Solar radiation management refers to strategies to geoengineer the climate to result in a reflection of some of the sun’s energy back into space.  This idea is getting increasing acceptance by bodies of climate scientists who take on the climatic doomsday scenario, that present polices will not stop alleged global warming.

Of course, they all assume that such warming is occurring, and that now that is a paradigm belief that is not questioned. But, even so, within their paradigm, given their assumptions, there are grave concerns by many scientists about the dangers of playing God with the climate. Scientific American, quoted below, has given a concise summary, and that includes: “It could noticeably whiten our blue sky. It could weaken the stratospheric ozone layer that protects us and Earth's biosphere from ultraviolet radiation. It might change weather patterns and move the monsoons that water crops for billions of people. And it wouldn't do anything to remedy other CO₂-related problems such as ocean acidification, which is harming the ability of corals, shellfish and some plankton to form skeletons and shells.”

The Yes political class of the Voice are already setting out the ground plan for what will be done if and when they win, which hopefully will not occur. Some sort of joint committee will be set up to oversee the Voice Advisory Group. This is the first time that details about the mechanics of the Voice have surfaced, and doing this at this late date of three weeks before the vote does not raise trust and confidence and trust.

The larger question that the No side have not addressed is that when the Voice fails, what then? My guess is that what has been done at the state level, with state Voices, could be replicated by federal legislation. Really, everything that has been canvassed with the Voice can be done without constitutional reform. That is just to show the globalists their level of subservience to woke and their agenda. So, I expect that the legislation will be pushed through late at night. We need to beware. And, that will be time for a High Court challenge to the whole grab-bag of legislation that will be served up. The battle will not be over in three weeks and one day’s time?

Leading Yes campaigners for the Voice have said that there will need to be not just one federal Voice, but numerous local Voices to give remote communities a say. That means in principle a Voice committee, paid by the tax payer for every indigenous community. How many of these are there? Thousands, tens of thousands, who knows how many? The Voicers have said that there will only be about 35 local and regional groups, but by their own arguments, that will be totally inadequate; there needs to be one Voice for each community, however defined.  What will be the cost of this, for each of these Voicers is going to have to be paid? It will be a staggering number of billions, far more than the $ 40 billion already spent on indigenous people.

The Voice, if successful, will economically cripple Australia, and destroy our standard of living. And, at the end of the day, the real disadvantaged indigenous communities, who should be helped now, will remain in poverty, while the elites get richer. That is to not even address the issue of homeless people sleeping in the streets now, mostly white.

The debate, was started by singer Kamahl, and is spreading. He claimed that the government was spending at least $40 billion a year on indigenous people. Naturally, the mainstream media denied it; no-one said that this was a good thing, and ten times that amount should be spent. The Left-wing fact checkers said that the figure was $ 4.5 billion, which is a massive amount in its own right. Sky News host Peta Credlin replied that when one considers overall budget figures, Kamahl was right. “Adjusting the 2016 figure in the Productivity Commission's report for inflation, well, that gives us now a figure of $39.5 billion in Aboriginal spending today. 

“So Kamahl last night on The Project was actually spot on with his $40 billion figure.”

Australian music icon, John Farnham, lent his song You’re the Voice to the Yes side, and they played in their ads. But, polling research has shown that the song may have had an adverse effect upon the Yes campaign, with 66 percent of undecided voters saying the song had no impact upon them at all. Why might this be?

Well the 1986 song is getting a bit old now by music standards. It;’ lyrics are a bit repetitive and it is not clear what song is actually about. It could have been used just as well be for No side:

Here is an example of technology that could blow up in one’s face, like the cartoon cigars, in a worst-case, as yet, hypothetical scenario. Molnupiravir is a drug given to vulnerable Covid suffers who may be fighting cancer or liver and kidney disease. However, wonderful as that is, there are concerns that the mechanism by which the drug works could backfire. The drug causes mutations in the virus, supposedly weakening it. But, there have been concerns raised that some that mutations may not kill off the virus, make the virus more transmissible or severe, or allow it to bypass immunity from previous infections or vaccines, or produce new variants.

Are just concerns justified? We simply do not know yet; it is yet another great unknown in Covid research. But if true, it could be a problem, depending upon what the mutated virus is like.

There were numerous reports of the ill-effects of the Covid mRNA vaxxes upon women’s menstruation cycle, and Dr Naomi Wolf is a leading figure exposing this. Bizarre things have been widely reported, such as stopped periods, ultra-heavy bleeding, even post-menopausal women, bleeding. And now the results of a large study have been published in the mainstream science journal, Nature, which links the Covid vaxxes to unexpected vaginal bleeding: “Women who don’t menstruate — including postmenopausal women and those on contraceptives — were several times more likely to experience unexpected vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination than before the vaccines were offered.” The study found that the risk of experiencing unexpected bleeding was three to five times higher in the month after vaccination.

The issue that was not explored was why this was so? What does the mRNA vax do to cause the unexpected bleeding? Normally unexpected bleeding is a matter of medical concern, so something in the vax must be doing this, no doubt, the mRNA spike protein. In a normal world, vaccines were halted which had less ill-effects than this, but with the sacred Covid shots it is full speed ahead.

There are a lot of angry fried chicken lovers who are frustrated by another KFC outlet going cashless, in the NSW town of Morisset. People are calling for a boycott, but I suppose if only those boycotting are cash with no card, it won’t get far. The card wielders will be tucking into all of that fried feast, and loving it. While it all lasts.

What we will see now is something of a death of a million cuts, as firms follow the lead and go cashless. A dummy run was made during the Covid freak-out, with fear about germs on bank notes. But now we are facing the real threat, every day. There needs to be an organised mass movement for the preservation of cash; SAVE OUR CASH!

Big Pharma is promoting its latest Covid jab, the formulated monovalent Covid shots by Pfizer and Moderna. The vaxxes are directed to Omicron variant XBB.1.5, this has now been replaced by other strains, the dominant strains right now are EG.5 and FL.1.5.1, so even if it did work, it is not known how it will act against the newest variants. But, no matter; the push will be for multiple shots of this goo as well, continuing the endless vax cycle. Pfizer’s testing involved 10 mice. Moderna tested on 50 adults, one of whom required medical attention due to an adverse event. This gives a potential serious adverse event ratio of 1 in 50, which is not a good start.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/26/mice-test-pfizer-covid-vaccine.aspx?ui=4b76ef641adf6eb9d4ff474498ab322ff93fc0a1359d95e535955e5de58beefb&sd=20190530&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1Read

So, Dan Andrews has resigned, after so many world firsts, such as staging the world’s longest Covid lockdowns in Victoria. As documented by Rebekah Barnett, it does not end there, with the Australian Financial Review saying  he “trashed Victoria’s finances,” leaving behind “a nasty financial cocktail” of debt and high borrowing costs. Now that is an achievement, so he is getting out on a high note. There is one social media post I saw saying that he will be the Australian delegate to the World Economic Forum, beginning on the 27 September 2023, today. I hope he can aid those globalists as much as he aided the state of Victoria.

And, after the lockdown misery, the majority of Victorians voted for him, so with the ideology of dumocracy, can we really complain?

This is a great concern to the rule of law, with federal judges refusing to hear cases because they may become personally liable. This fear is creating chaos in the court. The issue arose from a case where a man was wrongfully jailed by a judge on a contempt of court charge. It has held in the Federal court that the judge as personally liable.

I think this decision was wrongly decided on public interest grounds, precisely for the present situation it has created. Judges will not deliver current judgments if hey have to look over their shoulders for personal litigation.

I had hoped that the objections of 11 countries to the UN declaration on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response would slow it down, it formally having to be submitted to a vote by the full assembly. But no, the president of the UN General Assembly (UNGA), has ignored procedure, approved the document, and it moves ahead. The globalist mean business here and are determined to set up the health branch of the New World Order next year.

While the health authorities still have not come clean and stated that the MRNA spike proteins do travel around the body, lodging in organs such as the breasts and ovaries, a new study, published in the journal The Lancet, has found that mRNA from the Covid vax in breast milk. The spike proteins were present  45 hours after the jab. The authors did not see any problem with this, but did add a caution: “Although we believe breastfeeding after mRNA vaccination is safe, a dialogue between a breastfeeding mother and her healthcare provider should address the benefit/risk considerations of breastfeeding in the first two days after maternal mRNA vaccination.”

But, there is an inconsistency here, as if breastfeeding after the mRNA jab is safe, then there are no real benefit/ risk considerations. Contrary to that conclusion, the safety will be as function of the existing Covid vax safety, and that, as has been documented at this blog from summaries of numerous  reports and studies, is open to debate.

Who knows what Joe Biden was thinking when he gave his reflections on the biased presentation of multiracial couples in TV ads. He said that this was because they were selling soap. Nope, selling woke.

It is a healthy sign to see so many grassroots people of all colours, shapes and sizes coming out in the No rallies that occurred across Australia. The lamestream media did not give any supportive coverage, and from what I have read on social media, they have under-estimated the number of people who did attend. But, that is expected, the media always does this to the side it is not supporting; just look at the coverage of the US 2016 elections, where the polls and media were wrong up to the last moment, because they were hoping that by misrepresenting Trump’s support, people would not want to be on the losing side. Ha, that doesn’t even work for sports teams!

But, it matters not. The momentum is beginning to be gained by the No side despite the vast money the woke corporates have flung into the campaign for Yes. I will be laughing to see them lose their millions. They richly deserve it. As well, a  No person may no longer wish to  spend their hard-earned money with these firms, if alternatives are available. That is consumer choice, right?

I am no expert on economics, but the thought just popped into my head another reason why the banks may want to eliminate cash. Fractional reserve banking operates as follows: “Fractional-reserve banking is the system of banking operating in almost all countries worldwide, under which banks that take deposits from the public are required to hold a proportion of their deposit liabilities in liquid assets as a reserve, and are at liberty to lend the remainder to borrowers. Bank reserves are held as cash in the bank or as balances in the bank's account at the central bank. The country's central bank determines the minimum amount that banks must hold in liquid assets, called the "reserve requirement" or "reserve ratio". Most commercial banks hold more than this minimum amount as excess reserves.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking#:~:text=Fractional%2Dreserve%20banking%20is%20the,lend%20the%20remainder%20to%20borrowers.

The Senate inquiry into bank closures and cashlessness has had a public hearing at Junee, about 45 kilometres from Wagga Wagga, to get a taste of what rural Australia  thinks about the state of banking and all the agendas that are now being played out. Banks have been closing, and there was only a last-minute pause by the last remaining bank, the Commonwealth Bank. The inquiry heard from older Australians who were not fully computer illiterate, that the move to a cashless system would leave such older people vulnerable to scams and mistakes for which in the on-line world there is no forgiveness, only financial disaster. Senator Canavan said:

"There has to be a role for government oversight here … to pull in those private organisations to serve the social goods, like providing a central service," he said.

CommBank, NAB and ANZ making some of their branches cashless and Macquarie Bank has announced that its cash services would be phased out entirely by 2025. At a government inquiry the boss of the Commonwealth Banks said that there is a decreasing demand for cash, and that “transporting and making cash available around our vast country involves the considerable expense of logistics and security.” Customers are paying about $ 40 each per annum to keep cash in circulation.

First, I think we need some statistics other than from the banks about the decline of cash. Go into any supermarket, and yes, some people pay by card, but most pay by cash, so I doubt this. Second, if customers are paying, what is the big boss worrying about? Yes, they have come a long way from the early ideals discussed by D. J. Amos in The Story of the Commonwealth Bank:

The Pope has proclaimed tht there is no immigration crisis in Europe. He should spend some time on the streets of Hale, no, not Hell, Germany, where organised gangs, many composed of foreigners (around 40 percent), are targeting school children. Police are not doing much because of the fear of being called “racists.” Children are thus having to arm themselves, with what weapons they have, such as knives. With the failure of police, too woke to work, parents have organised a citizens’ defence group to fight back.

In the end, with the breakdown of the institutions of the West, people will be forced back to rely upon their own community resources, even for self-protection.

Australia continues to be sold off, and sold out by our political class. Australia is being swamp by Chinese millionaires who are profoundly impacting upon the property markets.

Australia’s Significant Investor Visa (SIV) program had allowed wealthy foreigners to purchase Australian citizenship by investing $5 million into qualifying assets or ventures, but the program is to be axed, due to concerns about money laundering and “dirty money” flows into Australia. It is hard to see how the present open border migration for the rich avoids any of the past problems. Where is the money coming from? Does the political class care? Answer; no.