Oh, sweet irony of ironies. Tennis legend Djokovic was banned from playing in Australia and the US during the Covid freak-out, being unvaccinated for Covid.  He recently smashed the US Open, taking the trophy. And Big Pharma’s Moderna sponsored a “Shot of the Day,” that the unvaccinated Djokovic won. The story just writes itself:

https://summit.news/2023/09/11/sometimes-this-stuff-writes-itself/   

It had to happen; the Yes side of the Voice referendum, has pulled out the racism card, with a leading Yes advocate claiming that the No side is based upon racism. Now, I was expecting that, and I wondered if it would scare the punters. But, not so; members of the Yes side came out, seeing that this would be potentially damaging to their side and urged that respect be showered to everyone, that diversity of opinion be respected. Heart-warming stuff indeed.

At least we are seeing some on the Yes side saying that there will be no treaty, and no reparations. We know that this is false from the explicit statements to the country directly from the Uluru Statement. But, extracted today at the blog, is a great middle-of-the-road article from The Australian, that details the fine print of the Voice referendum that the Yes side does not want you to know. It needs to be given to the undecided.

Peter Swan, a professor and Mark Humphery-Jenner an associate professor in the University of NSW Business School, have put together some of the fine print details on the Voice referendum that you are not going to hear from PM Albo as he drifts around in a miasma of stifling wokeness. This article is a great one to give to anyone you know who is undecided, as it is not pushy, but tells it like it is, that the referendum is not a mere symbolic gesture as Albo is saying, but is tied up to giving substantial power, more than has ever occurred in Australia’s history, to a special interest group. The Voice intends to pursue a treaty, and there will be reparations taken from Australia’s GDP.

The Yes side is not publicly speaking about this, the fine print of the Voice as the authors put it, but the evidence is undeniable, although the Yes mob still deny it.

Climate change alarmism is being used by globalist organisations as the UN and World Economic Forum, who exert enormous control and influence over national governments, to bring in their technocratic agenda. We have seen how radical this is, with European moves to cull out farms, as in the Netherlands and Ireland, to transition rapidly to renewable energy, which is far from “sustainable” and other policies like the ending of meat eating, at least for us ordinary people. Farming and traditional culture in the West will be devastated by this. But, the elites say, such is the price to save the planet from runaway climate change. Thus, much depends upon debunking the pseudo-science behind climate alarmism. This is yet another clear illustration of the need to deal with science, or the elites will use it to deal with us. Today, science and technology are olitical weapons.

Jen Psaki, former Biden administration press secretary, responded to a Republican claim that moving away from pro-life to pro-baby, might be a better political strategy. She said: “I hate to break it to you, but if you call broccoli ‘candy,’ it’s still just broccoli. If you tie a really nice bow around a lump of coal, it is still coal under there.” By the same token if you call a pro-abortionist, a liberal, that does not change the fact that they are still intellectually challenged under the nice bow. The analogy of a lump of coal is profoundly silly, since coal is an inanimate object. I don’t thing even the likes of ultra-feminist Psaki has denied that the foetus is still composed of living cells, at a minimum.

This is another good example of the Liberal Leftist feminist mind at work; and these are the New Class elites that rule us. If we let them.

This has not taken long to develop; beginning a few weeks back with Infowars.com revealing that whistle-blowers in the US federal government were aware of the mask mandates coming back for some federal agencies, we have seen widespread adoption of masks in schools, colleges and universities, in Democrat states. Last time, the US was a leader in exporting the Covid mandate madness, and the fear is that if it takes root here, as is happening, it will spread, like a real disease, to places like Australia, once more.

Commenting on this trend,  Dr. Scott Atlas, former White House adviser on the Coronavirus Task Force during the Trump administration, has said that the Covid plandemic was “the biggest public health fiasco in modern history, and it’s continuing.” He denied tht there was any new plandemic, of risk from the new Covid Variants. He slammed the unscientific use of masks, which were largely ineffective. “To say that masks work is like saying the earth is flat.”

J.R.R. Tolkien in his essay “On Fairy Stories,” makes use of the analogy of a smudged window, as his version of Plato’s cave, to illustrate the notion of universal truth; that our vision can become distorted or smudged. He saw the use of fantasy of tapping into the well-spring of universal religious truths about the human condition, well-illustrated by his epic tale, The Lord of the Rings. Literature can help clear the window to truth.

The extract below discusses Tolkien’s story, "The Fall of Numenor,” which tells the tale of how a great people can become corrupted by the lust for power and things that they were not meant to have, leading to civilisation collapse. There is that theme as well in The Lord of the Rings, with the rings of power, and the one ring to rule them all, corrupting all men who mange to come into possession of it. Such literature provides powerful metaphors for conservatives to ponder, and of more impact than a mere essay or political treatise, as important as these documents are.

David Craig, the author of There is No Climate Crisis, (2021), has detailed that the present New World Order face of tyranny is coming from the globalist elites putting into place the environmentalist agenda, that was once the exclusive domain of largely Leftist academics. The academic critique from the 1960s, was highly critical of capitalism, seeing its pro-growth aspects as destructive, while ignoring the fact that one cannot make owlets without breaking a few eggs. And, their very lives were the product of Western industrialism, so the critique was ultimately incoherent and inconsistent.

But, the present drive from entities like the World Economic Forum, is to replace the critique of capitalism narrative with an all-out attack upon ordinary working people and their consumption, fossil fuels and meat. It is the more sinister aspect of environmentalism that saw humans themselves as forms of bio-pollution. The ultimate endgame of this is depopulation, and as covered many times at the blog, Covid critics see the vax agenda as linked with the aim of wiping our kind out.

I have mentioned this before, but Dr Mercola has done a detailed account of this: how long will the mRNA spike proteins last in the human body of those who have been jabbed? Given the array of vaccine injuries, and that many are long-term and we have not yet seen the last of them, and that the health authorities want to keep jabbing with new mRNA vaxxes now out, this could be a major concern to millions of people, if not the majority of people having had the vax, perhaps numerous times.

Research is indicting that there is no “off  switch” for the production of mRNA in the body. One study found that the mRNA spike protein was present in at least 50 percent of subjects for at least six months after injection, and the study was terminated at that point, so it is likely that the proteins would continue, as there is no mechanism for them to stop. It has been speculated that the spike protein may be integrated into human cells and/or bacteria present in the blood.   Research in 2022 found the mRNA in Pfizer’s vax could integrate into human cellular DNA by reverse transcription, at least as seen in a test-tube study.

Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, and a mouthpiece of Russian president Vlad Putin, has said that the US will soon face another 9/11 attack,  involving nuclear and/or biological; weapons. He did not specify exactly who might do this, but did not need to as the US is getting an impressive array of enemies, Russia, communist China, North Korea, and Iran. The first three are armed to the teeth with nukes, with Russia having more than the US, although up to a point the number is academic. All three are capable of launching EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) attacks that could cripple the entire electric infrastructure of nations.

As I see it, something like this will substantially differ from 9/11, being real rather than government produced, if one follows the conspiracy theories as I do. It will ring in a radical change of consciousness.

Here is some great material by Dr Frank Salter, arguing that the Voice referendum continues the racial dispossession  assault upon Anglo-Australia that has been going on since the end of World War II. I have said the same many times here, but Dr Salter has said it better. There is much material in the booklet that I will deal with at a latter date, but here is the relevant material on the Voice to ponder.

https://quadrant.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/salter-book-pdf.pdf

New York is a Democrat woke liberal paradise of political correctness. It is a sanctuary city, meaning that any illegal getting here will be treated with tender loving care, because that is what woke liberals do. So, to test this, Republican states have been bussing thousands of migrants to New York. And it is bursting at the seams, with schools and other institutions feeling the strain. The Black woke mayor Eric Adams, who has been as pro-immigration as they come, has now admitted that immigration is a problem. He sees immigration as having the potential to destroy New York.

Here is some information on a disturbing technocratic development known as “moral bioenhancement.” It seems that there is a substantial academic debate in the field of bioethics, so called, about the ethics of using technology, such as gene therapies and drugs, to alter the thought patterns of people so that they do not believe certain things. Oh, let’s cut to the chase; it is about culling out conservatives and producing mindless Leftist, using biomedicine! The black magic is not yet perfected, and various claims that things like beta blockers make on more Left, are clearly false: I took one last night to control heart palpations and today I am as Right-wing as ever, maybe more so. Still, as detailed below, academics are already supporting the idea of using covert, deceptive means to achieve this.

Clearly, this is one more threat we need to be aware of and confront in the near future.

This is an interesting one, as we see a high-ranting media elite unload on AI in the media. News Corp CEO Robert Thomson, was recently critical of the Left-wing bias of AI generated content. And the systems were highly biased as well, producing “garbage in, garbage out.” As well, the technology was set to displace thousands of jobs in the media industry.

Now, while I am no fan of News Corp, Thomson has put his finger on the issue here. It was though not so long ago that AI would have a tough time moving into the language areas, but general AI seems to be easting this up. No-one is safe, and maybe even the elites might be replaced at some point; sweet irony of ironies!

A “Christian” minister, Rev. Dr. Jacqui Lewis, made a recent tweet saying that “abortion access is holy and life-honoring.” Lewis, the senior minister at Middle Collegiate Church, claimed that abortion is a good thing to stop “forced births.” “Forcing people to give birth reveals such little respect for life and the wellbeing of everyone involved.”

The claims are profoundly unsound, as argued in detail below in a reply by Lifesite News.com. But, rather than go through the points, the most obvious objection comes from the Bible, that thou shall not kill. The unborn is not like an enemy soldier, home invader or anyone threating one; the foetus is most times, apart from rape, conceived by consenting sexual acts. In doing so, the actors should have the IQ to realise that a new life can be created. In doing so, they therefore assume moral responsibility for their actions, just as if ne was getting into a car and driving on the road. Apart from the special case of rape, here is simply no “forced birth” at all, so the basic points are unfounded.  

I almost passed over this item received via email, but something caught my eye. It was about Nicolle Flint, former Liberal from South Australia, returning to politics. She left the Liberal Party after being subject to harassment, that apparently went unpunished. It was by Leftist politicians and Left activists. Men on the Left told her that she should be raped or killed; terrible stuff. I do not know from the story if the police were involved, but they should have been.

For our purposes this shows the utter ruthlessness of the Left, who do not by any means play fair, and will do what it takes to destroy an opponent. Nasty pasties, indeed. But, we knew that.

We have been covering the European Union issue of internet censorship via the recently passed legislation of the Digital Services Act. Michael Snyder has a piece where he discusses the significance of this Act for Americans, and by implication, this applies to Australians as well. It means that woke bureaucrats in the EU will decide what goes and what does not, on the internet. It will be done by forcing Big Tech to self-censor under fear of penalties of up to 6 percent of their annual incomes. Naturally, this will panic them into massive censorship. And, as is noted, the law applies to material coming from overseas, so this is an indirect way of censoring the world.

The target is anything the EU regards as “false and misleading,” which is not defined in the Act, and is decided by the bureaucrats and policed by woke fact checkers. It will mean that almost all Dissent Right content will be eventually pulled from the web.

This has been speculated about for some time, but now the studies are being done. It has been shown that people receiving a Covid vaccine booster are more likely to contract the Covid infection than those who received no vaccine at all. This is based upon a study of prisoners in California, with subjects from 33 prisons. Yes, that is a lot of prisons in that most liberal of states. The data comprised 96,201 prisons, a healthy sample, with 2,835 cases, and 1,187 of the cases were among people who had received a bivalent vaccine, versus just 568 cases were the unvaccinated. The rest received old monovalent vaccines. Infection rates in the group receiving bivalent shots was 3.2 percent, compared to the 2.7 percent in the unvaccinated.

According to the standard Covid narrative, still pushed by health authorities in Australia of safe and effective, results such as this must be ignored as they are contrary to the Covid religion.

He Jiankui, a communist Chinese scientist, was jailed for engaging in human experimentation, attempting to gene edit babies, so that is saying something. He is a firm adherent of transhumanism, that genetic modification of humans is necessity to improve the human species, if not replace it by the next evolutionary thing. Anyway, he was jailed for over-the-top experiments, but now he is out, and doing much the same again. And in fact, he is starting to get a celebrity status with a big fancy write up in The New Yorker, linked below.

It goes to show that in out technocracy, mad science is pretty much becoming normal science, and carrying humanity with it in its flood … if we remain oblivious to it, and hence become passive recipients of its evils.

We have been reporting on the somewhat rapid moves to roll back in the Covid mandates, beginning with masks for many US federal government departments, then masks in schools and universities. Lockdowns have not yet occurred but New York, a testing ground for the Covid plandemic, is proposing isolation and quarantine camps, just like was constructed in Australia, during the mania.

The State of New York, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul and the Department of Health, are appealing a ruling last year, Borrello v. Hochul, that struck down the New York State “totalitarian and unconstitutional isolation and quarantine state regulation.” These camps were even more oppressive than ones in communist China: “It allowed the Department of Health to pick and choose which New Yorkers they could lock up or lock down, with no proof that you were ever even exposed to, let alone actually sick with, a communicable disease. They could have locked you down in your home, or they could have removed you from your home and forced you to quarantine in a facility of their choosing.