A Court, Fuelling a Civil War By Charles Taylor (Florida)
In an incredible decision the US Supreme Court has sided with open borders globalists and held, 5-4, that the Biden regime can cut the wire barriers at Eagle Pass, Texas, and let the illegals continue to pour in. This is a decision that is as wrong at law as a decision can be, since the Court is aiding illegal immigration and the invasion of the country.
Republican Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana has said that the Biden Administration is "staging a civil war" by removing the barriers placed along sections of the southern border by the Texas National Guard. With this must be added the US Supreme Court as fuelling this inevitable showdown. While the court is seemingly stacked with "conservatives," at the end of the day, this is not so, with the majority being closet Leftists. This case should be of interest to Australians as a good illustration of how Leftism has penetrated law, and why a misty-eyed view of judges is absurd.
Conservatives seem to have a built-in death wish, to always appease the Left, who in turn, destroy them:
"A country without a border is not a country, especially when that country hands out benefits like candy on Halloween to the people who enter illegally. Nevertheless, since the day he took office, Biden has opened America's southern border through a combination of openly illegal activity and devious readings of laws and regulations. Texas, which has borne the brunt of this conduct, finally started pushing back. But now, the Supreme Court has indicated that the federal government may indeed be able to destroy the border, effectively destroying America.
The saga began when the State of Texas put concertina wire barriers at Eagle Pass, the most vulnerable part of the border through which hundreds of illegal aliens have been streaming daily, devastating the local border communities. The Biden government promptly sued to stop Texas's efforts to maintain its own sovereignty.
Put another way, the Biden administration desperately wants our country to be inundated by millions of people who have no loyalty to America, no education (or even literacy), no money, no sponsors, and no respect for the law. Moreover, it's entirely comfortable with the reality that the open border allows in cartels, drug traffickers, sex traffickers, child traffickers, garden-variety criminals, spies, and terrorists.
Both the trial court and the Fifth Circuit held that Texas was within its rights to act and that it hadn't violated either laws or regulations. The corollary is that the federal government does not have the right to storm in and clear away the concertina wire Texas set up on its side of the border. The Fifth Circuit, in a comprehensive decision, issued an injunction stopping the federal government from interfering with Texas's efforts to keep illegal aliens from flooding its state. (Breitbart has a stellar analysis of the Fifth Circuit's decision.)
The Biden Department of Justice promptly turned to the Supreme Court, asking it to reverse the Fifth Circuit's decision. That matter has yet to be heard.
However, the DOJ also asked the Supreme Court for an order staying the injunction; that is, it asked the Supreme Court to void temporarily the Fifth Circuit's order. In essence, the request asked the Supreme Court to say that, pending final review of the issue, the Biden government can re-open the border at Eagle Pass, once again allowing millions of illegal aliens to stream into America.
Before I get to what the Supreme Court did, one of the things you must understand about injunctions and stay requests is that the Court has to examine who will be hurt more pending a final decision: The person engaged in the contested activity or the person seeking to stop the contested activity. (That is, where do the benefits and burdens lie when maintaining the status quo.) In addition, the court must consider, on this first, superficial review, which party is more likely to win at the end of the day. Stay orders usually favor that party.
With that in mind, yesterday, the Supreme Court issued an order granting the Biden administration's stay request. It's concluded that there's less harm from letting millions of people pour illegally into America while it decides the case than there is from keeping them out of America. It also may have indicated that it believes the merits lie with the Biden administration.
Given that the court ostensibly has a six to three "conservative" majority, who were the two "conservative" justices who sided with the order? That would be Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh voted against the stay. So, what gives?
Well, the order was one sentence without analysis, so we don't know what reasoning drove the order. However, I have my own dark, paranoid theories (totally unsupported by any facts) about what happened. I've long thought that the Deep State has dirt on Roberts, and I think that Barrett is scared. Kavanaugh was gelded and will do whatever he's told including siding with conservatives when that position is ineffectual."
https://www.infowars.com/posts/supreme-court-decision-provokes-civil-war-in-texas/
"Republican Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana has charged that the Biden Administration is "staging a civil war" by removing razor wire barriers placed along sections of the southern border by the Texas National Guard.
In an X post Higgins wrote, "Media: 'Congressman Higgins, the Supreme Court just ruled in favor of the Biden Admin over the State of Texas, saying that the federal government can remove physical barriers at the border put in place by Texas. What are your thoughts?'"
"Me: 'My thoughts are that the feds are staging a civil war, and Texas should stand their ground'" he added."
Comments