Has the WHO and Big Pharma Got Plans for Us! By James Reed

In an interview with Tucker Carlson on January 5, 2024, former
professor of evolutionary biology Bret Weinstein, detailed the plans that the World Health Organization, and Big Pharma has for humanity. The two are like peas in a pod, and operate with a common agenda. Weinstein said that we were given an open view of what is waiting for us with the Covid mandates. He argues that Big Pharma was able to whip up the necessary level of fear, with the help of the media, and the actions of health authorities, such as the World Health Organization, to get the mRNA vaccines to be given emergency approval. This meant there was none of the usual required testing that would be expected of a mRNA gene therapy. The World Health Organization was complimenting all the way, and even changed the definition of "vaccine," to suit the mRNA agenda.

Weinstein notes that with the World Health Organization's forthcoming International Health Regulations, and the pandemic treaty, we will see a totalitarian one world government put into place effectively this year. The deadline is May 2024. As "health" is defined broadly in the "One Health" program to include the entire economy and all of society, the power that will be given over to the World Health Organization will erode national sovereignty. WHO can, and will, call a pandemic emergency when it sees fit. It was just itching to do this with monkey pox, but it was a fizzer. With enthusiasm for disease X, and exotic killer diseases being manufactured in genetic engineering biolabs across the world, many labs with shonky security, we are facing one of the gravest threats to individual liberty seen this century.

There are websites below for people who want to act, and act now we must!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/understanding-the-whos-plans-for-you-5566221

Understanding the WHO's Plans for You

(rafapress/Shutterstock)

By <https://www.theepochtimes.com/author/dr-mercola> Joseph Mercola
1/19/2024

How does Big Pharma persuade journals, hospitals, and government to be
so corrupt? According to this interview by Tucker Carlson, most have no
idea how elaborate Pharma's bag of tricks is. It's nothing short of an
intellectual property racket—and you'll be gobsmacked at how it works.

The video above features an interview with American podcaster and former
professor of evolutionary biology Bret Weinstein by Tucker Carlson.1
Originally aired Jan. 5, 2024, in it, they discuss the COVID-19
pandemic, "the game of Big Pharma," the catastrophic effects of the mRNA
shots, and the World Health Organization's (WHO) plan for humanity going
forward. It's an excellent interview you won't want to miss.

The Big Pharma Racket Explained

Mr. Weinstein begins by addressing what he refers to as "the game of Big
Pharma." He believed himself to be somewhat of an expert on the drug
industry, but over the past four years, he found himself being
"schooled," and many facets of the industry were not at all what he'd
imagined.

Of course, Big Pharma has a "perverse incentive" to promote ill health
as its financial bottom line depends on it. They make no money from
healthy people.

"But what I think most of us did not realize is how elaborate its bag of
tricks is," Mr. Weinstein said "and what the nature of that bag of
tricks is. To describe it, I would say Pharma is an intellectual
property racket ...

"Essentially, Pharma owns various things—it owns molecules, compounds,
it owns technologies, and what it's looking for is a disease to which
these things plausibly apply."

Once a disease has been identified against which of Pharma's
intellectual properties can be used, the industry's profits rise to the
extent that:

The disease is widespread.
The disease is serious.
Competing drugs are deemed unsafe or ineffective.
The government will mandate the drug.
The medical establishment will declare it the standard of care.

"You've just described pandemic response!" Mr. Carlson said. And,
indeed, analyzing the pandemic response is what allowed Mr. Weinstein to
identify these tricks.

Pharma, he said, is engaged in a continuous effort to portray its
intellectual properties as more useful and safer than they are and to
persuade the medical establishment, journals, medical societies,
hospitals, and government to "direct people toward drugs they wouldn't
otherwise be taking. That's what the racket is."

It's important to understand what the Pharma racket is and how it works
because long before COVID, Pharma was "expert at figuring out how to
portray a disease as more widespread and more dangerous than it was,"
and it was "excellent at portraying a compound as more efficacious than
it is."

So when COVID-19 happened, the industry was more than prepared to take
advantage of it. COVID was "the biggest pharmacological cash cow
conceivable," Mr. Weinstein noted.

A Fatal Flaw

The immediate needs of the crisis allowed Pharma to do what otherwise
would have been impossible, and that is to roll out mRNA technology at
"warp speed" under the pretence that it was the latest and greatest
vaccine technology. Gene therapies must undergo far more stringent
safety and efficacy testing, all of which were bypassed in this case.

Mr. Weinstein suspects the mRNA technology "would never have gotten
through even the most cursory safety tests" under normal circumstances,
as it has a "terrible safety flaw."

The lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are not targeted, so they can and are
taken up by any cell they encounter. This wouldn't be so bad if the
injection actually stayed in the injection site, as promised, but it
doesn't.

This was, of course, entirely predictable. Just about any compound
injected will leak from the injection site and end up circulating
through your body. The risk of systemic effects was further augmented by
the fact that health authorities advised AGAINST aspiration of the
needle prior to injection.

Aspiration involves pulling back on the plunger to make sure there's no
blood. If there's blood, you've landed in a blood vessel, which means
you're injecting straight into the bloodstream and not into the deltoid
tissue, which would help minimize the mRNA's spread through your body.

As explained by Mr. Weinstein, the danger of the mRNA technology has to
do with how immunity naturally develops.

A viral infection occurs when a virus enters a cell and tricks it into
making copies of the virus. These copies enter and infect adjacent
cells, and many also spread to other people through coughing and
sneezing. When your cells produce an antigen (a foreign protein) that
your immune system cannot recognize, your immune system assumes that the
cell is virally infected and sets out to destroy it.

The problem with the mRNA transfection technology is that it tricks
cells haphazardly throughout your body to produce a foreign protein,
which your immune system recognizes as an infection in progress.

Your immune system, therefore, starts to destroy the affected cells, and
when those cells are in your heart, brain, or other internal organs, the
result can be life-threatening. Aside from lethal heart problems, we're
also seeing a dramatic uptick in extremely rapidly progressing cancers.

"To go back to the original story, Pharma had a potentially tremendously
lucrative property that it couldn't bring to market because a safety
test would have revealed this unsolvable problem at its heart," Mr.
Weinstein said.

"My hypothesis is that it recognized that the thing that would bypass
that obstacle was an emergency that caused the public to demand a remedy
... that would cause the government to streamline the safety testing
process so that it wouldn't spot these things.

"And indeed ... the safety testing was radically truncated so that
long-term harms were impossible to detect. So the hypothesis in question
is, Pharma used an emergency to bypass an obstacle to bring an
incredibly lucrative technology—to normalize it in the public and the
regulatory apparatus—to sneak it by the things that would ordinarily
prevent a dangerous technology like this one from being widely deployed."

The Plot to Introduce Risky Tech Was Central to the COVID Response

In a supplementary commentary about and to this interview, Jeffrey A.
Tucker, founder of the Brownstone Institute, wrote:2

"The bigger picture, the ominous reality, was slow to dawn on me, namely
that the mRNA platform technology ... was central to the entire COVID
response. Without understanding that, we miss the forest for the trees.
It was the driving motivation for the initiation of lockdowns ... and
their absurd prolongation ...

"When you consider the scale of the damage to the whole society and the
entire world, all for purposes of patent piracy and fast-tracking a
technological deployment, one almost cannot imagine that any government
could be so captured and corrupt. It seems to stretch the bounds of
plausibility and yet here we are.

"Knowing all of this helps frame up some of the mysteries of the time,
such as the wild and aggressive censorship. To manage a caper on this
scale required the creation of the appearance of consensus. The point
was to prepare the way for the vaccine rollout, which everyone was
supposed to regard as their salvation from lockdowns, masks, and
closures ...

"There is a reason we haven't heard any high-profile apologies or
admissions of wrongdoing. The reason is that there was never a purpose
to do the right thing. It was an industrial takeover from the beginning,
a perfect corporatist scheme for gaining a major advantage in the wars
for pharmaceuticals and their future."

Tens of Millions Have Likely Been Killed Already

Mr. Weinstein cited research3 by Joseph Fraiman et. al., in which they
reanalyzed Pfizer's own trial data, showing there was a 1 in 800 risk of
a serious adverse event. This risk was cleverly disguised by giving the
placebo group the real mRNA shot just one month into the trial.

This was not a risk of 1 in 800 people, but 1 in 800 doses, and people
got two doses to start. Research presented at a recent conference in
Romania suggests some 17 million people have died as a result of the
shots so far. Yet these shots are still recommended for children as
young as 6 months and in the absence of any kind of emergency.

And, as noted by Mr. Weinstein, while booster uptake is now in the
single digits percentage-wise, we are not seeing a clear majority
acknowledging that the mass vaccination campaign was a mistake to begin
with. It's as though most people simply don't want to think about the
damage that has been done. They don't want to acknowledge that they were
fooled by a sophisticated propaganda machine.

But we're still injecting these shots into children, and that means we
have a moral obligation to acknowledge the uncomfortable truth that the
shots are dangerous and must be stopped.

Free Speech Is a Matter of Life and Death

As noted by Mr. Weinstein, a relatively small number of alternative
media voices were fortunately able to educate enough people about the
harms, such that booster uptake has now dropped off the proverbial
cliff. The problem we now face is that the WHO, in its amendments to the
International Health Regulations (IHRs) and the international pandemic
treaty, is seeking to gain control over all media worldwide.

If the IHRs and the treaty go through, the WHO would have the sole
authority to decide what medical truth is, and all countries would be
obliged to censor accordingly, by whatever means necessary.

Considering how crucial alternative news has been in waking people up to
the realities of COVID, what will happen if we're forced to face another
pandemic without them? You could easily say that free speech, within the
context of health and medicine, is a matter of life and death. If
scientific debate and opposing views are eliminated, the death toll from
medical propaganda is bound to be even greater than we've seen already.

The WHO's Plan in Broad Strokes

Mr. Weinstein went on to review the WHO's planned coup by way of the IHR
amendments and its pandemic treaty. In broad strokes, these two
instruments seek to achieve global dominion by the few and total control
of the masses under the guise of public health.

In short, this treaty will require all member nations that sign onto it
to relinquish their national sovereignty to the WHO, making it a de
facto totalitarian ruler of the whole world.

According to the WHO, the reason the COVID pandemic got so bad is that
nations failed to cooperate. Hence, the reasoning goes that we need an
international treaty that centralizes pandemic response powers to the WHO.

The problem, of course, is that most nations DID follow the WHO's
irrational and unscientific recommendations. Its ineptitude—whether
intentional or not—is what destroyed economies and resulted in needless
deaths.

Under the proposed treaty, the WHO will have the authority to declare a
public health emergency on any basis, even without evidence, and will be
entitled to mandate remedies that all member states will be required to
implement.

This includes vaccine mandates, travel restrictions, which drugs can and
cannot be used, and the censorship of everything that does not conform
to the WHO's official recommendations, just to name a few. Importantly,
the censorship will not be limited to "misinformation" (erroneous
information) and "disinformation" (intentionally erroneous information
and lies), both of which are at least to some degree related to truth
versus falsehood.

No, as explained by Mr. Weinstein, the most important term you need to
understand is that of "malinformation," defined as truthful information
that causes distrust in authority.

Criminalizing Malinformation–The Legalized Silencing of Truth

So when you point out lies by government officials, you're committing an
act of malinformation, which the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
now includes in its definition of terrorist acts, in addition to
spreading mis- and disinformation. This is absolutely terrifying because
"terrorism" is "a legal designation that causes all of your rights to
evaporate," Mr. Weinstein said, adding:

"So at the point that the Department of Homeland Security says that you
are guilty of a kind of terrorism for saying true things that cause you
to distrust your government, they are also telling you something about
what rights they have to silence you.

"They are not normal rights. So these things are all terrifying, and I
do think ... the COVID pandemic caused us to become aware of a lot of
structures that have been built around us, something that former NSA
officer William Binny once described as the turnkey totalitarian state.
The totalitarian state is erected around you, but it's not activated.
And then, once it's built, the key gets turned.

"We are now seeing ... something that even outstrips William Binny's
description, because it's the turnkey totalitarian planet. The World
Health Organization is above the level of nations, and it is going to be
in a position, if these provisions pass, to dictate to nations how they
are to treat their own citizens, to override their constitutions."

The Timeline

The 77th World Health Assembly, during which the IHR amendments and the
pandemic treaty are to be voted on, is scheduled to begin May 27, 2024.
The IHR amendments will only require a 50 percent vote of whoever is in
the room at the time of the vote.

However, the IHR amendments working group must submit its final package
of amendments by Jan. 27, 2024.4 If the final version of the proposed
amendments has not been properly submitted by that date, then the World
Health Assembly does not have the legal right to vote on them at the
77th World Health Assembly in May 2024.

This means we only have two weeks left to raise enough awareness about
these amendments to prevent their adoption. So please, help spread the
word by sharing the
<https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-who-deadline-is-less-than-three>
videos listed on James Roguski's Substack.

Mr. Roguski has also generously provided the world with a list of other
actions you can take depending on where you live:5

<https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exit-the-united-nations-and-the-who>
USA.
<https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4623>
CanadianPetition.com.
<https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/648609> UK PARLIAMENTARY PETITION.
<https://australiaexitsthewho.com/> AustraliaExitsTheWHO.com.
Worldwide: Click
<https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/worldwide-exit-the-who> HERE,
<https://preventgenocide2030.org/all-actions> HERE, and
<https://doortofreedom.org/actions-around-the-world/> HERE.

Door To Freedom (<https://doortofreedom.org/> DoorToFreedom.org), an
organization founded by Dr. Meryl Nass, also has a poster that explains
how the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will change life as we know
it and strip us of every vestige of freedom. Please
<https://doortofreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/The-WHO-and-American-Democracy-Easy-Print-Background.pdf>
download this poster and share it with everyone you know. Also, put it
up on public billboards and places where communities share information.

If adopted, the IHR amendments will take effect 10 months later for any
nation that does not opt-out. Nations that have not officially opted out
will then be bound by the new terms laid out in the amendments.

Timeline for the Pandemic Treaty

The pandemic treaty will also be voted on during the World Health
Assembly's annual meeting, May 22 through 24, 2024.6 It will require a
two-thirds vote in favor by the members in the room and will go into
effect as soon as 30 nations have ratified it.

Thirty days after that, the treaty will go into effect for all the
nations that have signed on. Any nation that has not signed the treaty
will be excluded from its terms. Those who sign the treaty must wait
three years before they can get out.

The most recent version of the treaty, dated Oct. 30, 2023, can be found
<https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf> here. The
Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) has been directed to produce
yet another draft before the next meeting scheduled for Feb. 19 through
March 1, 2024, so additional revisions are to be expected.7

The Good News

While the situation may appear bleak, Mr. Weinstein remains optimistic,
if for no other reason than the fact that we, the opposition to this
global coup, actually have the most courageous intellectuals on OUR team.

Scientists, researchers, medical professionals, academics, and
journalists of all stripes across the world who dared speak out against
the official narrative were ousted from their prestigious positions.

As a result, we now have a "Dream Team" of "every player you could
possibly want on your team to fight some historic battle against a
terrible evil," Mr. Weinstein said. Indeed, as noted by Mr. Carlson,8
all of these experts "now form a huge counterforce of correct
information," and they're not going away.


That said, to truly prevent this global coup, we need you, everyone,
regular folk everywhere, to speak and share the truth to the point that
you're able. Only then will our voices outnumber the voices of the
propaganda machine.

Originally published Jan. 15, 2024, on Mercola.com

References

1
<https://tuckercarlson.com/the-tucker-carlson-encounter-bret-weinstein/>
TuckerCarlson.com January 5, 2024
2, 8
<https://brownstone.org/articles/reflections-on-the-bret-weinstein-interview/>
Brownstone January 7, 2024
3 <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/> Vaccine September 22,
2022; 40(40):5798-5805
4, 5
<https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-who-deadline-is-less-than-three>
James Roguski Substack January 6, 2024
6 <https://apps.who.int/gb/gov/en/dates-of-meetings-eb_en.html> WHO
Governance, Dates of Constitutional Meetings
7 <https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr5/A_WGIHR5_4-en.pdf> WHO

Provisional WGIHR Timeline, November 16, 2023."