Queensland’s Premier Talks Sense on Mass Immigration, By James Reed
Queensland is one of the states which has been hit the hardest by the Albo government's genocidal mass immigration program. I refer to mass immigration as "genocide" in accordance with the UN definition, since the housing crisis it has produced, the worst in Australia's history, is directly impacting upon young people getting married and starting families, and Whites are particularly impacted here, but all races, including Aboriginals, are suffering the impacts.
With homelessness leading to tent cities forming all around Brisbane, the Queensland premier Steve Miles has spoken out, and good on him: "If migration continues at current levels we'll need tens of thousands more homes every year than industry can build", Premier Steven Miles said.
"That's a big part of why prices and rents have risen so rapidly."
"The Federal Government needs to assist us to ensure infrastructure keeps pace with population growth. We urge them to consider moderating migration levels to assist with population growth".
The Albo government is not doing this, being a puppet of the Big Australia lobby. As I keep saying, this attack upon the Australian people will continue until Australia has the sorts of street protests seen in Europe. They get away with this because Aussies are so passive compared to say, the Greeks and French. Start with legal mass protests outside of the universities, which are promoting mass immigration for their own profits. Peaceful, legal protests may make foreign students think about going to Asian universities which are getting to be superior to Australia's anyway.
Give One Nation a phone call, today!
"With Queensland experiencing its worst housing crisis in living memory and tent cities forming across Brisbane, Premier Steven Miles has taken direct aim at the Albanese government, urging it to cut the number of migrants it accepts so his state can better tackle the housing crisis.
Queensland's population grew by 2.7% in the year to September, with the state projected to welcome an additional 1.8 million people within a decade under planned immigration settings.
"If migration continues at current levels we'll need tens of thousands more homes every year than industry can build", Premier Steven Miles said.
"That's a big part of why prices and rents have risen so rapidly."
"The Federal Government needs to assist us to ensure infrastructure keeps pace with population growth. We urge them to consider moderating migration levels to assist with population growth".
"We need to have a sensible conversation about migration, and about the amount of funding the Commonwealth can and must deliver to meet the needs of a growing population", Queensland housing minister Meaghan Scanlon added.
"We need this because we want to make sure there is a home for everyone".
The Queensland government's comments follow those of Brisbane Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner, who last month called for the Albanese government "to regain control of our immigration system".
I have campaigned for lower immigration for a decade and have been called every name under the sun by pro-immigration shills: racist, xenophobic, a right wing nutjob, the looney fringe, you name it.
Now everyone seems to be falling into line.
Tuesday's federal budget promised to lower net overseas migration (NOM) to 260,000 in 2024-25. But even this level is 40,000 above the 220,000 NOM recorded in the 15 years of "Big Australia" pre-pandemic.
The NOM levels projected in the latest Intergenerational Report would see Australia's population swell to 40.5 million people by 2062-63, which is a 13.5 million population increase on the current level:
This level of population increase is the equivalent of adding another Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane worth of population in only 39 years.
Such a massive population increase would necessitate massive expenditure on new infrastructure and housing; otherwise, the economy, productivity, and living standards would become crush-loaded.
Really, NOM should be reduced to pre-2005 historical levels of around 120,000 a year. This would ensure that housing and infrastructure keep pace with the growing population. It would also safeguard the natural environment (including water supplies).
Comments