Jo Nova has given her usual insightful comments on one of the main tyranny threats coming up fast, with the body of World Health Organization (WHO) regulations, including what was previously called the pandemic treaty. While we have covered this before, she notes some important updates. There has been some criticism that the regulations and treaty will be taking away not just national sovereignty but will effectively put the WHO in the clinic with you and your doctor, constraining his/her treatment options. This is still the case, but the new document, presented in complex legalese, makes it more difficult to work out exactly what powers WHO will have, or where the limits actually are.
Jo does note: “The new proposed amendments strike out the words “non-binding” with respect to WHO advice, so it’s “binding advice” now? They also strike out “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” which are apparently out-dated and dangerous terms for public health. Where the old agreement says “public health risk” that’s now going to become “all risks with a potential to impact public health” which almost certainly includes the risk of climate change, nasty language, and any discussion of the failings of vaccines or the WHO itself. See Article 3.”