Everyone knows that I am a fair minded person, who calls a spade a digging instrument. So, what do you think a reasonable person would say about China’s treatment of the Muslim Uighurs? If that person was reading our pro-China mainstream press, one would be met with ignorance. But, the truth is out there, and with some struggle I did manage to find a reference to this on the ABC:
  http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-28/china-working-to-eliminate-uighur-people-detention-camp-witness/10308286

“As reports of the forced detention and brainwashing of up to one million ethnic Uighurs continue to emerge from China's Xinjiang autonomous region, the ABC has heard a rare account from a witness who has been inside a camp. Tarim, whose second name we have withheld, bribed his way into one of the "training" centres reserved for the Muslim minority, to see his sister, who was detained in 2016. She is being held in the facility outside Aksu City, in western Xinjiang (also known as Turkistan), which Tarim described as a "concentration camp". "It was April and there was snow in some parts, and I saw about 500 persons on the concrete, on the ground," he told PM in his native language, through a translator in Sydney. "And also there were about 700 or so people … in the queue to get food, and at the same time they were singing patriotic songs: I love Communist Party, I love Xi Jinping."

     Two academics have come out and presented a dry paper which essentially says that the main force dividing America, and by extension, the rest of the West, is race. Surprise, surprise, I thought that is was which is best; chocolate or vanilla icecream:
  https://www.amren.com/commentary/2018/09/race-is-the-main-political-divide/
  https://economics.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pe_04_17_valentino.pdf

“Growing antipathy between supporters of the two major U.S. parties, a phenomenon labeled affective polarization, has been well documented. One of the most compelling explanations for this trend concerns partisan sorting on the basis of a host of salient group identities in the electorate, including religion, class, ideology, race and perhaps others. We propose a narrower catalyst is at work: affective polarization is driven mostly by the increasing overlap between racial and partisan schemas in the mind of the average citizen. We test the implications of this claim using three studies. First, time series evidence from the American National Election Studies reveals the influence of racial attitudes on partisan affect has grown more rapidly than that of non-racial attitudes. Second, an original implicit-association test demonstrates respondents with racialized party schemas display much more affective polarization. Third, matches between a respondent’s race and their perception of party produce more affective polarization, unlike perceived matches between parties and religious or class identity.”

     Remember all of those rape victims challenging Bill Clinton, and how the progressives did not believe them? Remember Hillary Clinton’s response during the 2016 presidential debates when Trump brought some of them to sit in the front row? Well, the US progressives, who have moved to even deeper levels of insanity over the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court appointment, and the rolling, continuously discredited accusations of “rape,” have moved to support the idea that the accusers must be believed, by definition, because they are women, and Kavanaugh is a white male, and all white males are evil, and must disappear from the face of the Earth:
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/09/29/chelsea-handler-rape-fine-all-white-republican-party/
  https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2018/09/29/usa-today-kavanaugh-should-stay-off-basketball-courts-when-kids-around/
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/09/29/samuel-l-jackson-brett-kavanaughs-lying-fratboy/

     This double standard also can be seen in the chatterers turning to use crude anti-homosexual jokes and insults against  Senator Lindsey Graham, for giving a fiery speech defending Brett Kavanaugh. These are the same progressives that support gay marriage and other progressive causes, but will resort to hurling whatever is at hand when it suits them. They have moral credibility, no consistency, and we have cases of so-called socialists, behaving like the worst of caricature capitalists:
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/09/29/left-turns-to-homophobia-to-attack-lindsey-graham-closeted-idiot/
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2018/09/29/michael-moore-dismisses-ex-wifes-lawsuit-as-smear-campaign/

     Some who knows a thing or three about freedom of speech is Julian Assange, a person the Masters of Evil would love to put in a slow roaster, with an apple in his mouth. Anyway, in his famous last words before blackout, he said that we are the last generation to know freedom, which is set to die out like the dinosaurs:
  https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2018/09/this-is-the-last-free-generation-says-julian-assange-in-last-pre-blackout-interview/
  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-21/last-free-generation-says-julian-assange-last-pre-blackout-interview

“This generation being born now… is the last free generation. You are born and either immediately or within say a year you are known globally. Your identity in one form or another –coming as a result of your idiotic parents plastering your name and photos all over Facebook or as a result of insurance applications or passport applications– is known to all major world powers. A small child now in some sense has to negotiate its relationship with all the major world powers… It puts us in a very different position. Very few technically capable people are able to live apart, to choose to live apart, to choose to go their own way,” he added. “It smells a bit like totalitarianism – in some way. -Julian Assange Assange also predicts that AI will be able to automate hacking activities, dramatically increasing the scale of hostile activities through cyberspace.

     In the latest false news development over the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court appointment, which has generated more US news coverage than any story in recent history, progressive Hollywood archaeologist Indiana Jones   has unearthed an ancient manuscript that clearly links notorious serial rapist Brett Kavanaugh with the man responsible for raping more women than any other oppressive male, the Mongol war lord Genghis Khan (1162-1227). It seems that an ancient Mongolian high school year book referred to the great warlord as “Brett the horny honey,” whose goal in life, after murdering and raping half of Eurasia, was to live long enough for America to be created, so that he could sexually assault women at an American high school dance. The Democrats are rejoicing about this tremendous find of the first piece of hard evidence against the Supreme Court nominee. The FBI are now investigating, and believe that Khan may actually be Vlad Putin in genetic disguise, attempting to molest the pure as the driven snow, US elections, once more. It seems that everybody is being molested by somebody today. Fatherly advice for young men in the dark night of the insane:
  http://www.amerika.org/politics/protecting-your-son-from-metoo/ 
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKulpq46r3Y

     An excellent system for home-schooling children, without killing the parent/teachers in the process, Dr Art Robinson explains the Robinson curriculum for escaping the putridity:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTa5SgusO40

     I know that at times I have said that Sweden will be the first European country to slip open like a rotten melon, but surely France, run by a symbol of cosmopolitan  end times,  Emmanuel Macron, is catching up. By the way, Macron is married to Brigitte Macron, age 65, while he is aged 40 years. Wow, that has just got to be, well, “exciting,” I am sure that she is a nice person, and I would be proud to have her as my mother. My French is bad but I think Macron’s mother, Françoise  Noguès,  is only a wee bit older:
  https://www.voici.fr/bios-people/francoise-nogues

     I could not find on the net whether or not  the happy couple  have been blessed with the pitter patter of little feet, but I suppose stranger things have happened, like this:
  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/emmanuel-macron-parents-how-discovered-affair-drama-teacher-brigitte-trogneux-dating-french-a7724201.html

     I once thought that the UK was a test case for white racial genocide/suicide, but, no, Sweden has to go first to eliminate the Nordic gene pool for all time. No chance of resurrection then, and to do it, it is best to let the viral infected wipe out their own kind. It’s more juicy and delicious that way for the Dark Lords of Mordor to get off on. How else to make sense of the day-to-day decay:
  https://trad-news.blogspot.com/2018/09/swedes-signal-changing-partners-sexist.html

     A meme which features a man with his girlfriend, while looking at a more attractive woman, the “distracted boyfriend meme,” has been attacked by Sweden’s Official Advertising Ombudsman. Yes, while the country has its migrant no-go zones, rapes and grenade attacks, there is still much energy to deliver final blows to Swedish males. Changing girlfriends, or even thinking about it, may soon be illegal. As illegal as all memes may soon be with the passage of the anarcho-tyrannical EU Copyright Directive:
  https://www.wired.co.uk/article/eu-article-13-passed-meme-war

     How could there be sex slavery in California, the once land of the Beach Boys, golden beaches and sun on blonde hair, surfing and drinking beer. Who could be doing this? This shocking video tells us that all is not well in a land that makes, by comparison, Victoria, sane:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3It0uNZ0b-M

     The French president Emmanuel Macron, has been making a fool of himself posing for photographs with young, often topless men, at Saint-Martin, an island in the Caribbean. No doubt, he wanted the world to see how cool and multicultural he is, so he posed with two young blacks, one of whom made gang banger hand symbols. Oh, he was just having fun.
  https://www.rt.com/news/439989-macron-picture-finger-scandal/

     The progressive French president, who wants to make Europe a part of Africa, has previously posed with gay blacks, which shows that he does not have a discriminatory bone in his body:
  http://www.leparisien.fr/politique/macron-avec-des-danseurs-a-l-elysee-une-photo-qui-continue-a-faire-du-bruit-23-06-2018-7789650.php  
  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/20/president-macron-double-standards-france

     Conservatives were at first overjoyed; divorce rates had fallen. But, then they read the fine print; it was all due to the decline of marriage in the first place:
  https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/09/millennials-divorce-baby-boomers/571282/

“In the past 10 years, the percentage of American marriages that end in divorce has fallen, and in a new paper, the University of Maryland sociologist Philip Cohen quantified the drop-off: Between 2008 and 2016, the divorce rate declined by 18 percent overall. After accounting for the rising average age of married Americans and other demographic shifts during that time, Cohen found “a less steep decline—8 percent—but the pattern is the same.” That is, the divorce rate in 2016 was still lower than one would have predicted if the demographics of married people were the same then as in 2008. When I asked Andrew Cherlin, a sociology professor at Johns Hopkins University, how to make sense of this trend, he opened his explanation with something of a koan: “In order to get divorced,” he said, “you have to get married first.”

     I hope, like me, you love “happy” endings, because one seems to the coming our way, fast. In the video below, investor Mike Maloney reviews an awful number of articles about the coming global housing crisis bubble, which is set to bust, spraying misery and gore all over the place:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ePmC87aiaw

     Here are some of the articles, if the economic gourmands so desire:
  https://www.marketwatch.com/story/existing-home-sales-tumble-as-supply-crunch-squeezes-hard-2018-05-24 
  https://www.afr.com/real-estate/residential/western-sydney-showing-early-signs-of-principalandinterest-transition-stress-20180712-h12l4m 
  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-08-14/chart-day-australias-record-household-debt-ticking-time-bomb

     Perhaps the opening of a new mega-mosque in Cologne, scene of the new Year Eve sexual assaults of German women:
  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/cologne-new-years-eve-mass-sex-attacks-leaked-document-a7130476.html

     This symbolises the end of traditional Germany, and its replacement by a migrant state, “Eurostan,” and Germanistan”:
  https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/27/germany-rises-as-eurostan-looms-closer/ 
  https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/rival-rallies-erdogan-opens-mega-mosque-cologne-1594688409

     Regarding the Brett Kavanaugh US Supreme Court election debacle, I have been following the line that the progressives have been taking, that whatever women posing as victims say, must be believe, re rape allegations. This is utterly wrong because there have been a number of false rape accusations exposed, the now classic being the Columbia University mattress girl saga. Here is an article summing this one up, just so you know that I got my facts right on that one, since my mental decline is in full swing now:

“In 2015 the mattress girl, Emma Sulkowicz, became a global celebrity by turning what was found to be a false rape allegation into performance art by carrying her mattress with her everywhere on campus. She was protesting against Columbia’s decision not to take action against a young German student, Paul Nungesser, whom she’d accused of choking and anally raping her. Columbia has now reached a confidential settlement with Nungesser following his lawsuit claiming the university supported “an outrageous display of harassment and defamation” by allowing Sulkowicz for three years to use her mattress to hold campus protests where people openly called him a rapist. Sulkowicz was given academic credit for the performance as part of her visual arts major and was allowed to carry the mattress in her graduation ceremony.

     Does the Bible prohibit homosexuality? By that I mean, if you pick up the book and read various passages do you find an explicit condemnation of homosexual practices? Remember, this was a book written long ago by God (we believe), so it is possible that there could be a “slight” conflict between its contends and modern politically correct culture. Simply read chapter 18 of Leviticus, if you dare. Do it at night, under the bed, with a torch so no-one sees you, including spy cameras. Generally, the liberals agree that the Bible does condemn homosexuality and say, “well, too bad for the book, as gay practices are  correct and  good.” Ok, I will not discuss that,  suffering from intellectual cowardice. However, there is another approach to this debate, which rejects the common assumption here, that the Bible, especially Leviticus, does condemn homosexuality:
  https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/21/opinion/sunday/bible-prohibit-gay-sex.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion

     The reference is to a theological paper by Idan Dershowitz, “Revealing Nakedness and Concealing Homosexual Intercourse: Legal and Lexical Evolution in Leviticus 18,” Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, vol. 6, 2017, pp. 510-526. I managed to find a pre-print version on the net. The argument seems to be that some earlier document from which Leviticus was rewritten did approve of male-to-male sexual penetration. Don’t be offended for any primary school kid would have heard about that. The author discusses in detail the uses of the expression “uncover nakedness.” As well, various ancient Near Eastern texts are examined, which as I read it, basically went along the lines of Leviticus 18 as we know it, so wouldn’t that undermine the Harvard academic’s case? I could not find proof of the claim that the existing manuscript is a historical homophobic construction, which could mean that the author is wrong, or that I am simply out of my depth here. However, this guy is not, and he offers a refutation:
  http://www.gopusa.com/?p=50901?omhide=true

     One of our many American friends thought that a brief article published at On Target on the question of Q and Qanon, missed the mark. That could well be so, because we do not know much about this topic here. Fortunately, our American correspondent has brought us up to speed with some informative articles for our readers.

“I read with disappointment the article I saw in the On Target discussing the subject of Q and Qanon.  Unfortunately it missed the mark. It read more like a rehash of one of the many Main Stream Media (MSM) accounts all following the 4am talking points issued by the  Deep State propaganda team, that are professionally crafted (pun intended) to deflect citizens from what is really happening. They should be worried because Q and Trump are an existential threat to the globalist agenda leading to WW3 and the destruction of Christian civilisation. I hope to provide you with useful  information that you will share with social credit patriots. 

To The Australian        Paul Kelly's advocacy of Noel Pearson's "formulation of Australian identity" ("Let's embrace the achievements and tragedy of our past", 26/9) is not quite as sensible as it may sound. It ignores the disparity of contribution to our national make-up by the three groups. That of the British is far more extensive and significant than those of Aboriginals and later immigrants from other countries. Kelly also engages in an artificial division of those seeking to "shut down Australia Day". He refers to "indigenous groups that must be respected and progressives who must be fought." However, many "indigenous" activists are of mixed ancestry and not truly representative of Aboriginal culture in pre-European times, which is why there is considerable overlap between the two groups that Kelly wrongly treats as discrete. A unified nation can have only one national day and it cannot be the artificial creation of agitators. That is what most Australians want and why they will continue to support Australia Day.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

To The Age        Contrary to the claims by Irene Goldwasser (26/9), Australia Day can be seen as very much more than 'a constant reminder to our First Nation people of white invasion' and its 'sad consequences'. It rightly and honourably celebrates the day when Britain, our mother nation, established its authority here, as a result of which we all enjoy the infrastructure and facilities of a viable modern nation. Australians of all backgrounds should feel pride in this achievement and gratitude to our mainly British pioneers. It is untrue, too, that the day 'has little meaning for millions of people from different cultures.' On the contrary, ignoring the exaggeration there, many immigrants from non-British backgrounds are happy to be a part of the free and prosperous nation that has developed so well thanks to the religion, political ideals and legal protections that the British brought here. They are not sympathetic to separatist white-anting.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

To The Australian        The PM needs to be told that the Coalition will continue to leak votes at the next election if it does not resolutely oppose separatist campaigns on behalf of our so-called "indigenous" people ("PM told constitutional 'voice' must be priority", 27/9). Ordinary Australians are not convinced at all by the claims of some campaigners that a constitutionally entrenched "voice" would not intrude on parliamentary sovereignty. The citing of other campaigners (Mark Leibler, Anne Twomey and George Williams) in support does nothing to assuage the legitimate doubts of the rest of us. In the further future, after the ALP under Bill Shorten has been defeated, the Coalition needs to wind back some of the policies already in play that wrongfully favour "indigenous" Australians at the expense of the great majority of others. Has Scott Morrison got the ticker?
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

     I did not know who James Woods is/was, basically some movie guy who is conservative. Anyway, he re-Twitted an anti-Democrat hoax meme, which featured some cucked low T white feminist guys saying that they were staying home and not voting. Pretty funny, eh? But no, that’s interfering in the election:

“Free speech is free speech — it’s not Jack Dorsey’s version of free speech,” he told the Associated Press news agency on Sunday, referring to Twitter’s chief executive. “The irony is Twitter accused me of affecting the political process, when in fact, their banning of me is the truly egregious interference. Because now, having your voice smothered is much more disturbing than having your vocal chords slit. If you want to kill my free speech, man up and slit my throat with a knife, don’t smother me with a pillow.” He noted that his original tweet was reposted by his girlfriend and had been retweeted thousands of times but his girlfriend’s account was not locked. He said this was proof he had been singled out because of his large Twitter following of 1.7 million. “I wish this were about an unknown Twitter user so that I could be even more passionate about it,” the 71-year-old said. “This is not about a celebrity being muzzled. This is about an American being silenced — one tweet at a time.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/james-wood-twitter-hoax-midterms-democrats-actor-social-media-a8551886.html

     The last article I wrote ended with talk about the end times, and here I am with another article, further down the track on the same theme. Well, the source is from an email I received from the editor, who sits on the computer from 6 am to 9 pm everyday,  feeding  us juicy cyber  worms throughout the day. Imagine us writers to be like hungry young birds in a nest, crying for food, and like a good mother bird, he feeds us, forgetting about the gender role confusion. Speaking of the young, and gender roles, and confusion, word association would lead us to pedophiles, who, like everyone else, want to come in from the cold (and molest your children):
  http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/pedophiles-are-now-calling-themselves-minor-attracted-persons-and-want-inclusion-in-lgbtq-movement/
  http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/09/pedophiles-lgbt-community/

“Pedophiles are rebranding themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBT community, according to several reports from LGBT news sites. According to Urban Dictionary, the blanket term MAP includes infantophiles (infants), pedophiles (pre-pubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Some MAPs also refer to themselves as NOMAPs or “Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons”. These pedophiles seek to be a part of the LGBT+ community, even going so far as to make a “Pride” flag for Gay Pride Month. Many blogs exist on Tumblr showing support for MAPs, claiming that they should be a part of the LGBT community and attempting to create “safe spaces” for these “minor attracted persons”. The blog “Pedophiles about Pedophilia” also presents many sob stories of “marginalized” pedophiles in pretty pastel colors, claiming that they mean no harm and just want to be loved like everyone else as shown in such headlines as “Why Pedophilia And Pedophiles Are Not A Risk To Children”, “Growing Up A Pedophile” and “How I came out as an anti-contact pedophile to the woman I love”. This name change seems to follow in the liberal trend of rebranding things by giving them more “politically correct” names, but is the next step really normalizing pedophilia?”