In my previous article dealing with my personal frustration with doctors, I mentioned the argument that is given in dismissing adverse vaccine effects, namely that they are “rare.” But, what is “rare”? Surely whatever probability level is used, it must be consistent with past experience and dealings with vaccines. And, by any standards, there are substantially more deaths and adverse effects from the Covid vaxxes than other vaccines, even ones such as Swine Flu that were withdrawn.
At present 10,000 Australians have registered for a government program for compensation for Covid vax injury. The medical profession says that if that number is divided by all those jabbed, one gets a small number, so, nothing to see here. Well, it is early days yet, and who knows what will happen in the longer term, and by definition, the longer-term has not yet occurred. This blog has covered peer reviewed, or to be reviewed preprint articles and opinion by minority researchers, who suggest that the long term consequences could be dire. Such concerns are also dismissed. But, the mainstream medical profession has been wrong before, many times, such as with the sedative thalidomide, which caused horrendous birth defects, with babies being born without limbs. And long ago, doctors supported people smoking, also seen as a relaxant, even though there was concerns raised about cancer by the medical heretics of the time. Shouldn’t the medical profession follow Sir Karl Popper and exercise a wee bit more scepticism and critical rationality, especially since by any probability standard, doctor-caused illness remains a high killer and producer of adverse effects? They are not infallible.