There has been a disturbing trend of major medical journals initially accepting a paper discussing Covid vaccination injuries for publication, or publishing it, then while the paper clocked up thousands of views, suddenly withdrawing it, for no clear reason. The latest example of this is a paper that was removed from The Lancet’s preprint SSRN server within 24 hours. The paper written by a distinguished medical team, including Dr Peter McCullough, reviewed 325 autopsies of Covid vaxxed subjects. It was found that the Covid vaxxes contributed to 74 percent of the deaths. The most affected organ system in Covid vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system at 53 percent, followed by the haematological system at 17 percent, the respiratory system at 8 percent, and multiple organ systems at 7 percent. This is surely a very important paper that at least deserved peer review. But instead the paper was removed with this explanation: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.” Dr McCullough replied that it was never explained why this was so.
