Dr Mercola has observed that the present exposure of the scientific censorship over the origins of Covid-19, puts the practice of science in a highly negative light, as well it should. In fact, we have seen this with the suppression and oppression of dissent thought on climate change, especially those who see a global COOLING occurring due to a solar minimum. Peer review has become little more than dogs with fleas sniffing each other and scratching each other’s fleas, as these parasites jump from one host to another. Peer review does not get to the truth since the ideas remain in the same circle of bias, and since the initial pool of examiners are most probably corrupt, garbage in, garbage out! That is why there is now a practice of internet publication, where the material can be seen and evaluated by everyone, the only community that counts. But the academics want peer review since it keeps profits in the publishing houses of the big journals, and keeps young academics in line, with the frantically insane publish or perish ideology. It is, in sociological terms, just in-group reinforcement.