Is there any woke politically correct bs that Gates is not into? And the irony of a computer gurus funding a math is racist program.
I have been covering the dying sperm issue for some time. Once it was not discussed much by the mainstream media, but that is changing, as the problem gets chronic, and the future of humanity is at risk:
It was once common sense, but science is re-discovering that even friends are usually genetically similar, for like goes with like.
It looks like Bill Gates has become front man for the globalists in telegraphing their next moves. I guess they enjoy doing this as they know the sheeple are pretty much helpless, apathetic and useless, so they can have some contemptuous sport with them, cat and white mouse style. The next big thing is bioterrorism, so get ready; John Steele will start dealing with how we might survive the coming attacks.
Dr Mercola has put together a one-stop shop critique of the Covid-19 lockdowns, complete with the references to the literature, as he usually gives. Here is an extract giving the gist.
After reading this article by Dr Mercola about how quercetin can stimulate new brain growth, I rushed down to the health food shop, as fast as my walking frame could carry me, and bought some for $ 39.99. Fingers crossed.
The Terminator movies had killer robots, who were metal but flesh coated to fool humans, xenobots. And now, our Dr Frankensteins have moved in exactly that direction.
We know that the mainstream media is corrupt, for just one example consider how during the election the MSM buried the story of Joe Biden aiding of his son Hunter in his Chinese adventures, a clear compromise of his office. Yet, nothing. Then we have the US Supreme Court, which did not grant standing to the State of Texas to hear the electoral fraud case. Now, the same court throws out all the electoral fraud cases without hearing any. How is that justice? Only one judge stood against this tyranny.
I do not agree with all of Mike Adams’ cosmic stuff, but it is certainly entertaining, and readers might like to brew a nice cup of tea, have some hot buttered blueberry muffins, and listen.
In my pile of scientific photocopies I have Peter Godfrey-Smith, “Genes Do Not Encode Information for Phenotypic Traits,” in C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, (Blackwell, 2004), pp. 275-289. By “phenotypic traits,” it is understood the structure, size, shape, colour and behaviour patterns of an organism. These are taken by the likes of sociobiologists such as Richard Dawkins, to be caused by genes, in the sense that genes have a informational role in the production of the phenotype of the whole organism.
First, in terms of Shannon’s information theory, information exists where a reduction of uncertainty at one place correlates with a reduction of uncertainty at another (p. 277) In this sense, the presence of a gene g1 could be correlated with some phenotypical trait P1, but, the situation can be turned around, looking at correlations between environmental conditions and phenotypical traits, so that the phenotype could be seen as carrying information about the genes. So, this does not deliver the conclusions the genetic reductionist requires.
The Left postmodern view of beauty is just like their position on morality, that it is a social construction, is not objective, and in art, even a jug of urine can classify as art; anything goes, so long as it is politically correct. In fact, my son went by a small modern art centre, with weird structures out the front. A woman was assembling some monstrosity. Trolling her, he said that he was a postmodern artist working with rusty corrugated iron, which he used to symbolise Western racist culture. She was immediately interested.
The conservative position on beauty sees beauty as intrinsically connected with the good, just and the true, with that which is noble and holy, and thus having a religious aspect, which is why in ages now gone, fine art was a product of religious sentiment and expressed religious themes.
Robert Gottliebsen, “Defence has No time to Wait, with Conflict Risks,” The Australian, February 24, 2021, p. 23, makes the valid point that Australia’s main defence projects are going slow because it is assumed that there is a low risk of immediate war. That assumption, Gottliebsen says, has been proven wrong. The immediate flash point in our region is China’s increasing aggression towards Taiwan.
Recently China sent aircraft close to the Pratas islands in the south China Sea, these islands being controlled by Taiwan. The islands have no permanent residents and are only lightly defended. In response, Taiwan scrambled fighter jets. The Chinese offensive involved an armada of 11 planes consisting of two nuclear-capable H-6 bombers, eight fighter jets and an anti-submarine aircraft. Gottliebsen says that this was probably a test of Joe Biden.
The trend is to come up with increasingly absurd things that one can marry, since the Left has deconstructed marriage. So, now we have the case of someone marrying themselves, which seems to be a conceptual confusion. Anyway, the next big thing will be marrying abstract entities such as the number zero, or maybe even marrying the differential calculus. And, why not, wish the happy “couple” well. Could one marry the entire universe? Multiverse?
We are being told that once the Covid-1984 vaccine is rolled out, masks can be put in moth balls. But one mainstream media source disputed this, and there was hell to pay.
We have discussed a plethora of crises that are existential threats to humanity. But, I feel, the real crunch is the reproductive crisis, not merely declining birth rates by women following the path of materialist consumerism. The problem is deeper, hormonal.
I have long been a proponent of the idea that weather machines are being used in warfare. Sure, that was a conspiracy theory, but more what was once a conspiracy, is now a reality.
Do you wish to financially support ongoing work of the
Australian League of Rights?
You can perform a direct bank transfer of your contributions.
Bank Transfer details are:
Australian League of Rights (SA Branch)
No political movement can exist in a moral vacuum, and Australians have traditionally accepted that it is the Christian Faith that generated our heritage of representative government. While the League maintains a small full-time staff primarily motivated by Christian service, it is the extensive network of volunteers from all walks of life who form the backbone of the Movement.
The League of Rights seeks to help create a body of dedicated men and women who serve not for their own material gain, but as custodians of those truths and values which must form the basis of all successful efforts to defeat the enemies of human dignity and freedom.
The League encourages and equips individuals to independently exercise their own initiative in the service of freedom.
All Blog Posts Authorised by K. W. Grundy
13 Carsten Court, Happy Valley, SA.