The idea of an Australian rule of law, is that there was supposed to be one set of laws for everyone, not a distinct set of laws for some ethno-racial group, even if indigenous … for where will this end – sharia law? It is coming.
  https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-84/legal-recognition-sharia-law
  https://vision.org.au/radio-show/20twenty/the-push-for-sharia-law-in-australia/
  http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/34-1-2.pdf
  https://amp.abc.net.au/article/12463602

“Question time was a mess as both major parties traded insults over whether taxpayers' money had been wasted on a Lego sticker in the foyer of the Queensland Children's Hospital. Looking down from the public gallery was a group of about 20 Torres Strait Islander elders and family, politely listening to the ruckus below. This jarring scene suddenly came to an end when question time concluded, and the only Torres Strait Islander Member of Parliament, Labor's Cynthia Lui, rose to her feet. Instead of sarcastic giggles and shouting, there was respectful silence across the chamber, the Torres Strait Islanders in the gallery all stood as a mark of respect for what was about to unfold — and then the tears started flowing. For the first time in Australian history, a standalone bill had been introduced to incorporate traditional lore into official law, recognising the Torres Strait Islander cultural practice of adoption and child rearing. "This has been an incredibly long journey," Ms Lui told Parliament. "This bill provides legal recognition of an ancient, sacred and enduring child-rearing practice and integral part of Torres Strait Islander practice since time immemorial." The practice — known as Kupai Omasker — allows for a child to be adopted by a relative or community member for a number of reasons that can differ between the region's dozens of different island cultures. But while it can strengthen community ties, it can also lead to complications when dealing with Government, creating problems with driving licences, passports and any other interaction with authorities. "As a child, I wondered why as Torres Strait Islanders we do not publicly discuss our traditional child-rearing practice," Ms Lui said. Visibly moved by the importance of the occasion, the Member for Cook struggled but eventually succeeded in delivering her most powerful words.

     What about Black slave owners, and worse, those blacks that sold the slaves to the slave traders in the first place? Here is one response to what looks like becoming a real moral dilemma … no, not really, since the entire narrative is controlled and no recalcitrant evidence will ever enter the major debate, or be seriously addressed. Whitey is eternally guilty, for everything.
  https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-53444752

“Nigerian journalist and novelist Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani writes that one of her ancestors sold slaves, but argues that he should not be judged by today's standards or values. My great-grandfather, Nwaubani Ogogo Oriaku, was what I prefer to call a businessman, from the Igbo ethnic group of south-eastern Nigeria. He dealt in a number of goods, including tobacco and palm produce. He also sold human beings. "He had agents who captured slaves from different places and brought them to him," my father told me. Nwaubani Ogogo's slaves were sold through the ports of Calabar and Bonny in the south of what is today known as Nigeria. People from ethnic groups along the coast, such as the Efik and Ijaw, usually acted as stevedores for the white merchants and as middlemen for Igbo traders like my great-grandfather. They loaded and offloaded ships and supplied the foreigners with food and other provisions. They negotiated prices for slaves from the hinterlands, then collected royalties from both the sellers and buyers. About 1.5 million Igbo slaves were shipped across the Atlantic Ocean between the 15th and 19th Centuries. More than 1.5 million Africans were shipped to what was then called the New World - the Americas - through the Calabar port, in the Bight of Bonny, making it one of the largest points of exit during the transatlantic trade. It would be unfair to judge a 19th Century man by 21st Century principles. Assessing the people of Africa's past by today's standards would compel us to cast the majority of our heroes as villains, denying us the right to fully celebrate anyone who was not influenced by Western ideology. Igbo slave traders like my great-grandfather did not suffer any crisis of social acceptance or legality. They did not need any religious or scientific justifications for their actions. They were simply living the life into which they were raised. That was all they knew.”

     Let’s see; the Nazi’s used guns, mathematics and science, and ate food, so all of that must be racist, eh, so ban it? Thus, the latest Trump Derangement Syndrome tantrum has been over a T-shirt with an eagle supposedly being a Nazi symbol:
  https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/07/11/fact-check-trump-2020-campaign-shirt-design-similar-nazi-eagle/5414393002/

“The Trump campaign pushed back hard on this idea. “This is moronic. In Democrats’ America, Mount Rushmore glorifies white supremacy and the bald eagle with an American flag is a Nazi symbol. They have lost their minds," Tim Murtaugh, Trump 2020 communications director, said in an email to USA TODAY.

     This shows the level of anarcho-tyranny we now have when legitimate, and correct research get retracted because it just so happens to knock over the latest sacred cow of the pc establishment, namely that there is no police bias against Blacks:
  https://www.zerohedge.com/political/authors-study-finding-no-bias-police-killings-ask-retraction
  https://retractionwatch.com/2020/07/06/authors-of-study-on-race-and-police-killings-ask-for-its-retraction-citing-continued-misuse-in-the-media/#more-119906

“The authors of a study which found no racial bias in police shootings asked for the study to be retracted.  The main findings were:

     As we have seen, Douglas had as early as 1924, in Social Credit, warned of the impending disintegration of Civilisation under prevailing finance-economic policies. The Great Economic Depression of the thirties prepared the way for the Second World War, both events being predicted by Douglas. The rapid expansion of the Social Credit Movement throughout the English-speaking world, including the U.S.A. during the Depression years, and the serious threat to the Credit Monopolists with the direct challenge in Alberta, was met in part by a diversion in the form of what came to be known as 'Keynesian Economics.' As Douglas said, John Maynard Keynes was an able man. He not only conceded that the banking system creates all new credits, but by inference in his major work, 'The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money', admitted that Douglas was right concerning a deficiency of purchasing power. The Keynes solution was not to recommend that the individual gain access to his own inherited credit as a right, but that depression conditions should be overcome with an expansion of credit to finance deficit budgets. This would enable Governments to "stimulate" the economy by "pump-priming." It would, of course, increase centralised control over the individual. And Keynes did admit that one result would be inflation, but this could be "controlled." Keynesian type "money-reforms," which Hitler and Mussolini had introduced, were offered to desperate people as the only answer to major depressions. Marxist theoreticians like John Strachey welcomed Keynesian policies of "controlled inflation" because they must inevitably undermine stable society. Consider the state of industrial societies today, as inflation produces increasing confrontations between employers and employees. In a little-publicised attempt to help avert the threatened Second World War, Douglas at one stage made an approach to Hitler, suggesting that if he were genuine in his anti-Judaic sentiments, he would end the policy of "full employment" which required Germany to strive to "export or perish." But Hitler, a paranoiac, was a product of the will-to-power philosophy.

The result was, as Douglas said, that by "allowing himself to be put in ostensible control of powers greater than himself" Hitler was at the mercy of those who put him there. When the Second World War started, Douglas expressed the view that the work of the Social Credit Movement would not be lost. Early in the war he predicted that the real objectives of the war were the establishment of an International Police State, the restoration of the Gold Standard and the Debt system, the "elimination of Great Britain in the cultural sense, and the substitution of Jewish-American ideals," and "The establishment of the Zionist State in Palestine as a geographical centre of World Control, with New York as the centre of World Financial Control." In an article in The New Age of January 14, 1932, 'The International Idea,' Douglas examined the reasons for the campaign to establish the World State: "there is a perfectly straightforward and practical explanation of this propaganda for internationalism, and for practical purposes one does not need to look further. Hardly a day passes without a leading article in The Times or other papers of the same type of interest, remarking, as though it were axiomatic that the world is one economic unit, and that no adjustment of the present discontents can be expected which does not proceed from international agreement. These journals are ably seconded by High Clerics. This opinion, you will notice, is never argued; it is always stated as though it were obvious to the meanest intellect, which is, in fact, just about what it is . . . the simplest explanation of this is that if you can make a subject large enough and involve a sufficiently large number of people in the solution of it, you can rest assured that you will never get a solution. A democracy of a thousand voters can be personally approached and convinced on any subject within a reasonable period of time, but if you enlarge the franchise to include everyone over twenty-one in a population of 45,000,000 you can be reasonably sure that any general conclusion at which it will arrive, it will arrive at twenty-five years after that conclusion ceases to be true. If you can superimpose upon that by means of a controlled Press, Broadcasting, and other devices of a similar nature, something that you call 'public opinion' (because it is the only opinion which is articulate) you have a perfect mechanism for a continuous dictatorship, and moreover, it is the form of dictatorship which is fundamentally desired by the collectivist mentality - a dictatorship which has power without responsibility."

     The new anti-white inquisition is in full battle mode, so watch out if you are anybody, saying anything, which I am not:
  https://www.sbs.com.au/news/cambridge-university-historian-quits-amid-fury-over-his-slavery-was-not-genocide-claims

“A British royal historian who said slavery was not genocide has quit his honorary position at Cambridge University and been dropped by his publisher HarperCollins. The comments from Professor David Starkey came during a period of soul searching in Britain over its colonial past. The Black Lives Matter movement that gained momentum after the death of George Floyd in US police custody in May saw the statue of a major slave trader dumped in an English harbour as protests hit cities across the UK. Mr Starkey is an expert on Britain's Tudor period - a time in the 1500s when the slave trade was growing as European colonies across the Caribbean and the Americas expanded. He said in a 30 June online interview with the right-wing UK commentator Darren Grimes that the BLM movement represented "the worst side of American black culture". "Slavery was not genocide. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many damn blacks in Africa or in Britain, would there? An awful lot of them survived," Mr Starkey said. "We had Catholic emancipation at pretty much exactly the same time that we got rid of slavery in the 1830s. We don't go on about that because it's part of history, it's a question that's settled," he added. The remarks prompted Sajid Javid - a former finance and interior minister who has talked about how his Pakistani father faced discrimination after coming to Britain - to call Mr Starkey a racist. "We are the most successful multi-racial democracy in the world and have much to be proud of," Mr Javid tweeted on Thursday. "But David's racist comments ('so many damn blacks') are a reminder of the appalling views that still exist." Mr Javid's tweet was picked up by British media and Cambridge University's Fritzwilliam College accepted Mr Starkey's resignation the next day. Canterbury Christ Church University in southeastern England also terminated Mr Starkey's contract as a visiting professor. "His comments are completely unacceptable and totally go against our university and community values," the university said in a tweet. HarperCollins UK called Mr Starkey's views "abhorrent".”

     With the massively changes environment, following the corona freak out, then the worldwide race riots, and destruction of all things white, there is a change in thought, with once conservatives, now thinking along survivalist lines. The US is ahead of the curve, having suffered much more damage than other countries, but we have yet to see in Australia what happens when here are no jobs, and the Centrelink mother’s milk bonanza safety net is taken away. I expect home invasions will go through the roof, as some home invaders no doubt will go in breaking in.
  https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/07/welcome-to-year-1-of-the-after-floyd-era/

“And now that we are in Year 1 AFE (After-Floyd Era), we must all realize that the United States has been irrevocably damaged, like the Titanic moments after it had been sliced open by the iceberg. Yes, it will stay afloat for a while, but it’s only a matter of time before it sinks and takes a tragically large number of people down with it. A coalition of radical Leftists and racially-vindictive non-whites have hijacked the Democratic Party, burned and looted our cities, torn down our statues, and vowed to destroy the current system and replace it with a racially-charged form of communism. These people are well-funded, organized, violent, and ruthless. Meanwhile, Hollywood, academia, and the mainstream media — the traditional enemies of the Right — root them on. There is no coexisting with these people, no compromise we can reach. How can you with people who don’t recognize your rights and wish only to kill or subjugate you? How can you, with people who use anti-racism or anti-white supremacy as excuses to promote militant black or non-white supremacy? How can you, with people so obsessed with fighting fascism that they justify totalitarianism? These people are not only violent, dangerous, and evil. They also have no standards. Objectively, they stand for nothing — except maybe for nihilism. If things continue unchecked, there will be war. Either Trump wins reelection in November, and they attack, or Trump doesn’t win in November, and they attack. And they won’t stop.”

     Keep up the good work in maintaining peaceful racial relations, Yusra Khogali. And, good to know what you folks really think about us.
  https://torontosun.com/2017/02/11/black-lives-matter-co-founder-appears-to-label-white-people-defects/wcm/2748a714-f567-4344-8c08-decfe73d1e52
  https://www.mediaite.com/online/black-lives-matter-leader-white-people-are-sub-human-genetic-defects/

“The co-founder of the Toronto chapter of the Black Lives Matter protest movement has come under scrutiny in recent days for an old Facebook post that declared white people were genetically inferior to their black peers. “Whiteness is not humxness,” wrote Yusra Khogali, in a now-deleted post (using gender-neutral alternative spelling). “In fact, white skin is sub-humxn. All phenotypes exist within the black family and white [people] are a genetic defect of blackness.” Khogali proceeded to go on an extended pseudoscientific rant about the benefits of dark skin, according to The Toronto Sun. “Melanin enables black skin to capture light and hold it in its memory mode which reveals that blackness converts light into knowledge,” she claims at one point. “Melanin directly communicates with cosmic energy.” “White [people] are recessive genetic defects. This is factual,” she claimed, nonfactually. Khogali made the Facebook post months ago, but her comments resurfaced after she declared Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau “a white supremacist terrorist,” earning her criticism from liberal allies.

     From an email sent to me:

“DYSTOPIAN LOGIC......   We are living in a Bizarre World:

     Multiculturalism in the West was about the ethno-racial replacement of primarily Anglo-Nordic populations through immigration, allowing the population numbers of these once minority ethnic groups to rise, while the Anglo population decreased. Thus, Australia has gone from about 97 percent Anglo-Celtic at Federation, to who know what today, maybe 30 percent. Philosophically multiculturalism embraced relativism and particularism, arguing that Western culture was not universal, but that all cultures and values are equal, except Anglo culture which is inferior and in need of replacement, which we are seeing happening in real time in the US presently. Now, this scam was only possible because Anglos accepted universalism, and moral principles arising from that, passively allowing their displacement because of extreme individualism, universalism, and deracination. But, now at the point of ethno-racial extinction, it is surely time to rethink this. This paradox of multiculturalism is aptly summarised by Eric Kaufmann:
  https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/02/populism-identity-politics-why-they-rise-in-tandem/

“Right-wing populism and left-wing identity politics have risen in tandem since 2013. Why? The connecting thread is the contradictions of multiculturalism, which encourage a “common enemy” form of minority identity while repressing even moderate expressions of majority identity. The former produces antagonistic identity politics on the left, while both contribute to populist blowback on the right. In the high culture, the advent of social media helped the cultural Left experience its Third Great Awakening, matching the waves of enthusiasm of the late ’60s and late ’80s. Meanwhile, multiculturalism’s half-century sway has presided over profound ethnic shifts, producing mounting conservative discontent. By narrowing the space for debating immigration, progressive taboos prevented mainstream liberals and conservatives from reaching a settlement on the issue. We are now reaping the results. Multiculturalism, which originated among small circles of bohemian intellectuals in the 1910s, came to be established in the elite institutions and mass culture of Western societies from the mid-1960s. Once ascendant, these values created new taboos that drew the boundaries of acceptable debate. These frowned on any expression of a national identity in which the ethnic majority was accorded a prominent role. Since slowing the rate of ethnocultural change is a primary motive for restrictionists, and this was viewed as beyond the pale, the desire to reduce immigration was considered racist. Second, multiculturalism, as its name suggests, encouraged minority groups to celebrate a politicized version of their identity. At multiculturalism’s heart, therefore, lies a contradiction: White majorities are compelled to be cosmopolitan, urged to supersede their ascribed identity. Minorities are enjoined to do the reverse.”

     Don’t get me wrong; slavery is morally evil, of course. But, given that it happened, and given that all Whites are now taken to be responsible, we had better understand what the pro-slavers argued, you know, for the historical record, because we will probably be executed over it at some point in the non-white future. Afterall, if we are now criminals for something we did not do, we might as well know about the nature of the crime.    Apparently one of the major pro-slavery texts from the American South was by George Fitzhugh (1806-1881), Sociology for the South, or, The Failure of Free Society Richmond, Va.: A. Morris, 1854. In that he said: “Men are not 'born entitled to equal rights!' It would be far nearer the truth to say, 'that some were born with saddles on their backs, and others booted and spurred to ride them,' - and the riding does them good."; and that the Declaration of Independence "deserves the tumid yet appropriate epithets which Major Lee somewhere applies to the writings of Mr. Jefferson, it is, 'exhuberantly false, and arborescently fallacious.'" No question about it, he was a classic racist, fully against Blacks. But, he also believed that Yankees, if enslaved young, could make equally as good slaves!
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Fitzhugh
  https://docsouth.unc.edu/southlit/fitzhughsoc/summary.html

“George Fitzhugh was born November 4, 1806 in Prince William County, Virginia to an established southern family in financial decline. His physician father, also named George Fitzhugh, and his mother, Lucy Stuart, would later struggle as small-scale planters when the family moved to a plantation near Alexandria, Virginia. Young George was then six years old. Though he attended a local field school, Fitzhugh was largely self-educated. In 1829 he married Mary Metcalf Brockenbrough and moved near Port Royal, Virginia, where he had obtained a small plantation through marriage and practiced law. Fitzhugh subsequently worked as a law clerk in Washington, D.C. (1857-1858) at the office of Attorney General Jeremiah Sullivan Black in the land claim department. Relocating to Richmond in 1862, he also clerked for the Confederacy's Treasury Department. Following the Civil War, Fitzhugh was appointed a judge in the Freedman's Court (part of the Freedman's Bureau) but left in 1866. Despite later publications in De Bow's Review (in 1867) and Lippincott's Magazine (in 1869 and 1870), George Fitzhugh's postbellum life, like the lives of other proslavery apologist writers, was characterized by relative obscurity. Shortly after his wife's death in 1877, Fitzhugh retired to Frankfort, Kentucky to live with his son. Two years later in 1880, he moved near his daughter's residence in Huntsville, Texas, where he died July 30, 1881.

     Leftists have constantly fought, although we tend to think of them as homogeneous. There were different flavours of Marxism some of which were intellectual fashions and died, like structuralist Marxism associated with Louis Althusser (1918-1990) who strangled his wife, a leftist sociologist. It happens.
  https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/4336-but-didn-t-he-kill-his-wife

     But, the big battle now is over gender, or transgenderism, which is deconstructing even conventional feminism, as women are now a social construction:
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/09/old-left-condemns-new-left-authoritarian-transgender-culture/

     I always suspected that the American Revolution, the Revolutionary War, was a New World Order set-up, in the early Illuminati/Adam Weishaupt mode, who is pretty much like the standard intellectual of today. Here is a mainstream site going on about him; I don’t have any classic conspiratorial books, but I am sure you on-line library will have them, and in fact, before the article is over, my monkey, who acts as my research assistance, will find the links.
  https://www.livescience.com/40048-what-is-the-illuminati.html

“The Illuminati was an 18th-century secret society made up of numerous influential intellectuals and freethinkers of the time. The organization, which is also known as the Bavarian Illuminati, opposed the Roman Catholic Church's control over philosophy and science; promoted the education of women and their treatment as equals; sought to "enlighten" people's minds and free them from superstitions and prejudices; and tried to reduce the oppression of the state. The Illuminati was the brainchild of Adam Weishaupt, who was the chair of canon law and later the dean of the faculty of law at the University of Ingolstadt in Bavaria (a state in southeast Germany) in the early 1770s, according to "New England and the Bavarian Illuminati" (Columbia University Press, 1918), a nonfiction book about the secret society. Weishaupt was vocally critical of the "intolerance and bigotry" of the church, which, at the time, held strong influence over the University of Ingolstadt, as well the politics and government of Bavaria. His criticisms resulted in clashes with the Jesuits, leading Weishaupt to conclude that a secret organization of liberal-minded individuals was necessary to outwit the "enemies of reason." He initially sought to join one of the Freemason lodges, but lacked the funds to do so and felt the order was too well-known to the general public. So, on May 1, 1776, Weishaupt formed the Order of the Illuminati with four other members.

To The Australian        Our public life is being spoiled by dogmatic agitators who bring their political fanaticism into issues of public memorials. Defacing or destroying memorials without adequate authority to do so is contemptible behaviour. Also on the wrong track is Lance Chadd when he calls for "equality" in the country's suite of public memorials ("Monumental time in indigenous history", 4-5/7). The criteria for acceptance and admiration should be quality of life lived (and contribution made to the nation or community) and quality of artistic representation of the person or persons concerned. Art and egalitarianism do not go well together. And the fact that some of our benefactors had bad sides to their character is not a justification for rejecting celebration of the real good they actually accomplished.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

     While most modern music is degenerate, country and western remains somewhat pure. Here are two versions of the classic “The Highwayman,” the first by the greats of country music singing together, and the second by Glenn Campbell’s daughter. And, what a tough dude this eternal Highwayman is, surviving hanging, being buried in concrete … that is the spirit of resistance “ I guess I will always be around.” Probably about the Faustian spirit of our race. And, I hope that it is true in these dark times. Darkness indeed.
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCQhdP4uTbA
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCQhdP4uTbA

     Good wholesome family values from good looking Nordic Christian kids of  the Petersens:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM_76pkynos
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry_Nh3slMgI

     This cannot end well; soon nobody is going to have a job, and we will be forced to eat the socialists!
  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8474819/Nearly-half-U-S-population-without-job.html

“Nearly half of the U.S. adult population is without a job, as the number of Americans filing for unemployment remains high and reopening in several states is slowed because of high levels of new coronavirus cases. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the employment-population ratio for May 2020 shows that just 52.8 percent of the adult population was employed last month. This means that 47.2 percent of adult Americans are jobless despite a surprising surge in jobs in May. The employment-population ratio highlights the number of employed people as a percentage of the U.S. adult population, creating a broader picture of the rate of employment across the country. While the unemployment rate only includes those actively looking for a job, this ratio accounts for those not in the labor force and those discouraged about their prospects of finding a job.”

     I have noticed that in politically correct culture, in primarily Nordic/Northern European ethnics, if couples have a number of children and they are in the limelight, then it is obligatory that they adopt Black or non-Nordic children. While this can be noble if the children are genuinely in need of care, I have often viewed this in a cynical light, as virtue signalling, which is using the kiddies as a political shield. And, that could be racist, gasp! Hell, what isn’t “racist”?
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/26/ibram-kendi-adopting-black-children-racist-white-colonizer/

“Ibram X. Kendi, director of Boston University’s Center for Antiracist Research, wrote on Saturday that white people who adopt black children may be “racist,” joining a growing group of Democrats and leftists commenting on Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Haitian son and daughter. Kendi wrote on social media: “Some White colonizers ‘adopted” Black children. They ‘civilized’ these ‘savage’ children in the ‘superior’ ways of White people, while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of denial, while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity.” “And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point,” he continued. “It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can’t be racist.” Kendi concluded, “I’m challenging the idea that White parents of kids of color are inherently ‘not racist’ and the bots completely change what I’m saying to ‘White parents of kids of color are inherently racist.’ These live and fake bots are good at their propaganda. Let’s not argue with them.”

     Ferfal and Matt Bracken in their live stream are far ahead of most of us, being in the heart of US decay. I imagine the White South Africans would be even more down the track, but they are too busy surviving to post videos. Anyway, this is worth listening to, even if you think that Australia will be fine, no matter if China invades, because well, I don’t know anymore. It seems that the messengers re always shot first, even metaphorically, in the Cassandra effect:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra_(metaphor)#:~:text=The%20Cassandra%20metaphor%20is%20applied,of%20their%20suffering%20with%20others 
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZHlNlXzGdo&t=3027s

     Here is one from the green leafy suburbs that the writers here are always raging about. White women who feel safe, go for Biden; those unsafe go for Trump. That does not increase my respect for the IQ of such women. Oh, a criticism of women, can we say that still?
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/21/poll-white-suburban-women-safe-biden-those-unsafe-trump/

“White suburban women who feel safe in their communities overwhelmingly support Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, but those who feel unsafe support President Donald Trump, according to an Axios/SurveyMonkey poll released on Thursday. The “survey of 14,043 U.S. adults who are white and live in suburbs,” was part of a “SurveyMonkey poll of 35,732 U.S. adults” that was conducted between August 31 and September 6 on the SurveyMonkey platform and has a margin of error of one percent. The popular SurveyMonkey platform — on which more than two million Americans participate in surveys of all sorts each day — uses a different polling methodology than most other polling firms, many of which begin with a file of confirmed registered voters whom they contact by landline phone, cell phone, or online, and ask questions about their likelihood of voting. Many polls use samples of registered voters only, while the subset of likely voters is considered by many polling professionals to be a more accurate predictor of actual voting behavior. In contrast, SurveyMonkey polls are open to all adults who reside in America. That sample includes registered voters, but also residents of the country — not necessarily American citizens — who are not registered to vote. With those caveats in mind, the SurveyMonkey poll results paint a clear and compelling picture. Fifty-eight percent of poll respondents who are white and live in suburbs say they feel “very safe” in their community, while 38 percent say they feel “somewhat safe” and four percent said they feel “unsafe.”

     Revelations about UFOs have been made by sources close to the US government, so it is safe to say that little green men from Mars walk among us, now, perhaps not all that visible out of fear of racial discrimination, and hate, but they are here. So, hasn’t the time come for Extra-terrestrial Lives Matter too? Or is it necessary for these green beings to make use of their super-advanced technology and laser beam and light sabre everything in sight, just to get a bit of justice? Just because these beings have green scaly skin/hide, and eyes, three of them, on stalks, does not mean that they are not subject to personhood rights, and comprehensive cosmic, universal, refugee resettlement packages. BLM need to think more cosmologically. Less wrecking, more thinking.