Here I will tackle a topic that conservatives fear to talk about: race mixing, developing an argument best expressed by the late former heavy-weight boxing champion of the world, Muhammad Ali.

     Those who write about this from the right tend to be somewhat extreme, if not hateful, but I will show that there is a “multicultural” approach to the question, which does not depend upon hate at all. For a scholarly introduction to the political correctness of race mixing see Peter Frost, Fair Women, Dark Men: The Forgotten Roots of Color Prejudice, (Cybereditions, 2005), where the title says it all. For a more sober overview: W. B. Provine, “Geneticists and the Biology of Race Crossing,” Science, vol. 182, 1973, pp. 790-796.

     While the gender agenda pushes on the idea that there is no real biological basis to gender, and individuals who have gender confusion and childhood gender dysphoria should have access to corrective surgery – even though it is all a social construction: https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2017/05/childhood-gender-dysphoria-responsibility-courts/, hard science continues to find a large number of biologically based sex differences.

     For your interest, M. Gershoni and S. Pietrokovski, “The Landscape of Sex-Differential Transcriptome and its Consequent Selection in Human Adults,” BMC Biology, (2017), outlined 1,559 genetic difference between males and females that are not only related to sex organ differences, but to other organs such as the brain, skin and muscle.
Science is still discovering what it biologically means to be male or female, so even on this basis, let alone with reference to psychological data, there should be a profound questioning of the gender agenda, which takes gender/sex, as a purely arbitrary social construction. Rather, it is the gender agenda, which is a Leftist social construction, a product of bad social science and bad politics: http://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2012/07-08/the-war-against-human-nature-ii-gender-studies-part-1/.

     Be patient little Hobbits, the collapse of this dark system will take place in due course. It will not fall away until it is ready, and the white ants of destiny have eaten their fill.
For example, Venezuela’s already currency collapse is getting worse, with the bolivar in free fall. There are shortages of basics, and violence is on the rise: http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/28/news/economy/venezuela-currency-collapse/index.html, with complete economic collapse only a few non-shopping days away: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/29/venezuela-is-on-the-brink-of-a-complete-collapse/?utm_term=.9559bcdfaa35.

     The economic contagion is likely to spread throughout the region: http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/06/29/john-bolton-instability-venezuela-spread-throughout-region/. Who knows where it will lead, a kind of zombie apocalypse of financial contamination, that only a global world could produce.

     I was not surprised to find Mr Big Australia immigrationist Bernard Salt (The Weekend Australian, July 1-2, 2017, p. 17) expressing no concern about the decline of Christianity in Australia. It is a little difficult to pin down his exact position, but the article to me seems to see the rise of atheism as an expression of a positive view of humanity, and that the movement towards secular humanism is a strength, just like diversity, immigration, blah, blah, blah. Like so many of the faith of multiculturalism, he embraces relativist and humanist ideals. As noted by Jennifer Oriel, anti-Christianity is “invariably couched in the language of diversity, inclusion and minority right.” The Australian, July, 3, 2017, p. 12.

     Christianity supplied the moral foundation for the free world, and the decline of Christianity will not lead to atheism replacing it. Mass immigration will bring forth, as it has in Europe the new religion of the New World order, Islam, to fill the vacuum. Atheist materialism is unstable: atheists are generally white, affluent and don’t reproduce. Hence, they will be demographically replaced by the energies of Islam. The soul of the West would be dead.

     As written about previously at this site by yours truly: https://blog.alor.org/index.php/mass-immigration-benign-anglo-saxon-genocideby-peter-west, the elites have been over-joyed about the Census results showing a further decline in traditional Anglo- Australia, and Christianity.

     In my article I argued that the common-sense view from the street, not reflected in so-called official statistics, is that Australia is already heading to White minority status, and that Anglo-Saxons are definitely a minority now. Asian immigration has already begun to replace even the traditional elites and professionals: https://www.bookdepository.com/Howard-Legacy-Peter-Wilkinson/9780980400809. The White new class welcome this trend and intend to do everything in their power to push it through to completion.

     Mike Adam’s sites are featuring an article which quotes astrophysicist Dr Alan Fitzsimons at the Queen University Belfast Astrophysics Research Centre, who says that there is a disturbing probability that an asteroid strike could wipe out the human race.  There are millions of large Near Earth  asteroids, many as big as 10-story buildings out in orbit, capable of impacting with the Earth: http://collapse.news/2017-06-28-astrophysicist-warns-humanity-will-eventually-be-wiped-out-by-an-asteroid-strike-just-a-matter-of-time.html.

     In January 2017, asteroid 2017 BX passed by the Earth without any threat of collision.  But, in  November 2016, there was a narrow miss between the Earth and the asteroid 2016 VA, missing the Earth by only 77,00 kilometres, which is not much in cosmological terms, a bee’s whisker. In 2013, another small asteroid exploded over the city of Chelyabinsk in Russia, causing extensive damage. An air-burst asteroid exploded over Tunguska in Russia in Siberia in 1908, exploding with the energy equivalent of 185 Hiroshima bombs. So, it happens.

to THE AGE
     Many voices in the letters column (4/7) are worried about the growth of world population, Melbourne’s burgeoning size and our increasingly deficient infrastructure. Public opposition to further immigration is growing. What to do?
     Is it possible that one cause of the growing problem is the kind of financial system operating in the world, which appears to be controlled by the super-wealthy?  It seems that many Australian businesses are forced to support increased immigration in order to survive financially, even though their owners know that long term this is against the interest of the whole population. Should we look again at Douglas social credit and other proposals for reform of the money system?
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

to THE AUSTRALIAN
     Matt Ridley entertains and informs perceptively with his take on how insult terminology is carefully coined and then deployed to wrong foot ideological opponents (‘Left leads the right in manufacturing words of mass distraction’, 4/7).  However, his claim that ‘denier’ is ‘a revolting word’ seems over the top. There are those who deny that man-made global warming is occurring and endangering mankind; there are also a few erratics who deny that the Holocaust happened. It’s OK to call them deniers.
     It is a pity, though, that Ridley did not seize the opportunity to point out that most of those who are damned as ‘Holocaust deniers’ are really only Holocaust revisionists. Such historians readily agree that the Nazi regime was anti-Jewish from start to finish and that many injustices and crimes against Jews were perpetrated under its authority; they simply claim that the facts have been significantly exaggerated. What is revolting in this case is not the term itself but its misuse involving a new context of persecution.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

     There are large number of sites discussing the disturbing trend of open expression of race hate against Whites:
https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_white_genocide_evidence_project_usa
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/07/01/british-student-union-boss-welcomes-islamic-takeover-wants-oppress-white-people-revenge/
http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2017/06/20/yale-dean-who-called-people-white-trash-on-yelp-leaving-her-post.html
https://medusamagazine.com/beyond-pro-choice-the-solution-to-white-supremacy-is-white-abortion.

     Here is a sample from this little monster above:

to THE AUSTRALIAN
    The supernatural is much more than ‘mythology’ and ‘legends’ as Patrick Ball imagines (5/7) and it is hard to see how any person can be designated Christian who disbelieves in it, when Jesus is quoted as having said that his kingdom ‘is not of this world.’
     The supernatural aspect of religion, which is something not limited only to Christianity, is essential as the basis of hope and salvation or ‘life beyond the veil’. The higher worlds really do exist, which is why the universe of the materialists and atheists, who close the door on them, appears so thin and meagre, no matter how many galaxies are counted.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

     We would not be doing our duty to readers if all we did were to supply hope about the coming age of prosperity.  I hope that this can be rung in by the creation of an alternative social credit economy, I really do. However, I am pretty much a short-term thinker, from the military perspective, a grunt, and I am concerned about day-to-day survival, rather than great flights of philosophy.  I just don’t have the patience for it, and struggle even to get through articles by my friends and colleagues at this site. It is my fault, but I am too old a dog to learn new tricks now.

     From my tent outpost here in the Victorian scrub, through the bitter cold nights, while I drink billy-boiled tea by my camp fire, I see the coming of hard times. For many hard times are here already, with many sites telling the story of people just not being able to get by:
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/69-percent-of-americans-do-not-have-an-adequate-emergency-fund
http://collapse.news/2017-06-28-face-it-americans-are-broke-and-most-dont-have-a-dime-saved-up.html.

to THE AUSTRALIAN
     In bemoaning ‘the generational decline in the Christian faith as guide to the common good’ (‘Blessed be the egoistic individuals’, 8-9/7) Paul Kelly becomes too gloomy when he finishes by asserting that ‘once dismantled’, the old order of devotion to family, faith and public welfare ‘cannot be put back together.’ He has forgotten the permanent truth of the symbol of the phoenix rising from the ashes.

     And no, it’s not true that ‘modesty, humility and Christian forbearance make no sense in today’s world’, though maybe we could do with some strengthening of them. It will come: God never leaves humanity without prophets, sages and saints, to recall wandering sheep and chastise goats.
NJ, Belgrave, Vic

      A court in Hanover has handed suspended sentences to six members of a Kurdish clan who seriously wounded two dozen police officers during a violent rampage in Hameln. The court's ruling was greeted with anger and derision by police who said it is yet another example of the laxity of Germany's politically correct judicial system.

      The case goes back to January 2014, when a 26-year-old clan member, arrested for robbery, tried to escape from the magistrate's office by jumping out of a seventh-floor courtroom window. The suspect was taken to the hospital, where he died. Members of his clan subsequently ransacked the hospital, as well as the court, and attacked police with rocks and other projectiles; 24 police officers and six paramedics were injured.

     If we want to understand Australia’s success as a modern nation, as one of the world’s oldest continuous democracies, we must look back to the origins of our institutions. Civil society, liberal democracy, constitutional government, the rule of law and individual rights are all essential features of our free society.
     Institutions provide an important foundation for a society to attain its full potential. They are a legacy to this generation, passed down by those who have sought freedom of conscience, religion, speech, and the right to participate in politics and public debate.
     As part of the Foundations of Western Civilisation Program, the Institute of Public Affairs has produced a series of short films which explain the important role that British Institutions have played in shaping our nation.

The Magna Carta

     Champions of diversity and ethno-cultural pluralism are quick to point out that “diversity is our strength.” But, have you ever seen any scientific argument for this claim, that is, proof? Are arguments and counter-arguments carefully evaluated? Of course not; the claim is propaganda, and is enforced at the end of the bayonet of the Law, to keep us under control, until it is demographically too late. Some special, lucky people can seemingly say what they like: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4629820/Outrage-professor-s-rebuke-self-identified-whites.html, but if the same, or even much less, was done by Whites, the moral outrage would never end. Whole cities would be rocked by unending protests, and the world would quiver on its axis in moral panic.

     With the cucking and deracination of the White population there was probably no need by the elites to use the hardball tactics; we could have been left to slowly die out, but no, the elites are impatient and want their New World Order, yesterday.

     This title comes from a book written by a concerned Aussie about the race issue, which I unfortunately cannot now locate, and there does not appear to be an internet trace of it. But, the argument is, I recall: why bother about preserving natural diversity of species and races/sub-species, if this is not applied to humans as well? Does it really matter if the genetic integrity and purity of say, American bison, is preserved: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/06/11/animal-conservation-or-bison-supremacism/? If human races are a social construct, then so too would be breeds of animals, and with some plausibility, since many breeds were constructed by human-controlled breeding programs.

     Hence, if biology is to be discounted, doused and denounced: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/06/06/doused-and-denounced/, there is no reason for concern about the “environment,” which is also a social construct. So must be global warming too. Even if it existed, as a social construct, we could just define it away. Easy.
Sociological relativism is such fun; far more interesting than reality, and almost as magical as Harry Potter.

     Former PM John Howard – remember him? – wrote in The Weekend Australian, June 24-25, 2017, p. 20 about “Threats Anew to Freedom of Religion, Speech.”  Oh, the irony of someone, claiming to be a conservative, who did nothing to roll back section 18C, and who advanced the agenda of mass Asian immigration, to such an extent that he lost his own seat: Peter Wilkinson, The Howard Legacy: Displacement of Traditional Australia from the Professional and Managerial Classes, (2007).

But, that is water under the bridge now, as the once good ship Oz, slowly sinks, from taking on too much water. The pumps have long ago failed.

     Alt Right and White nationalist intellectuals such as Peter Brimelow, have said that the present cultural war will lead to blood, and in fact, it already has: https://www.vdare.com/articles/it-will-come-to-blood-reflections-on-the-lefts-anti-trump-inauguration-tantrum?redirect=http://www.vdare.com/articles/it-will-come-to-blood-reflections-on-the-lefts-anti-trump-inauguration-tantrum.

     Greg Sheridan, “Patriotism and Resentment Could have Us Seeing Red,” The Australian, June 22, 2017, p. 12, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/greg-sheridan/patriotism-and-resentment-could-have-us-seeing-red/news-story/fe3f35e28ac4440436690ad3f708e183,  says that the “will be blood thesis” is a bit early, but the bulk of his article shows that it is already happening. Here are some extracts from an insightful article.
Note that the point of this is to show that some of the things said at this site are, after some delay, also now being said in the mainstream media, not because we are influencing them, or that they care a jot what we say, but because external circumstances make such matters impossible not to notice. I think the League writers have been the first in Australia to predict the “there will be blood” theme, while the mainstream media, and some freedom types were still thinking about economics and growth, and strategies and theories time-locked in an age that has now passed.

     N. A. Christakis and J. H. Fowler, “Friendship and Natural Selection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, July 22, 2014, present evidence that friends tend to exhibit “homophily” (“love of the same”) in their genotypes. Cutting to the chase, people in general tend to have racial kin as part of their friendship networks. Sure, there is variation to this, as there must be with any statistical generalisation, but, birds of a feather, really do flock together.

     US surveys show that Americans certainly choose racial kin as friends:
https://www.prri.org/research/poll-race-religion-politics-americans-social-networks/. As stated in an article covering this, “the average black person’s friend network is eight percent white, but the average white person’s network is only one percent black. To put it another way: Blacks have ten times as many black friends as white friends. But white Americans have an astonishing 91 times as many white friends as black friends.
There are a number of factors driving these numbers. Simple population counts are one of them: There are more white people than black people in the United States, so it makes sense that the average American is going to have more white friends than black friends.

     We have had many Hollywood types mouthing increasingly radical politically correct crazy talk since the 2016 US election.  Now, trying to outdo the likes of Madonna, actor Mark Ruffalo, not buffalo, has said that MSNBC, an American cable/satellite TV company, should not hire any more White conservative people: http://www.whatfinger.com/single-post/2017/06/23/Dice-No-More-White-People-on-MSNBC-Actor-Mark-Ruffalos-Insane-Demands. Strike one, if they are White, and strike two, well, they are conservative too.

     The response to these sort of “ban whitey” proclamations should be for Americans to vote with their wallets, and exercise their consumer rights not support anyone pushing this line. Nevertheless, before that, actors such as Ruffalo need to resign and allow people of colour, and disadvantaged actors, to take their choice screen roles.
Hulk, smash, indeed.