Vic Hughes, US scientist makes a methodological point that destroys utterly the climate change hysteric narrative and we need all the critical arguments available since this ideology, along with Covid, is being used to ring in the New World Order, and beyond, with an impoverished, cold, dark hunger world, with no fossil fuels for the ordinary people, and no meat. So, the science is relevant!
The point is that with climate models, small errors in initial data inputs, become magnified into large errors in forecasts. Error ranges thus ensure that it is a question of garbage in, garbage out. “The Climate Mafia know that this is true, but they still want money and power. They argue that even though you can't make a real temperature forecast, they can create a completely bogus forecasting approach, where they take a bunch of different climate models that don't agree (so much for settled science) and combine their outputs. They then say voilà: we have a correct prediction, and they use pseudo-statistics to get around the error problem. The way I visualize it is, if you take a bunch (an ensemble sounds more scientific) of wrong answers and then combine them, that is the right answer. Absurd.”