Rebekah Barnett gives her take on the Voice referendum, taking the No side. She responds to the week of silence that the indigenous radicals have called for, and which the prime minister is apparently granting too, which I think could be in some ways a good thing, not to hear them all for a week. Could they extend it to a month, or how about, forever? Not discriminatory; all of them, of all colours, need to give it a rest, especially the prime minister. Enough of this ear-bashing and black arm band woes.

Anyway, the statement by the indigenous elites is "Recognition in the constitution of the descendants of the original and continuing owners of Australia would have been a great advance for Australians. Alas, the majority have rejected it." But as she points out, this was not what the referendum was about. It was to write into the constitution a whole new chapter that would create the Voice body, and all the laws necessary for its operation. There was constitutional law debate about just how far this power would go, whether there would be any limits to it at all. Barnett goes into detail for those interested in the division that existed even within the indigenous communities over this referendum. And even if they all supported it, it would have still been right to reject it for all the reasons given by the No side in the debate, and summarised at the Alor.org blog throughout the long and winding road of the so-called debate. They would simply have been wrong!

With all the over-the-top woke things going on in the UK, it is perhaps no surprise to learn that George Orwell, author of 1984, is being cancelled as well. The leading early critic of the technocracy, falling to the technocracy! That is not irony, but to be expected, as the elites want to eliminate anything that might allow the masses the imagination for resistance. The attack upon Orwell, for the moment is upon his person, that he was a "sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic and sometimes violent" person, but expect more to come.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ministry-bullst-tries-cancel-orwell-telegraph-follows-orwellian-formula

This is how far the UK has gone down the woke highway to hell. The British Labour party is planning to make Misgendering someone a crime, when it takes office. It will because politics is always, hit them with the Left, then sucker punch them with the Right. This will be done once more by adding to the already draconian hate laws. Misgendering will be on the same level as assault or harassment motivated by race or religion, which is two years in prison.

Even George Orwell, who is also being cancelled, did not dream of this, nor any of he pre-World War II social critics. It is beyond the theatre of the absurd.

Doctor Walid Farhat, chief of paediatric urology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Medicine and Public Health, has stated that research about the impacts of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers is “severely lacking.” The claims were made in a grant application. He argued that ““lack of information” is being used to deny hormone therapy to minors. Farhat claimed that the “politicization of conversations about transgender identities is having a negative impact” on “transgender, nonbinary, and/or gender-diverse” adolescents as well as “impaired open and honest discussions about the best ways to support transgender children and adolescents.””

Be that as it may, the claim about the lack of scientific knowledge about the effects of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers is revealing since the trans agenda is based upon the idea that given the social construction of sex/gender, these alterations are not a problem. But, that is not know at present, yet the policies change on.

Dr Mercola, at a now deleted post, has given a fine one-stop shop overview of all of the parts of the globalists’ plan for a New World Order technocracy, so this discussion is worth preserving in a more open forum.  As usual the United Nations is at the forefront of setting up a world government, with its Sustainable Development goals.

While the goals seem to be about dealing with some sort of global crisis, they are so broadly defined as to be easily used to achieve further social control and power. Thus, the first goal of “no poverty’ leaves open how this is to be achieved, and be sure that they have in mind a vast wealth redistribution from the West to the Third World. The goal to advance “peaceful and inclusive societies” and “justice for all,” involves implementing a centrally controlled global system of digital identity (digital ID), as the UN has independently advanced. It will create an even more dystopian world of total control over the individual.

Ben Shapiro, political commentator has said:

““If Israel is forced to the wall, the possibility of nuclear exchange is extremely high.” Today Ben Shapiro told his audience that unless the United States provides material aid to Israel, it could find itself in a scenario where it’s nuking its neighbors.” While that seems shocking, this strategy is exactly the same one held by Russia and China, of using nukes to counter an existential threat.

As an expat, an Aussie living in America, I followed the Voice campaign with intense interest, although the heavy lifting was done by others such as the relentless James Reed at the Alor.org blog. A great effort over many months.

A nice piece was published at American Renaissance by racial realist Gregory Hood. He optimistically sees the decisive No vote as a revolt by traditional white Australia against the elite New Class. There is some truth to that, but he under-estimates the level of whites left in Australia. The Bureau of Statistics won’t tell you, merely rattling Census data, but one’s eyeballs tell the tale of “spot the whitey” in most of the large cities. Multicult Australia had no time for the Voice. Even Western Sydney voted against it. So, maybe this is a turning point for the remaining whites tottering on the abyss of racial dispossession, but we will see.

Steve Cortes has given a conservative critique of the proposal that the US should take in masses of Palestinian refugees. He puts the case for taking in no refugees at all, and his case can be applied directly to other Western countries such as Australia.

America has spent billions aiding the Middle Eastern countries, and they have done little for America. So, the least they can do now is take in their fellow Arabs, whom they support anyway. The other reasons are the crime rate, and potential terrorist acts, as it will be impossible to cull out any terrorists. Terrorists have got into America from the open southern border and they will get in through this proposed refugee program. And, America can’t afford it as most of these people, through no fault of their own, lacking language and technical skills, in an economy already under assault by AI advances, will be sadly unemployed.

While  globalism seems unbeatable, there is a case that globalism will self-destruct, like all other centralists movements have in human history, due to a type of social entropy, for the organisation has critical diseconomies built into its very conceptual framework. One case, extracted below at International Man.com, is that globalism is based around the US, and its power is beginning to collapse. It is challenged by the BRICS countries, and is likely to be exhausted by endless wars, and collapse, if not from internal chaos.

The drop in birth-rates across the West, and advanced countries in Asia, has been explained by an academic examining French history. The argument of Guillaume Blanc, a researcher with the University of Manchester, is that France was further down the path of secularisation than most other countries in Europe, and there was opposition to the dominance of the Catholic Church who were against birth control. When this dominance collapsed, the people were freer to adopt birth control and hence achieve a lower population level.

The EU, under the disguise of protecting children, is introducing laws that will erode the security protections of any encrypted messaging app – WhatsApp, iMessage, Instagram, Telegram, TikTok, and any others, to allegedly deal with people using the same apps for child pornography. The problem is that the net is cast so wide that it will eliminate legitimate uses of encryption apps, but that is the general plan. And, as noted in the exact below, the EU technocrats are opposing opposition to their law by using social media to promote the idea that the laws will not threaten privacy in any way, a blatant lie of course. It is precisely what we have come to expect from these masters of centralised power. 

https://reclaimthenet.org/eu-invasive-ad-targeting-anti-privacy-laws

Senator Alex Antic is another hero who has done great work in defence of freedom, first in the Covid tyranny, and then the Voice. I got this email from his mail out, which is his goodbye to the Voice. At least, the Voice as a constitutional referendum. But just as in the film of the Two Towers, at the end, the final battle will be one where the prime minister attempts to put through the Voice legislation anyway as just a statute, as has been done in the states. This will require a High Court challenge. Here is the Senator’s email comments:

“As we approach Referendum Day, it’s worth reflecting on what holding this referendum to amend our Constitution has managed to achieve.

The hour is getting late, and with this post voting at the polls is in full swing. But, if anyone come by here undecided, let me redirect you to a feast of articles showing that the Voice will destroy Australia as we know it, from George Christensen’s Nation First. Previously this material as not for free, but it is now, so good work George on this fight:

Some final thoughts on the Voice referendum, where one of the basic points to be pushed t he final hour before the polls end, is that the Voice is about creating racial divisions. The prime minister engaged in his version of identity politics for political gain, consistent with the socialist ideas from the present-day Labor Party and woke, black arm band history. He said that he fully endorsed The Uluru Statement from the Heart, but said that it was only one page, which would make the document innocence.

This one is interesting; an indigenous activist’s case to halt the Voice referendum, lodged before the High Court of Australia, has been thrown out, being for various reasons, a matter that the Court would not consider. The case made by the activist was tht the Voice was an attack upon Aboriginal sovereignty, and was causing mental harm. That is exactly the opposite of the line pushed by the Yes mob and our prime minister; Yes is supposed to achieve the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which affirms Aboriginal sovereignty. So, who knows what it is supposed to do? Best to follow the line of vote No and let them sort themselves out.

Say, I just finished that paragraph when I noticed a blue-haired socialist girl sitting at the computer next to me. She was working on two fliers. One was about the Voice referendum, with a big heading of RACISM, all these types know. The other was for a pro-Palestinian rally. I looked at the Voice leaflet when she got up to print the other one (yes, I know, a bit nosey), and it was about a meeting to be held next week. So, it looks like our furry socialist “friends” have seen the opinion polls and are working on plan B which is to do a big racism thing. I am so tired of socialists, Leftist and all that tripe, I mean type.

The question of women’s pay came up again this week with the Noble Prize for Economics going to Claudia Goldin for her work on women in the labour market. I raised objections to the philosophy and methodology of the research in an article, and the question of women’s so-called lower pay was addressed.

Brandon Smith has presented a thoughtful essay about the present day relevance of the Bronze Age collapse of civilisation. Today, most thinkers concerned with threats to Western civilisation compare the modern West to ancient Rome, which is reasonable. However, the Bronze Age Collapse in the region known as the Levant (now known as the Middle East), in around 1200 BC, represents a greater systems collapse of what at the time was a global society, including the Egyptians, Babylonians, Minoans, Mycenaeans, Hittites, and others.

I hate to say I said so, but, I said so. The US will be facing the nuclear might of both communist China and Russia. That was my conclusion in many Alor.org blog articles, and I see the confrontation coming soon, especially in the light of the acceleration from the  Middle East conflict. The same conclusion has been reached by The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, America’s Strategic Posture (October, 2023). The report does not comment on what seems obvious, a cooperation between the two powers, restricting things to the level of coordination. That seems to be a mistake. However, the recommendation for increased defence spending, and more nuclear weapons is welcomed news. The US simply cannot have enough nuclear weapons, and it is a pity so many resources have been wasted on woke rather than spent on weapons.

Woke things happen fast in manic Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden’s capital, will ban the use of petrol and diesel cars in most areas, beginning in 2025, with a few exceptions. This is just a model for bigger and even more tyrannical plans to achieve the sacred zero net for the cult of climate change alarmism. The push will be on for electric cars, but there is always the likelihood of making a 15-minute city, where the people will take public transport, or simply walk. This sort of thing is gaining momentum here in the UK, especially with non-white London, and it will come to your city, wherever you are in the West, including Australia unless the climate change hysteric can be successfully refuted and politically defanged:

You have to hand it to the World Economic Forum (WEF) for bare-faced cheek. First, it moves to destroy free speech, through their tireless attacks upon “misinformation,” meaning anything that the globalists elites, especially Big Pharma, do not like, and now they are setting out to rebuild trust in the media, a media compliant with their ideology. It is Marxist dialectics in action, to create a problem, a thesis, then present the anti-thesis, as a solution, and move to the next part of the endless dialectic of oppression. This seems to be one globalist organisation which knows its Marx and Engels, even if their names are never mentioned, even whispered. Marxism’s fingerprints are all over the WEF.

 https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft2489n82k&chunk.id=d0e2450&toc.depth=1&toc.id=d0e2450&brand=ucpress#:~:text=by%20positive%20science.-,Dialectics%20and%20Darwin,the%20negation%20of%20the%20negation.