Forget about “hate crimes,” for now, in communist Britain, mere ‘dislike,” and “unfriendliness,” are crimes, according to the police:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/10/25/dislike-unfriendliness-hate-crimes-uk-police-confirm/

     Cutting to the chance, the police, in pursuing hate crimes, especially in social media, do not need to even prove hate (the burden of defence is on the people offending), and there is not even a legal definition of “hate”:

The following post was made today to Ted Byfield’s blog:  https://tedbyfield.wordpress.com/2017/10/10/the-real-dangers-of-its-sex-clubs-which-the-government-doesnt-discuss/comment-page-1/#comment-334

To which Wallace Klinck from Canada Responds:

to THE AGE
     Andrew Bragg is unrealistic in imagining that ‘no’ voters in the postal survey will suddenly cease discussion of the issue if they lose (‘Fair, focused debate needed as survey ends’, 26/10). Deeply held convictions will not be surrendered because of a political defeat that many will believe was achieved by ensuring that the public as a whole was inadequately briefed on the issues involved.
     He is right to urge a continuation of ‘respectful debate’ and consideration for the opinions of ‘no’ supporters. That is not compatible with his call for the legislation of same-sex marriage by Christmas. For the sake of ethical integrity and national unity, the government, if ‘yes’ wins, should proceed slowly and carefully and not act before all reasonable concerns about children’s welfare, free speech and parental rights have been addressed.
     NJ, Belgrave, Vic

to THE AGE
     The Government has faced realities in its response to the campaign for constitutional recognition (‘Coalition rejects Indigenous “voice” to Parliament’, 27/10). The Australian people will never sign away their national unity in a referendum powered by misguided idealism.
     Claims that people are not willing to listen to what ‘First Australians’ want are without foundation. No ‘First Australians’ are alive today!
     NJ, Belgrave, Vic

to THE AUSTRALIAN
     The core idea chosen for its annual conference by the Victorian Association for the Teaching of English is excellent (‘Teachers give identity politics a classroom push’, 27/10).  Secondary students indeed could benefit greatly from teaching that examines the role of ‘iconoclasts, dissidents, the marginalized and those who do not swim in the mainstream.’
     However, it appears that the actual choice of speakers and session themes is irresponsibly biased in favour of currently fashionable left-wing preoccupations. Nothing changes! I lost interest in VATE after struggling in vain with some other English teachers to save the Higher School Certificate and its examinations structure in 1983. Even then VATE appeared to have been ‘captured by the left’!
     NJ, Belgrave, Vic

to THE AGE
     Julia Banks simplifies and misrepresents the ‘no’ case that legalizing same-sex marriage involves injustice to children (‘I’m a Liberal and this is why I’m voting for “yes”’, 25/10). By contrast the matter is well put by Penny Mackieson (Letters): we should not be endorsing a change to the law which will  ‘facilitate the conception of children to be intentionally separated from their biological/genetic parent or parents’ and raised by others. This is only one aspect of the matter.
     Advocates of ‘no’, one feels, have been at a disadvantage in this postal survey, because their case is much less easily presented in alluring simplifications. That is one reason why the Government should not rush into legislation ‘before Christmas’ if the ‘yes’ case wins the ballot.
     NJ, Belgrave, Vic

     The Show is over and the next big event on the social calendar is the Melbourne Cup—‘the race that stops a nation’.  Enthusiasts study the ‘form guide’ and place their bets on the horse most likely to guarantee a return in relation to the odds offered by the bookmaker or betting agency; it can be great fun!

     Others enjoy the occasion by ‘investing’ what they can afford to lose in ‘Calcutta Sweeps which is also great fun and even better if you draw the winning horse!  Much depends on ‘Lady Luck’ or perhaps in these politically correct times, ‘Person Luck’!

to THE AUSTRALIAN
     Someone needs to explain to Noel Pearson and Pat Anderson why there has justifiably been ‘almost complete silence from government’ since the Uluru ‘Statement from the heart’ (‘Silence follows Uluru summit’, 25/10).  It has nothing to do with a ‘lack of responsibility’ or ‘failure of understanding’ among parliamentarians or COAG.  It comes from the sensible recognition in high places that the advisory body made demands which the majority of Australians will never be persuaded to endorse.
     Constitutional recognition of any kind has been shown to be inequitable, unjust to other citizens and a danger to our national unity, stability and security.  Waffle about Aboriginals being left ‘in the demountable out the back’ or that disadvantage cannot be tackled without ‘structural reform’ simply ignores reality.
     NJ, Belgrave, Vic

     It was ice, not global warming, that killed and entombed millions of mammoths and woolly rhinos in Siberia and Alaska.
     It was unrelenting cold and then ice, not global warming, that forced the Vikings out of Greenland.
     It was bitter winters, not heat waves, that finally defeated the armies of Napoleon and Hitler in Russia. George Washington’s army also suffered from an unusually bitter winter at Valley Forge in 1778, in the depths of the Little Ice Age.
     Snowy blizzards periodically kill more cattle than heatwaves in Colorado, South Dakota and Texas.

     When the Tambora volcano exploded in 1816 it spewed massive volumes of ash and “greenhouse” gases including carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. There was no global warming from the greenhouse gases, but the heat-blocking ash-filled atmosphere and a quiet sun caused “the year without a summer”. Failed crops and famine stalked Europe, Asia and America.

     Paedophilia is the next big thing of the evil elites. A vote will be taken in a few days to lower the age of consent to 13 years:
http://yournewswire.com/european-union-age-consent/

“Laurent Henry proposed the motion which “could free thousands of unjustly convicted prisoners” if the parliament decides to pass it.
“Our prisons are filled with young men that have been robbed of their youth, condemned to rot in jail for an act that should not be a crime. Why are we denying these young men the chance to play a more positive role in modern society?”, he said before the assembly Tuesday.
“Some even argue that a law on the age of consent has become superfluous and should no longer exist.”

     The news that the World Health Organization has rescinded its appointment of Robert Mugabe,  President of Zimbabwe, to a “goodwill ambassador” role, should raise more than a few questions:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/10/21/robert-mugabe-under-sanction-for-human-rights-abuses-is-named-a-who-goodwill-ambassador/?utm_term=.805bd08c29eb

     The WHO Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus, known as Tedros, said  that he had “listened carefully to all who have expressed their concerns” before ending the appointment.

     Victoria is Australia’s version of California, where every “progressive” idea seems to get its day in the sun, or is it, rain?

     Now we may have, depending upon the Legislative Council’s vote (subject to some last minute withdrawals: The Australia, October, 23, 2017, p. 1) euthanasia laws that will permit doctors to help the dying die, provided it is at the patient’s direct request, and the person has only 12 months or less to live. I would note, that these “months to live” predictions can be pretty unreliable, some people living for years after they were supposed to depart. But, we pass over that.

     Markus Willinger, Generation Identity: A Declaration of War Against the ‘68ers, (Arktos, London, 2013), is an identitarianism response to all the bad things happening in Europe, at least those things up until the publication date. It was published before the mass Muslim migration that has led to so much chaos, documented each day at numerous internet sites.

     The book aims to give a young European’s take on the dispossession of White Europeans. It has as its enemy, the “68ers,” which refers to the generation which became politically active around 1968, a time of massive social unrest across the West, especially Paris. It was a time that Marxists thought the revolution was coming, and that they would soon get power over life and death. This generation of Leftists hated everything about the West, and aimed, by a long march through the institutions, to destroy the West.

     In preparation for meeting my maker, I am making things easier for anyone dealing with the sorry events post-James Reed, and at least getting rid of most of my books. All are going to good homes, like lost puppies. But, one final series of articles, if they merit it.

     My first handful are a series of little books published, or distributed, on the race question by the League in days gone by. D. Watts, The Dangerous Myth of Racial Equality: Genocide for the White Races? (1982),  and A. T. Culwick and J.C. Oosthuizen, The Inequality Principle (not dated), are small books attacking the idea of racial equality, discussing the South African situation at the time, as one of the main lines of evidence. Things have got unimaginably worse since Blacks assumed rule, and the White genocide thesis has strong evidential support:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/world-economy/bury-them-alive-white-south-africans-fear-for-their-future-as-horrific-farm-attacks-escalate/news-story/3a63389a1b0066b6b0b77522c06d6476

     The main stream media was manic about a Russian conspiracy to change the course of the US election, by releasing “crooked” Hillary’s dirty secrets.  It did not matter to the MSM that there was dirt, only that something could be thrown at Trump.

     Now, they are awfully quiet about Hillary’s latest scandal, involving Russian attempts to acquire 20 percent of America’s uranium reserves:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355937-fbi-informant-blocked-from-telling-congress-about-russia-nuclear

     The African editor of France’s leading newspaper Le Monde, Hamidou Anne, said recently: “La France blanche, chrétienne…est finie. Terminée…”: “White, Christian  France is finished. Terminated. The future of the world is race-mixing.”
https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2017/10/18/white-christian-france-is-finished-terminated-the-future-of-the-world-is-race-mixing/

     Well, no it is not.  China is not having any part of this, and is rapidly developing the technological superiority to deal with any Camp of the Saints invasion. Those Californian professors, advocating the genocide of white people, as a moral imperative, may get more than they bargained for, because they simply have not thought things through beyond their childish hatred:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-19-muslim-professor-stays-genocide-against-whites-is-morally-required-and-yes-he-works-at-a-california-university.html
http://takimag.com/article/morally_required_genocide_davod_cole/print#axzz4wDFusV1a

     While the mainstream media heap burning hot coals upon Donald Trump for his alleged claim that British spiralling crime rates are due to Islamic terrorists, in Sweden it just depends on how one defines “terrorism”:

“Twenty members of the Moderate Party in Sweden have proposed the government deploys the armed forces in some of the country’s most dangerous no-go zones to combat “gang violence”.
Sweden is being overtaken by Islamic no-go zones. Moderate Party politician Mikael Cederbratt declared:
“It is absolutely necessary to do something, because these gangs are like cancerous tumours in our country, and it is urgent. My absolute belief is that we, the nation of Sweden, must declare war on criminal gangs”:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/10/swedish-politicians-call-for-army-to-be-deployed-to-no-go-zones

     In a number of emails to Australian activists Wallace Klinck wrote:

What nonsense and mischievous use of words to manipulate human minds and emotions!  Transgender?  No such thing—a pure fabrication.  Homophobic?  Another linguistic construct.  Any one who is not “phobic” in front of a lava flow, or during an earthquake, or a deadly plague, or a violent riot, or while facing the barrel of a gun is not likely to be long for this world.  If it can be shown that homosexuality has adverse consequences then any minimally intelligent individual would surely be “phobic” of it to the extent warranted—which is anything but inconsequential.

to THE AUSTRALIAN
     Janet Albrechtsen is right to defend Western culture and civilization and a knowledge of its history free from distortion by political ideology (‘We risk going down as age that forgot history’, 21-22/10). However, her own grasp of what needs defending (‘our modern liberal project’) is imperfect. Her claim that ‘we are all equal, regardless of skin colour, creed, sex or sexuality’ is unrealistic. The differences between individuals, and between peoples, need to be admitted and respected. Within the realms of politics and the law it is equity and not equality that should be espoused.

     Secondly, while she rightly laments the lack of university teaching of the history of the mediaeval and renaissance periods, as well as of British constitutional history, she is silent about the deficiency of fundamental Christian theology which has contributed greatly to the current impasse. Christianity undergirded the spectacular growth of the Western world, but cannot now contribute to renewal if it does not experience a new birth.

     Libertarianism is a popular philosophy among free market loving folk in America, especially, but what does the doctrine really mean? Here we have a leading libertarian, Professor Hans-Hermann Hoppe,  sum it all up:

“The theoretical, irrefutable core of the libertarian doctrine is simple and straightforward and I have explained it already repeatedly at this place. If there were no scarcity in the world, human conflicts, or more precisely physical clashes, would be impossible. Interpersonal conflicts are always conflicts concerning scarce things. 
I want to do A with a given thing and you want to do B with the same thing. Because of such conflicts—and because we are able to communicate and argue with each other—we seek out norms of behavior with the purpose of avoiding these conflicts. The purpose of norms is conflict-avoidance. If we did not want to avoid conflicts, the search for norms of conduct would be senseless. We would simply fight and struggle. 
Absent a perfect harmony of all interests, conflicts regarding scarce resources can only be avoided if all scarce resources are assigned as private, exclusive property to some specified individual or group of individuals. Only then can I act independently, with my own things, from you, with your own things, without you and me clashing.”
http://www.vdare.com/articles/hans-hoppe-libertarianism-the-alt-right-and-antifa-a-libertarian-strategy-for-social-change