, a transgender surgery and the unnecessary severity of the Covid lockdowns, the court held that there was a moderate risk to the public of his comments! How exactly is there a risk, when the lockdowns led to harm to millions? The pot calls the kettle black, if that is not politically incorrect to say.

North Korea has recently conducted invasion of South Korea exercises, including the simulated use of nuclear strikes, raising the tensions even higher in the region. North Korea claims that this was a response to the Ulchi Freedom Shield annual military exercises, involving US and South Korean troops, even though it fires missiles over Japan whenever the urge strikes.

Conservative South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, is so concerned about the nuclear threat from North Korea, that the president has aired the idea of South Korea developing a nuclear weapons program of its own, given South Korea’s lack of confidence in the Biden regime. And, with a neighbour like North Korea, who can blame South Korea? Thus, the world moves ever-closer to the inevitable first nuclear bomb of the 21^st century being exploded in warfare. Once the nuclear ice is broken, there will be a chain reaction, as nuclear powers in hostile relations across the world, settle scores with the ultimate fire cracker of doom.