Ricardo Duchesne, who has been documenting the decline, and likely fall of the West, wades in on the question of how a doctrine like liberalism, which sounds so good when first one reads about it, has degenerated, and become a malignant force, with liberal arguments now twisted to defend all aspects of woke, such as the gender agenda. He deals with Karl Popper and his arguments rejecting nationalism in The Open Society and its Enemies (1945), which is essentially a philosophical argument for globalism, based upon the liberal idea of openness. Of course, this was taken up by George Soros, and taken to its extreme. But, I think the case for the degeneration of liberalism comes from the way the Left have attempted to engage in a cultural war, where the battle grounds have been over concepts of liberty and freedom. The Left saw the internal tensions that existed in liberalism, well discussed by the British Thomist philosopher, Alasdair MacIntyre in books such as After Virtue (1981), and Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry (1990), and used them to their own ideological advantage. In other words, liberalism mutated because the Left essentially subjected it to social engineering to subvert it, much as mad scientists at present are experimenting with the Covid-19 virus. The parallels are remarkable.
At the present time many social critics of a conservative and/or Right bent are rejoicing about Elon Musk boldly walking into the twit headquarters, where all the woke blue birds are, carrying a kitchen sink, then sacking heaps of high-level dead wood. Or is that dead birds? Apparently, more heads are going to roll; these are likely the people who worked on censorship of views that were not considered woke, and acceptable to the previous management, so one should not lament their departure.
Still, it is yet another thing to regard Musk as some sort of cultural hero, on “our side.” He is not, as is documented in a Strange Sounds.com article which has video links to Musk saying things like, he supports world government, transhumanism, and all aspects of the Great Reset, being a World Economic Forum insider, or young leader. His permission of free speech at Twitter is being done to make Twitter into a one-stop shop for everything that can be done in the internet of things, so he has his agenda. We need to beware of him, for he is the popular, smiling face of technocracy.
Mike Whitney at Unz.com, puts the case that I have been making for months, more eloquently, and backed-up with all the telling videos, that the US neo-cons are itching for war whit Russia, even at the cost of a nuclear exchange. We saw this passionate hatred of the Russian leadership in Hillary Clinton, and as documented below, it seems now to be a dominant ideology in the US Deep State. If this is right, and if there is no super-conspiracy that ties up all the loose strings of information, the possibility of a nuclear exchange is not to be discounted. Yet, it is amazing how, outside of a few articles like this one, and YouTube survivalists sites, conservatives are not examining the ramifications of a nuclear exchange. Do they see this as unlikely, and hence business as usual with the typical economic material? Or do they simply put it in the too hard basket?
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-war-in-ukraine-made-in-washington-not-moscow/
Australians who may be wondering if the Covid mania is over should perhaps reflect upon the actions of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which still is promoting regular Covid boosters. In fact (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky, has had her fifth jab, as has false president Biden. And Walensky has tested positive for Covid, and gone into isolation, as one was to do in the bad old days. So, the question needs to be seriously asked, and it is not being discussed by the mainstream: How come people who have had five jabs are still getting Covid? How many jabs would it take to stop transmission? Fifty? Five thousand? Of course, the answer, as has been detailed in previous articles at the Alor.org blog is, the vaxxes are not stopping transmission, as was admitted by Pfizer that the vaccine was never tested to prevent transmission:
This has been mentioned before at the blog, but is important enough to reconsider. Russia has issued another warning of imminent war with the West if things continue in the Ukraine as they are, especially with the proposal for the Ukraine to join NATO. “Kyiv is well aware that such a step would mean a guaranteed escalation to a World War III,” said Alexander Venediktov, the deputy secretary of Russia’s Security Council. “Russian officials have never voiced a threat to use any weapons of mass destruction. Meanwhile, in Europe, some politicians openly call for such actions, even a number of politicians in the EU [European Union] do not conceal and do not rule out the possibility of using weapons of mass destruction against Russia,” Venediktov said.
While reporting on the Covid front can be depressing for reporters, with each day, a seemingly new shock, horror story, there have been some leading former champions of the vax breaking rank. In the US, Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, has now moved from strongly pro-Covid vax, to opposing the Covid booster shots, arguing that there is a lack of data, especially about potential risks, such as blood clotting, myocarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. Dr Offit joins British cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, who after the loss of his father began a critical evaluation of the Covid vaxxes.
Europeans are starting to ask, with intense angst, why Europe, mainly Western Europe must perish for the Ukraine. Few want the Ukraine to be swallowed whole by Russia, but there have been numerous proposals for peace, giving Putin an honourable exist, while still allowing the Ukraine to exist. For example, the Ukraine not joining NATO would be a major concession to de-escalate conflict, as Musk said, and was howled down for it. But, there is no compromise from Zelensky, and the assumption is that Putin is merely attempting to regain the territories of the former USSR. It is possible, but if wrong, should the world test this by allowing the US neo-cons to slide into World War III? I am amazed that even freedom movement types are not feeling concerned about the implications that this conflict is likely to bring. Do they think radioactivity is a new type of health food?
The Origins of COVID-19: An Investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, US Foreign Affairs Committee Minority Report, August 2021, has been buried by the mainstream media, and as far as I can see from internet research did not get discussed by the Australian media either. Yet, its claim that the Covid virus SARS-CoV-2 was a lab creation, leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, has displaced the bat soup, natural origin hypothesis. There has been much written by molecular biologists about this, but ignoring technicalities, it seems that unique features of the virus make its natural evolution highly improbable. The remaining question now must be: was this accident, or a deliberate release? China’s behaviour at the time, its secrecy, and actions to encourage transmission to the West, support the deliberate hypothesis. Yet today, the Chinese people are suffering even more acutely than people in the West did from their lockdowns, so there is indeed many layers to this plandemic. And, with the unfolding od adverse effects, well-discussed at the blog today, Covid’s ghost very much haunts us.
Mrs Vera West, writing at the blog today, covers the issue of the dangers of mass Covid vaccination of children, where there exists, according to virologists such as Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, risks of enhanced disease, and immune system efficiency reduction. But, the Covid vax problem also goes one step back before children, to pregnancy. Even the mainstream media have reported that in the past two years, complications in pregnancy have increased, but in general they offer no explanation, other than to sometimes say that it is the result of Covid infection itself. However, while there is no doubt truth in that, the reason why Covid has such an impact is the spike protein, and that is what is produced by the vax, and is now known to circulate in the body. Across the globe, women are reporting abnormal periods, vaginal haemorrhaging, even after getting the Covid jab. There has been a significant drop in birth-rates, miscarriages have increased along with premature births. Maternal deaths have occurred. It is not known what the extent of this is, and no doubt, the media is keeping a tight lid on it to prevent panic. The issue is alarming indeed if it continues, and does seem evidence for the radical proposal that what we are seeing here is a depopulation agenda in motion. But, at present we do not know because a lack of evidence and research.
https://www.technocracy.news/big-pharma-is-putting-all-of-humanity-at-risk-of-demographic-collapse/
Chris Knight, Florida correspondent asks what will be the next Big Thing with Covid vax adverse effects, writing about type I diabetes, observed in a clinical trial. I think the answer is in a word: cancer, or in two words: cancer epidemic. As reported below, this is not merely a rapid increase in the cancer rate in many jurisdictions, but the rise of exotic cancers, such as rare forms of lymphomas, cancers of the immune system. That too seems very odd, perhaps indicating that the vaxxes are generating a kind of self-destructive immune system response.
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/cancer-rates-are-increasing-and-may
By way of Covid criticisms not as much hell fire and brimstone is heaped upon Moderna as Pfizer by the critics. Yet, there is a story to be told. Like Moderna admitting that its mRNA Covid vaccine caused a case of Type 1 diabetes in a 1-year-old girl in its clinical trial, which was vaccine related. The immediate question striking me is exactly how did the vax cause this, what was the molecular mechanism involved? Type 1 diabetes has not been a significantly recorded adverse effect, so it is odd. The Covid vaxxes never cease to surprise one. Who know what next is in the wings waiting to come on full stage.
Well, it is a start. During a press conference, Rebel News reporter Selene Galas asked newly elected Danielle Smith if she plans to abide by her campaign promise to apologize to those who were prosecuted for Covid restrictions as well as grant them amnesty. Smith was sworn in as Alberta, Canada’s new Premier on October 11, after having won the election for United Conservative Party Leadership. During her campaign, Ms. Smith expressed her opposition to Covid mandates and pledged to do away with them as premier.
A recent study by a research team lead by leading virologist Dr David Ho, has concluded that the new mRNA vaxxes from Moderna and Pfizer produced fewer antibodies in subjects than did the previous shots used as a booster. Compared to people who had Omicron from an infection, there was less antibodies once more. These vaxxes were approved only with testing on a few mice, so maybe these vaxxes should be kept for mice only!
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-new-omicron-specific-mrna-covid
There has been much speculation about strange structures inside the Covid vaxxes, with claims about weird nanotechnology. Unfortunately, there has been no real rigorous experimental investigation of the chemical nature of the vaxxes. However, here is some recent material from a reputable site which does describe the work done by Australian researcher Dr David Nixon. He found, under microscopic examination, square shaped objects which grew rapidly, and the growth was only stopped when shielded by a Faraday bag. So, was this contaminated samples, or are all the mRNA vaxxes like this? It is utterly shocking that questions like this do not get urgent examination by university biochemistry departments, but the reason why is obvious, the same reason universities, with a few exceptions adopted a vaccinate or get out policy.
The details may be somewhat complex, but the message is clear, that the mass Covid vax program for children has dangers that have simply not been considered. Children have a very low risk of death and serious injuries from any variant of Covid. But, equally as important, children have a developing immune system, and the mRNA vaxxes may subvert the innate immune system (this being the first line of defence against disease, such as tears and enzymes in skin and mucus), and this development is necessary before any vaccines are given. It is hypothesised that if this occurs, there may be vulnerabilities to similar types of pathogens, as well as autoimmune disease. Antibody dependent enhancement may occur. Virologists such as Dr Geert Vanden Bossche see a new Covid vax disaster in the wing, affecting the next generation. It would seem something to be mighty concerned about, yet the vax rollout continues.
News.com.au had a poll of more than 50,000 respondents over the Covid freak-out. The striking message is this, and I quote: “More than half of respondents either said they regret getting vaccinated, or were unvaccinated and happy with their decision. Only 35 per cent out of more than 45,000 people said they were vaccinated and would make the same decision again.”
It is almost certain, if World War III does not bring in the Great Reset New World Order, that there will be yet another plandemic, especially given unrestrained gain-of-function research being conducted in what are bioweapons labs. Something will get out, intentionally or accidentally, and be sure that this time it will not be relatively mild like Covid. Something with real viral teeth will see people rush to be locked up again. And note that China is still going through rounds of Covid lockdowns, with millions still under lock and key, as a show of World Emperor Xi’s might. Chinese youth are despairing:
Environmentalists, like the socialists of the 1960s, like to have a stock answer to their Big Things. For the socialists, it was over-throwing capitalism, and the revolution was to do it all; an utter historical failure, if centralised tyranny was not an objective. But for the environmentalists of today, the issue is a so-called climate crisis, and it is to be met by renewables. And, the idea is not to be too unpopular with the masses at first, taking away everything, so instead of walking, they get electric cars. But an essential part of electric car batteries is lithium, and it comes at a real environmental cost. There is pollution from the mining and extraction stage, right up to disposal of used batteries, along with many safety issues, as concisely detailed below. Apart from that, there is the issue of where the electricity comes from, and these cars chew up plenty of that!
https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/renewable/the-environmental-impact-of-lithium-batteries/
Aussie farmers take note, because the scene is being set for an attack upon farming right throughout the West in the name of the climate change conspiracy. The Netherlands is a test case for this, with a forced-buy up of farms occurring, with hundreds of farms being sold at fire-sale prices. While we have no hard evidence at the moment, it is rumoured that the communist chinses will be the ultimate winners here, buying the farms from the government.
https://expose-news.com/2022/10/17/netherlands-land-grab-government-to-seize-600-farms/
Here is Tabletmag.com, a mainstream media blog, saying what many Covid vax critics have said, that the vaxxes simply did not prevent transmission, and this was known in the beginning. Hence, the foundations of the Covid mandates were flawed. But do not expect any apologies from Australian politicians any time soon.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/vaccines-never-prevented-transmission-covid-alex-gutentag
“In late 2021 and early 2022, it was commonplace for journalists and public intellectuals to demonize and shame “the unvaccinated,” a group that in the United States was disproportionately low income. The New York Times ran pieces like “I’m Furious at the Unvaccinated,” and “Unvaxxed, Unmasked and Putting Our Kids at Risk.” The Los Angeles Times published a column titled “Mocking anti-vaxxers’ COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes—but may be necessary.” An opinion piece called “The Unvaccinated Are a Risk to All of Us” appeared in Bloomberg, and The Washington Post printed a piece called “Macron is right: It’s time to make life a living hell for anti-vaxxers.”
CNN’s Don Lemon commented that people refusing the vaccines were being “idiotic and nonsensical.” He argued that it was time to “start shaming them” or “leave them behind.” Noam Chomsky, a self-described libertarian socialist, said unvaccinated people should remove themselves from society and be “isolated.” Asked how they would get food that way, he answered, “Well actually, that’s their problem.”
In Canada, columnists for the Toronto Star proclaimed, “Vaccine resisters are lazy and irresponsible—we need vaccine passports now to protect the rest of us” and “The unvaccinated cherish their freedom to harm others. How can we ever forgive them?” In the U.K., the Daily Mail contended, “It’s time to punish Britain’s 5 million vaccine refuseniks,” and Piers Morgan, a British presenter on TalkTV, suggested that unvaccinated people should not be allowed access to the country’s National Health Service.
Internationally, several politicians threatened to reimplement restrictions and told the public that “the unvaccinated” were at fault. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said unvaccinated people “are very often misogynistic and racist,” and asked, “Do we tolerate these people?” President Joe Biden said that his “patience [was] wearing thin” and that we needed to “protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers.” Michael Gunner, chief minister of the Northern Territory in Australia, stated that even if you are vaccinated, “if you are anti-mandate, you are absolutely anti-vax.” French President Emmanuel Macron declared that 5 million French people who remained unvaccinated were “not citizens.”
Across parts of the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe, unvaccinated people were fired from their jobs, excluded from higher education, banned from many sectors of public life, denied organ transplants, and even punished by judges in probation hearings and child custody cases. Meanwhile, COVID cases continued to rise in many highly vaccinated countries with vaccine passports and other restrictions in place.
Vaccine mandates were mainly rationalized through the belief that the higher the rate of vaccination, the less the virus would spread. For example, during oral arguments for Biden’s health care worker mandate, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Elena Kagan claimed that health care workers had to get vaccinated “so that you’re not transmitting the disease.” But recently, on Oct. 10, 2022, a Pfizer spokesperson told the European Parliament that the vaccines had never actually been tested for preventing transmission. While this was presented on social media as “breaking news,” the fact that the vaccines were not tested for this purpose has been documented extensively ever since Pfizer and Moderna received their original Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).
During the Dec. 10, 2020, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) meeting when the first mRNA vaccines were authorized, FDA adviser Dr. Patrick Moore stated, “Pfizer has presented no evidence in its data today that the vaccine has any effect on virus carriage or shedding, which is the fundamental basis for herd immunity.” Despite the data presented for individual efficacy, he continued, “we really, as of right now, do not have any evidence that it will have an impact, social-wide, on the epidemic.” The FDA EUA press release from December 2020 also confirms that there was no “evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-COV-2 from person to person.”
Simply put, the reason many people believed the vaccines stopped transmission was because government officials and media outlets across the Western world were either careless with their words or did not tell the truth. In 2021, for instance, Director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Rochelle Walensky claimed that vaccinated people “do not carry the virus,” and Dr. Anthony Fauci said they would become “dead ends” for the virus. Any speculation that the vaccines significantly reduced transmission was based on limited results from independent studies and the false assumption that the vaccine would prevent infection. Without adequate evidence, vaccination campaigns called on people to get vaccinated not just for their own protection, but to help “protect others” and “save lives.”
Meanwhile, social media companies coordinated with the Biden administration to censor dissent. Many people who asked questions about efficacy or safety risked banishment from Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube. Now, however, as more and more studies come out, it is increasingly clear that some of the information these companies censored was true.
For anyone content with their vaccination status, this might not be a big deal. Yes, the vaccine information that was provided in 2021 wasn’t entirely accurate, but you might still feel that getting vaccinated was the right decision. However, being misinformed about potential benefits and risks is an enormous deal for, say, a male college athlete who got vaccinated because he wanted to protect his elderly family members, but who then developed myocarditis. Telling him that this is fine because “there was so much unknown” is probably not much of a consolation, especially since his decision to get vaccinated was never going to protect his family members in the first place, and the vaccine manufacturers were given blanket immunity from liability.
It is one thing for the pharmaceutical companies, the Biden administration, the CDC, and the media to intentionally or unintentionally mislead the public; but it is another thing entirely for them to do this while government agencies actively coordinated to suppress alternative views or inconvenient data. While executives and bureaucrats may excuse their errors by claiming that “the science changed,” the public has every right to demand better. Science is the process of discovery through observation and experimentation; of course it changes. That’s why “settled science” is obviously a political, not a scientific term, and why anyone should be able to publicly question scientific consensus at any time. Instead of allowing for debate, political and bureaucratic officials conducted a campaign of mass censorship and coercion. This effectively undermined the principle of informed consent and has resulted in a scandal affecting millions of people.
It was not until August 2022 that the CDC issued guidance that called for vaccinated and unvaccinated people to no longer be subjected to different testing or quarantine protocols. To justify this change in guidance, the CDC cited the protection provided by previous infection as well as breakthrough infections. Yet studies had already shown by the fall of 2021 that the vaccines did not prevent infection, that natural immunity was at least as protective, that vaccinated people had similar viral loads to unvaccinated people, and that vaccinated people had a role in transmission.
The CDC Is Breaking Trust in Childhood Vaccination
The Russians are saying that Z and NATO are cooking this up; “our” side says it’s the Ruskies. But, there could be a dirty radioactive bomb somewhere in the pipeline of war. It will certainly shake things up, so to speak. If all this is true, then the world is itching ever-closer to a nuclear World War III, which may not be something the economic reductionists have considered.
