The Tale of the Autopsies By Brian Simpson

Dr Peter McCullough has published a paper discussing the evidence related to autopsy findings in death after Covid vaccination. They examined every published autopsy report in a leading medical journal reference data base, and then independently adjudicated each death from the data. On this basis they concluded that 73.9 percent of deaths after vaccination are either direct due or significantly contributed to by mechanisms resulting from Covid vaccines.

While that is an important result in itself, what is also of interest, is that the paper was then labelled by so-called fact checkers as false news, even though the paper had been peer reviewed. This shows as Dr McCullough says, “that our paper is devastating to the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex pulling the strings of an army of fact checkers, social media bots, editors, and publishers. They are hell-bent on blocking or discrediting the truth on vaccine side effects in order to push the global lockstep “safe and effective” false narrative.”

 

Where there is big money involved, just expect this.

 

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings

 

“By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of disease. I graduated with a degree in this field from the University of Michigan. Nearly a year ago, Nicolas Hulscher, a current graduate student at U of M was credited with an approved project “Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination” with myself as the senior mentor.

The formal process of epidemiological investigation is rigorous and disciplined. In essence, we searched for and obtained every published autopsy report in PUBMED and then independently adjudicated each death from extracted data. Our conclusion was 73.9% of deaths after vaccination are either direct due or significantly contributed to by known mechanisms (myocarditis, blood clots, etc.) resulting from COVID-19 vaccines. The conclusion is supported by the data presented.

The peer-review process for this paper includes a review and acceptance of the paper to the University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Poster Session which was held November 17, 2023. Nic stood by the poster, described his study, and answered questions from students and faculty. The paper was vetted and well received.

Currently, the full-length manuscript is listed on the European Commission preprint server while it goes through the publication process at a major journal. In my experience this can take up to 2-4 years.

I found it ironic that while our paper was making it through these steps, Health Feedback, the fact-check blogging site posted this false claim attached to our graphical abstract in social media.

Who wrote this? What are their credentials? What motivated Health Feedback to do this? Who directed them to our paper? The short answer is that our paper is devastating to the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex pulling the strings of an army of fact checkers, social media bots, editors, and publishers. They are hell-bent on blocking or discrediting the truth on vaccine side effects in order to push the global lockstep “safe and effective” false narrative.”

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 29 April 2024

Captcha Image