I came across this opinion piece, which while not being exactly new in its sentiments, is a very good summary of what has happened over the Covid years, and the likely shape of things to come without the public waking up to the fact that like the proverbial frogs in water over a heater, they are being slowly cooked. As noted, the authorities treated Covid as a new Black Death, even though its mortality rate was around 99 percent survivable for most people not aged over 80 years of age, or immune suppressed. On that flawed basis, under influence of the communist Chinese (who gave the West Covid in the first place from their Wuhan bioweapons lab) via the World Health Organization, the most draconian attack upon civil liberties ever seen in Australia’s history began.

Cairnsnew.com reproduces some thoughtful comments by Senator Price, who did such great work opposing the Voice referendum, with her comments that the prime minister has not learnt anything from the failure of the Voice referendum. True indeed. But as I see it, it is not a matter of the prime minister attempting to act to serve the Australian people. That is not what the modern system is about, with a few exceptions such as Senator Price. It is all about serving the real masters, the globalists of organisations such as the United Nations.

The radical climate protest groups seem to be well funded, unlike our side of politics which struggles to get by. So where does the money come from? George Soros? Maybe. But an investigation by the Telegraph, who is good on these things, has uncovered a whole gang of British billionaires who have been bankrolling the zero net mania to the tune of multi-million-dollar donations.

British financier Sir Christopher Hohn has donated more than £670 million to climate issues from his philanthropic fund in less than a decade. He along with Michael Bloomberg, a former New York mayor, have funded the C40 cities network, which are cities who have mayors who agree with radical climate policies, such as seen with London mayor Sadiq Khan, who has called for people to eat less meat, give up their private cars, all in aid of dealing with a supposed climate crisis.

Not only are South African farmers subjected to farm invasions, but now, as part of the government plan to drive them off the land to be replaced by Blacks, white farmers are banned from exports unless having a Black partner. It is but one more example of the South African government’s racist policies which are far worse than anything seen back in the apartheid era. And, it will further cripple South African agriculture, which already has had racial impositions made upon it, such as regulations that came into force in in May this year giving racial quotas for the use of water. Enterprises which use or store water will not be granted water licences unless they have a Black shareholding of between 25 and 75 percent. It goes on and on.

As I have said, if white farmers could gain access to say Russia or South America to start all-over again, even walking away with nothing, it would be better than slowly being wiped out here. South Africa is a lesson in anti-white racism and the mania of diversity that should be a telling lesson to the West of what is in store down the track when whites in Western countries become minorities.

Along with governments being in hock to Big Pharma, Big Tech is probably even more controlling. Thus, when 5G tech was rolled out, the governments proclaimed that there were no health issues here, nothing to see. Wherever the global corporate elites have profits to be made, expect “our” governments to be compliant to their every whim.

It was inevitable that the two recent obsessions of the ruling elites, Covid and climate change would join up. These scams are both of importance for advancing a one world government, at least controlling the West in a New World Order. But there are other aspects to this as well, as the Covid plandemic ideology and climate change can be used to cover for each other. Thus, suppose that the mRNA vaxxes are flawed and really have led to the excess deaths seen since the vax rollout. How does the system explain this, when they themselves admit that the deaths are not from Covid, for to do so would be to admit that the vaccination program was a failure?

The vibe of the time, at least since the Covid plandemic, has been the dismantling of liberal democratic traditions, in favour of the model of governance offered by communist China, as progress to a one world, New World Order. This reworking of the Western philosophical ethos will not happen overnight, but it is being done at a rapid pace none the less.

Thus, today at the blog James Reed covers the totalitarian ramifications of the Albo Labor government’s Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, which will effectively eliminate free speech on the internet. The government here is making no effort to hide its intentions, as it considers activities such as questioning the safety to the Covid vaxxes to be beyond the pale, and even opposes an investigation into Australia’s excess death rate. As well, it would certainly consider proposals that the Covid virus was not a natural evolutionary product, but came from a bioweapons lab, alarming disinformation too. In fact, this is a government which did not, and has not challenged communist China about its illegal sonic attack upon Australian navy divers, so expect the worst.

Nick Cater, senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre, has given a sound critique of the Albo Labor government’s Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. This Bill has been shelved for reworking to deal with religious issues, but we are not told exactly what. The evil Greens want this already totalitarian piece of legislation made even more evil. Thus, The Australian Communications and Media Authority will act as judge, jury and executor of what counts as legitimate speech, and will enforce this by massive fines to social media companies to do the suppression themselves. We can be sure that to keep on the safe side, the companies will go into panic overdrive and censor more aggressively than the government would if it was itself doing the foul deed. It is sinister, indeed.

Jo Nova makes the telling point that communist China merely gives lip service to the climate change agenda, championed by the West, and in any case, the UN and other organisations define China as “developing,” and hence free from the impositions the globalists are imposing upon Western countries. In fact, China is, unlike the West, accelerating its building of coal-fired power stations, clearly indicating that emperor Xi had no intention of keeping his pledge to phaseout coal. China is building six times more cola fired power plants than the rest of the world, around two such plants per week, which is an extraordinary achievement:

The Albo government waited until after the conclusion of APEC to let the public know that divers with the Royal Australian Navy suffered injuries after being attacked by sonic pulses from a communist Chinese warship. This attack occurred of the coast of Japan on November 14, before the PM Albo left to attend APEC. This was done in international waters. If the sides were reversed and Australia did this to the Chinese, I expect that it would be seen as an act of war. Wars have started for less.

As Malcolm Roberts rightly points out, it is about time our political leaders started protecting Australian interests, rather than bowing to communist China, in cringing, embarrassing acts of appeasement, which emperor Xi would simply laugh at.

John Derbyshire, now an American, but born in Britain, reports quite accurately on the state of my depressing homeland, Britain. There is nothing particularly new which I have not covered in my blogs; the open border situation, the social welfare system laid out for illegals, the tide of woke. Things like the police championing anti-white racism, are not discussed, but one can only write so much about this misery before one’s brain fogs over. So, here is his summary on the end of Britain. It is not as if we have not been warned, warned since the “rivers of blood” speech by Enoch Powell, April 20, 1968: “As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'.”

https://vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-lessons-from-britain-s-national-extinction-its-deep-state-is-as-bad-as-ours?scroll_to_paragraph=14

Socialists almost destroyed what was once the richest country in South America, Argentina, and they have still been at work, with the government of now former President Alberto Fernández, producing “unprecedented economic crisis, fuelling skyrocketing inflation, joblessness, and social anxiety,” in short, social chaos. In this environment the colourful Javier Milei, a libertarian freedom candidate arrived on the scene, and as the clear underdog, look on the giants and cut them down to size. That is an intentional metaphor as Milei often did campaign promotions where he waved around a moving chain saw, somewhat dangerously, cutting things up. It made an impression.

Hopefully, his election will be part of a new wave across the planet of freedom candidates. We expect Milei to pull out of the World Health Organization for starters. If he is sincere he will begin the pushback against the UN and World Health Organization agendas on health and digital identity. It will be a good start, hopefully joined by a return of Donald Trump in 2024, who may this time do something against the globalists. 

While freedom movement types cite freely 1984 by George Orwell, which probably few of them have read, a lesser know dystopian fiction is Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World written in 1932. Huxley speculated about future tyrannies, and he saw the threat of technocracy being primarily. People may not be controlled by the iron fist as in 1984, but by the syringe, drugs and brainwashing.

The push is on to establish a National Firearms Register, following the tragic murder of two police officers. For the legacy media it seems that if such a register existed, where police in any Australian state could access via the tap of a few computer keys, all the firearms details about any firearms owner in any state, terrible crimes like this would be prevented. That point is delusional, as while such a register, to cost a cool $ 200 million plus, would give information, that X owns a firearm, so what? How exactly would that help, since surely police tactics would assume that any suspect was armed anyway?

I note in particular the spin given in the article: “three religious extremists, none of whom were ­legally allowed to possess the ­arsenal of high-powered weapons and stockpile of ammunition they had hoarded on the remote property, more than 300km west of Brisbane. Shooter Nathaniel Train’s Queensland gun licence had been suspended four months earlier, and his brother, Gareth Train, and Gareth’s wife, Stacey Train, were not licensed to own or shoot firearms at all.” So, the criminals were not in lawful possession of firearms. Well, shouldn’t police had removed the guns from them sooner, taking all precautions of course, that is going fully armed to the premises, with plenty of backup officers? Nothing wrong with that, it is just sound situational awareness.

TikTok, the communist Chinese social media spy site, tried an experiment where they wanted to see if social media influencers could get impressionable Western youth to come out in support for terrorist Osama bin Laden. It worked like a charm, with piles of youth giving the thumbs up to bin Laden’s 2002 “Letter to America,” supposedly written by him.

The case for banning TikTok is not a free speech issue. TikTok has no interest in promoting free speech in the West on any topic of concern, and censors anything critical of the CCP and Emperor Xi. It promotes the degenerate dumbing down of culture, while China’s own TikTok, Douyin, has none of this, which gives the game away. Furthermore, the social media site is a spying device, and it is well known that people in defence and national security must not open this site on their computers. It is thus a danger, and should be banned.

The mainstream Sydney Morning Herald has reported on the coming death of the Australian middle class, something we knew was happening. The cost of living crisis is eroding middle class incomes and dreams as well, with the housing crisis, fuelled by mass immigration, making the ideal of a quarter acre block home, a memory.  The quarter acre block home was once a symbol of the Australian dream, something hard work could deliver; but that is no more.

As the article says: “If wage growth kept up with the growth our property sector has seen over the last 40 years, the average Australian would be on an income of $162,000. The dream of home ownership, a quintessential aspect of middle-class life, has become an increasingly elusive goal.”

There have been claims on the internet at various substack, that first the mask introduction in South Australian hospitals, and yesterday, masks reintroduced in Western Australian hospitals, could mark the beginning of the return of wider Covid mandates. I personally think this is drawing a long bow at the moment, but anything is possible, and we need to keep hyper-vigilant and watch how things are played out. My guess is that the health technocrats are eagerly waiting for a much more severe virus (Bill Gates has told us that this virus is coming, due to natural evolution, of course), which will no doubt have to be released from some bioweapons lab, just in time to allow election fraud to defeat Donald Trump once more. Unless, of course, the corrupt legal system with its kangaroo courts succeeds in nailing him, which is highly likely.

https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/tyranny-alert-for-west-australians

While the prime minister has been crowing about a supposed 55,000 jobs created, the Australian Bureau of Statistics labour force release figures have indicated that unemployment has risen by 3.7 percent. The youth unemployment rate rose in October, to 9.2 percent, the highest it has been since late 2021. Economists are predicting a further slow down in the economy, so expect the unemployment figures to get even worse. Wages were given a kick in the guts during the Covid plandemic and it is anyone’s guess how long they will take to recover. Macrobusiness.com.au, my now go-to site for seeing the economic plight of Australia, sums it up: “It is going to be a long and painful road ahead for Australian workers.”

There seems to be a growing public opposition to the Labor government’s zero net program, a program that will have radical impacts upon the Australian standard of living. The ordinary people like us are facing a cost-of-living crisis, with rising energy costs and inflation affecting everything, and worrying about long-term hypothetical events like climate change is a luxury few people who are not members of the elite classes can afford. But, while there may be this public discontent, it has not yet fused into a coherent political movement, just as there is public angst about housing and mass immigration, but so far, no organised street opposition.

This is relevant since it is by no means the end of the use of pandemics by the elites to aid of achieving their New World Order, and overall, opposition to all aspects of the Covid plandemic was not adequate to prevent the terrible damage that was done to people’s lives and small business. The Oxford University study has shown that the Covid lockdowns were not more effective at controlling the Covid outbreak than approaches such as in Sweden, which did not involve any lockdowns at all. The modelling showed that allowing individuals to modify their own behaviour, using measures such as minimising contacts and social distancing, were just as effective as lockdowns and face masks. However, the Oxford team did not reject the top-down authoritarian approach, which they did see as reducing deaths, only that it was via trade-offs, equal to the decentralised individualistic approach. To my mind, as the authoritarian approach involved steam-rolling individual liberty, it must therefore be rejected as a public health failure.