It has been argued by many that climate change alarmism is a death cult. I have put this case at the blog myself. But Professor Zimmermann takes the critique to its logical conclusion, by asking, at least rhetorically, how long will it be before human sacrifices are made to the dark demon of climate change? After all, the Aztecs engaged in human sacrifice to honour their gods, and many cultures sacrifice children and virgin females, in an attempt to influence the weather. His point is that climate change alarmism has become a primitive religion, as illustrated by the environmentalist philosophy that is a version of sin and ecological repentance. And, they certainly believe that humans can control the weather, which is the key premises of climate change alarmism, that human activity is producing the eco-doomsday.

It is of course not necessary for modern environmentalists to go the full way as the ancient Aztecs did with actual physical human sacrifices. Instead, there are human sacrifices being made by the climate change agenda, involving the destruction of people’s lives by the policies of closing down farms and abandoning fossil fuels in favour of so-called renewable energy. And while actual people are not “sacrificed” yet, whales and bird life are dying from wind turbines, so here is a real death count. As depopulation is part of the climate change agenda, along with abortion on demand right up to birth in most cases, there is no doubt that more humans will die, or fail to be born, from climate change than from any other primitive practice.

https://www.rt.com/news/587544-climate-change-cult-human-sacrifice/

“History teaches us that some ancient civilisations killed their children to change the weather. They used to practice child sacrifice to appease their gods in an attempt to court their good graces. Those primitive peoples believed that through human sacrifice, the forces of nature could be coerced in their favour. For example, one of the ways the Aztecs honoured their gods was by killing people in a field with arrows so that their blood might fertilise the land.

Brian Simpson and myself have been covering the issue of cyber-attacks in Australia, which have increased by 23 percent from last year to number 94,000 reports in the 2022-2023. The most notable recent cyber-attack was the hack of Australia's second-largest port operator, DP World Australia, on November. 10.

The big news in the freedom movement at the moment is the victory of Javier Milei in becoming president of Argentina. Milei is like Donald Trump on steroids, highly manic and energetic. He did electoral promotions with a working chainsaw, indicting his plans to slash government spending. Milei is the first libertarian president the world has seen, and his program is to wind back government to the basic “night watchman” level, only doing basic things that free market fails to deliver in. He was featured in one advertisement, standing by a big white board and tearing off labels like “diversity and women” and tossing them away. In short, all the woke programs will get the chop if he has his way.

Igor Chudov has documented the chilling facts behind the World Economic Forum and UN proposal to reduce the number of births over the next 70 year from 130 million to 24 million per year. As he shows, the organisation Earth4All, a think tank that sprang from the Club of Rome, is also championing this agenda, one which the Club of Rome had.  Earth4All wants a reduction of childbirths by 81 percent by the year 2100 compared to the present level. They have a comprehensive agenda which involves first a massive transfer of resources from the West to the Third World, as increasing wealth levels will supposedly reduce the birth rate. And as well as part of this, the program requires replicating the strategy which has been done in the West of “empowering” women, so that they are working in the workforce and to busy to worry about having children.

This succeeded in the West, but I doubt it will do much in African nations like Nigeria, as the population momentum is now too great.

There is now a whole new class of “vaccines,” or more precisely gene therapy, called “Immunization DNA,” iDNA. The mRNA gene therapies, called vaccines, used against Covid, are based upon only the spike protein components. But now with iDNA, there is encoding for the entire virus. What this means is that now the cells produce the whole virus, not a part of it, but it is supposedly attenuated, rendered harmless. Or so Big Pharma says.

However, as Dr Mercola points out, all of these alleged safety proclamations were made with the mRNA vaxxes as well, but it is now known that the mRNA does not stay at the injection site and has affected millions with adverse effects. As Dr Mercola notes, if here could be these problems with a mere part of the virus being made by the human cells, then there is likely to be even more issues with the whole kitchen, or lab, sink.  

Breitbart had an interesting story, based upon material from the new book, Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life (2023), detailing how World Economic Forum leader Klaus Schwab jointly formed this organisation (his partner soon resigned in disgust), starting with only $ 6,000 in seed money in 1971. The World Economic Forum has since grown in its globalist evil to get $ 390 million per annum. It does a lot of damage to freedom with that, to be sure. As they note: “The market capitalization of WEF’s top members—corporate behemoths like Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google, Comcast, and Pfizer—tops $10 trillion. Double that if you include $10 trillion-asset manager BlackRock, whose founder and CEO Larry Fink is a WEF board member. So, with more than $20 trillion—greater than the GDP of every nation in the world except that of the United States—sloshing around in its member coffers, it is easy to grasp why the WEF is able to exert extraordinary influence.”

I came across this opinion piece, which while not being exactly new in its sentiments, is a very good summary of what has happened over the Covid years, and the likely shape of things to come without the public waking up to the fact that like the proverbial frogs in water over a heater, they are being slowly cooked. As noted, the authorities treated Covid as a new Black Death, even though its mortality rate was around 99 percent survivable for most people not aged over 80 years of age, or immune suppressed. On that flawed basis, under influence of the communist Chinese (who gave the West Covid in the first place from their Wuhan bioweapons lab) via the World Health Organization, the most draconian attack upon civil liberties ever seen in Australia’s history began.

Cairnsnew.com reproduces some thoughtful comments by Senator Price, who did such great work opposing the Voice referendum, with her comments that the prime minister has not learnt anything from the failure of the Voice referendum. True indeed. But as I see it, it is not a matter of the prime minister attempting to act to serve the Australian people. That is not what the modern system is about, with a few exceptions such as Senator Price. It is all about serving the real masters, the globalists of organisations such as the United Nations.

The radical climate protest groups seem to be well funded, unlike our side of politics which struggles to get by. So where does the money come from? George Soros? Maybe. But an investigation by the Telegraph, who is good on these things, has uncovered a whole gang of British billionaires who have been bankrolling the zero net mania to the tune of multi-million-dollar donations.

British financier Sir Christopher Hohn has donated more than £670 million to climate issues from his philanthropic fund in less than a decade. He along with Michael Bloomberg, a former New York mayor, have funded the C40 cities network, which are cities who have mayors who agree with radical climate policies, such as seen with London mayor Sadiq Khan, who has called for people to eat less meat, give up their private cars, all in aid of dealing with a supposed climate crisis.

Not only are South African farmers subjected to farm invasions, but now, as part of the government plan to drive them off the land to be replaced by Blacks, white farmers are banned from exports unless having a Black partner. It is but one more example of the South African government’s racist policies which are far worse than anything seen back in the apartheid era. And, it will further cripple South African agriculture, which already has had racial impositions made upon it, such as regulations that came into force in in May this year giving racial quotas for the use of water. Enterprises which use or store water will not be granted water licences unless they have a Black shareholding of between 25 and 75 percent. It goes on and on.

As I have said, if white farmers could gain access to say Russia or South America to start all-over again, even walking away with nothing, it would be better than slowly being wiped out here. South Africa is a lesson in anti-white racism and the mania of diversity that should be a telling lesson to the West of what is in store down the track when whites in Western countries become minorities.

Along with governments being in hock to Big Pharma, Big Tech is probably even more controlling. Thus, when 5G tech was rolled out, the governments proclaimed that there were no health issues here, nothing to see. Wherever the global corporate elites have profits to be made, expect “our” governments to be compliant to their every whim.

It was inevitable that the two recent obsessions of the ruling elites, Covid and climate change would join up. These scams are both of importance for advancing a one world government, at least controlling the West in a New World Order. But there are other aspects to this as well, as the Covid plandemic ideology and climate change can be used to cover for each other. Thus, suppose that the mRNA vaxxes are flawed and really have led to the excess deaths seen since the vax rollout. How does the system explain this, when they themselves admit that the deaths are not from Covid, for to do so would be to admit that the vaccination program was a failure?

The vibe of the time, at least since the Covid plandemic, has been the dismantling of liberal democratic traditions, in favour of the model of governance offered by communist China, as progress to a one world, New World Order. This reworking of the Western philosophical ethos will not happen overnight, but it is being done at a rapid pace none the less.

Thus, today at the blog James Reed covers the totalitarian ramifications of the Albo Labor government’s Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, which will effectively eliminate free speech on the internet. The government here is making no effort to hide its intentions, as it considers activities such as questioning the safety to the Covid vaxxes to be beyond the pale, and even opposes an investigation into Australia’s excess death rate. As well, it would certainly consider proposals that the Covid virus was not a natural evolutionary product, but came from a bioweapons lab, alarming disinformation too. In fact, this is a government which did not, and has not challenged communist China about its illegal sonic attack upon Australian navy divers, so expect the worst.

Nick Cater, senior fellow at the Menzies Research Centre, has given a sound critique of the Albo Labor government’s Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. This Bill has been shelved for reworking to deal with religious issues, but we are not told exactly what. The evil Greens want this already totalitarian piece of legislation made even more evil. Thus, The Australian Communications and Media Authority will act as judge, jury and executor of what counts as legitimate speech, and will enforce this by massive fines to social media companies to do the suppression themselves. We can be sure that to keep on the safe side, the companies will go into panic overdrive and censor more aggressively than the government would if it was itself doing the foul deed. It is sinister, indeed.

Jo Nova makes the telling point that communist China merely gives lip service to the climate change agenda, championed by the West, and in any case, the UN and other organisations define China as “developing,” and hence free from the impositions the globalists are imposing upon Western countries. In fact, China is, unlike the West, accelerating its building of coal-fired power stations, clearly indicating that emperor Xi had no intention of keeping his pledge to phaseout coal. China is building six times more cola fired power plants than the rest of the world, around two such plants per week, which is an extraordinary achievement:

The Albo government waited until after the conclusion of APEC to let the public know that divers with the Royal Australian Navy suffered injuries after being attacked by sonic pulses from a communist Chinese warship. This attack occurred of the coast of Japan on November 14, before the PM Albo left to attend APEC. This was done in international waters. If the sides were reversed and Australia did this to the Chinese, I expect that it would be seen as an act of war. Wars have started for less.

As Malcolm Roberts rightly points out, it is about time our political leaders started protecting Australian interests, rather than bowing to communist China, in cringing, embarrassing acts of appeasement, which emperor Xi would simply laugh at.

John Derbyshire, now an American, but born in Britain, reports quite accurately on the state of my depressing homeland, Britain. There is nothing particularly new which I have not covered in my blogs; the open border situation, the social welfare system laid out for illegals, the tide of woke. Things like the police championing anti-white racism, are not discussed, but one can only write so much about this misery before one’s brain fogs over. So, here is his summary on the end of Britain. It is not as if we have not been warned, warned since the “rivers of blood” speech by Enoch Powell, April 20, 1968: “As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see 'the River Tiber foaming with much blood'.”

https://vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-lessons-from-britain-s-national-extinction-its-deep-state-is-as-bad-as-ours?scroll_to_paragraph=14

Socialists almost destroyed what was once the richest country in South America, Argentina, and they have still been at work, with the government of now former President Alberto Fernández, producing “unprecedented economic crisis, fuelling skyrocketing inflation, joblessness, and social anxiety,” in short, social chaos. In this environment the colourful Javier Milei, a libertarian freedom candidate arrived on the scene, and as the clear underdog, look on the giants and cut them down to size. That is an intentional metaphor as Milei often did campaign promotions where he waved around a moving chain saw, somewhat dangerously, cutting things up. It made an impression.

Hopefully, his election will be part of a new wave across the planet of freedom candidates. We expect Milei to pull out of the World Health Organization for starters. If he is sincere he will begin the pushback against the UN and World Health Organization agendas on health and digital identity. It will be a good start, hopefully joined by a return of Donald Trump in 2024, who may this time do something against the globalists. 

While freedom movement types cite freely 1984 by George Orwell, which probably few of them have read, a lesser know dystopian fiction is Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World written in 1932. Huxley speculated about future tyrannies, and he saw the threat of technocracy being primarily. People may not be controlled by the iron fist as in 1984, but by the syringe, drugs and brainwashing.

The push is on to establish a National Firearms Register, following the tragic murder of two police officers. For the legacy media it seems that if such a register existed, where police in any Australian state could access via the tap of a few computer keys, all the firearms details about any firearms owner in any state, terrible crimes like this would be prevented. That point is delusional, as while such a register, to cost a cool $ 200 million plus, would give information, that X owns a firearm, so what? How exactly would that help, since surely police tactics would assume that any suspect was armed anyway?

I note in particular the spin given in the article: “three religious extremists, none of whom were ­legally allowed to possess the ­arsenal of high-powered weapons and stockpile of ammunition they had hoarded on the remote property, more than 300km west of Brisbane. Shooter Nathaniel Train’s Queensland gun licence had been suspended four months earlier, and his brother, Gareth Train, and Gareth’s wife, Stacey Train, were not licensed to own or shoot firearms at all.” So, the criminals were not in lawful possession of firearms. Well, shouldn’t police had removed the guns from them sooner, taking all precautions of course, that is going fully armed to the premises, with plenty of backup officers? Nothing wrong with that, it is just sound situational awareness.