A grassroots team, Dilley Meme Team’s Lauren3ve, have put together a political ad for Trump that covers everything that has happened since the stolen 2020 election. The work was not paid for by the Trump campaign, and shows what a dedicated team of individuals can do. I hope something like this can be put together in Australia for the Voice campaign. You need to show the Marxist agenda behind it. There should be footage available. The ordinary voters need to get a taste of what the globalist lap dogs in parliament have in store. 

Jason Aldean’s song, Try That in a Small Town, which was an attack upon the anarchy of the antifa riots of 2020, would probably have just remained at number 35, before falling, on the Country record charts. But, the white liberals could not tolerate it, and had the song banned from play. That threw a tiger amongst the liberal pigeons, and now the song has shot to number 2 on Billboard’s Hot 100 list. And, for music, that is big time, better than Taylor Swift! Naturally the white liberals proclaimed that the song as racist, portraying Blacks committing crimes. But numerous Black commentators on YouTube pointed out that this was absurd, as most of the footage was of crazed white antifa.

The best the woke could come up with was that the footage showed the courthouse of Maury County, and back in the day of 1927 a Black was lynched there. Well, it is most unlikely that the musicians knew about that, and lynchings of Whites by Blacks also occurred. Showing the court house, even if intentional, does not endorse lynching, since the point can be made that the 1927 act was a great injustice, just like the 2020 antifa acts. Both were along the same lines of vigilante “justice.” And, if the court house was so offensive, it should have been pulled down long ago, like the White House should have been!

Gregory Hood, writing at American Renaissance.com, gives his take from America on the Australian voice referendum. There is nothing new as such tht we have not covered, but he piece is a nice one, as it cuts to the chance of the issue here, an gives an outsider’s view. Here it is: “It’s easy to predict what a Voice will do. It will be a permanent political base for Indigenous activists to complain about inequalities. These inequalities are biological and therefore permanent, so there will be ever more ambitious “solutions” proposed in defiance of reality, with symbolic gestures and “official advice” turning into accusations that white Australians have no right to be there. The Voice will have constitutional status, so the least damaging outcome will be a state-recognized ethnic lobby that can never be eliminated. The worst outcome would be that Parliament and the High Court gradually give it powers that naïve “Yes” voters never imagined, just as American civil rights law ultimately overwhelmed foundational constitutional protections.”

It really will be the abolition of the Australia that we know.

Only months ago, the mainstream dismissed the idea that general AI would be replacing journalism. But now the technocrats at Google have announced that they are working on AI to write news stories. It is being tested now. At first, I was concerned about this, but deeper thought led me to stop worrying on this one, as most of the mainstream media journalists are little more than robots anyway, and being replaced by real robots is probably neither here nor there in the scheme of things now.

https://www.technocracy.news/google-is-developing-ai-to-write-news-stories/

Henry Ergas has zeroed in on the fundamental problem with the Yes case for the Voice. The issue is, that while the details of how the Voice will operate in fine detail are being kept by the prime mister under wraps until the thing is in, he hopes, in which case we will find out why it is a bad idea to sign blank cheques, the Voice by definition will give a special racial status to one ethno-racial group, the indigenous. It will be discrimination by race. The Yes side may argue that this is necessary to right historical wrongs, but that has not been shown, and such programs elsewhere in the world, have created division, and have not generated equity; instead they have rewarded a New Class who reap the benefits of these racial schemes.

The No case is consistent with the liberal democratic ideal of equality of all citizens.

Mark Powell, continues the excellent coverage the Spectstor.com is giving to the Voice referendum issue, with the highest quality journalism bringing critical awareness of the issues that is not seen in the rest of the press. Powel says that we can see where the Voice will take Australia, if successful by the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws of Western Australia. He discusses in detail how there was a plan to plant 5,500 shrubs and trees, presumably for carbon reductions. B Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation demanded $2.5 million in exchange for its approval!  The decision was reversed after the public jumped up and down. There have been other stories like this as well, but he message is clear that the more powerful voice will not be so easily controlled.

The Covid controversies may have fallen from the public eye, but they still continue. Thus, an Australian doctor, Dr. William Bay, spoke out about the side effects of the Covid vaxxes. He received a medical registration suspension notice from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in 2022. He then filed a lawsuit against the AHPRA, the Medical Board of Australia and the state government to Queensland’s Supreme Court in November 2022, and then applied to have the case heard by he High court of Australia. This application was rejected on technicalities, but Dr Bray has appealed that and the case now awaits to see if the defendants contest the appeal.  As the unconstitutionality of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law is now being challenged, this case will be a significant one for the future if he wins.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/australian-doctor-suspended-for-saying-covid-19-vaccine-is-dangerous-appeals-high-courts-decision_5413560.html?utm_content=buffer9f9db&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=epochtimesaus&fbclid=IwAR1Oa9EBoxpr8LQyxQVbKOU6KCr_fDBrzCZpc6bZKnOzwBpk2VB1PlgemfQ

Here is, for reference purposes, a summary of a recent academic article from the Institute of Economic Affairs, assessing the effects of the Covid lockdowns upon Covid-19 mortality. It is a meta-analysis, meaning a lot of studies are examined and statistical methods used to formulate a type of overview. The short of the long is that “lockdowns in the spring of 2020 had a negligible effect on COVID-19 mortality. This result is consistent with the view that voluntary changes in behaviour, such as social distancing, did play an important role in mitigating the pandemic.”

This is still important for us to be aware of, because the likes of Bill Gates, have expressed certainty that there will be another “pandemic,” perhaps sooner that most people would expect. My guess is that one will be planned to allow mail voting fraud for the 2024 US election. The elites, having succeed in putting the population in cages once, will do so again.

Before writing this story, I saw the news flash that a high tech communist Chinese spy ship was outside of Australian territorial waters, probably observing the military drills of the international Talisman Sabre military exercise. This is going to be standard stuff from now on.

But, there is much worse as far as communist Chinese vessels goes. China’s strategy of controlling the global seafood supply now seems to be to create giant floating cities, such as the one now of the coast of Argentina. The present vessel is larger than Washington DC. The floating city supplies Chinese fishing vessels which drain entire areas of fish, leading to extinction and ecological deserts. Then the city moves on. It has been predicted that the entire South Atlantic will be extinct of fish within the space of only a few years.

The West through the ideology of woke has embraced almost the entire package of goods that the USSR embodied at its worse; it has not taken the iron fist approach so much as the silk chains. While the Soviets used psychiatry as a political weapon, to enforce communist dogma and state obedience, the US is now moving to mental health round-ups and involuntary detentions.

At present in New York City, for example, one could be hospitalised for having a suspected mental illness for having “firmly held beliefs not congruent with cultural ideas,” exhibit a “willingness to engage in meaningful discussion,” have “excessive fears of specific stimuli,” or refuse “voluntary treatment recommendations.” This is little more than a thought crime, and  not only in New York but across the country, the police are now empowered to detain individuals they believe to be mentally ill, based solely on their own judgment. Be sure that refusing vaccination will be taken as a clear sign of mental illness.

We have been reporting on transhumanism, the idea that the human species will be merged with artificial intelligence to create homo sapiens 2.0, and then the replacement of human biology by cyborgs. That seems far-fetched, but one needs only reflect upon what the Dr Frankensteins have done over the last 50 years or so with biotechnology, to take this all very seriously.

So, for example, here is an Australian example. The Office of National Intelligence has given an Australian research team $ 600, 000 to research into how human brain cells could be merged with artificial intelligence, to integrate the fields of artificial intelligence and synthetic biology to create “programmable biological computing platforms.” The idea is to achieve a synthetic biological intelligence, so far only featured in science fiction, to surpass silicon-based hardware. The human brain excels at lifetime learning, an evolutionary development, while AI is not so good at this, so the merger will apparently transcend present limits. “The outcomes of such research would have significant implications across multiple fields such as – but not limited to – planning, robotics, advanced automation, brain-machine interfaces, and drug discovery, giving Australia a significant strategic advantage.” So, they say.

When I see material on the limits of electric vehicles, I post it, since this is the spearhead of the globalist/Green push for the elimination of petrol and diesel cars. Do not under-estimate what they are set to do, with many jurisdictions planning bans of conventional cars by 2030, and there is one plan for a ban on new petrol cars for Australia by 2035:

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8017931/call-to-ban-petrol-car-sales-by-2035/

London mayor, Sadiq Khan is always on the lookout from some new woke scheme to try out on the majority non-white population of London. The latest is the “Maaate” campaign against so-called toxic masculinity. It features advertisements where men are supposed to callout other men who use such phrases as “boys will be boys,” calling women “drama queens” and thinking men and women are different. These are all examples of hateful misogyny. It is ironic that this sort of nonsense is pushed, when the grooming gangs, and rape of British children continues to this day:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-child-sex-abuse-b2004963.html

Honest presidential candidate Robert Kennedy appeared before an extraordinary House hearing on censorship and the role the federal US government played in forcing social media companies to ban content, especially over the Covid plandemic. What was ironic is that the members openly acted to suppress Kennedy at the meeting, first moving to stop him from speaking at all, then trying to prevent the public from hearing him speak, and when he was speaking, shouting over him, abusing him and defaming him. It was extraordinary stuff, which all goes to prove the point at issue, that the politicians are not in office, as they see it, to serve the people, and protect liberal democratic values, but rather to act for the interests of those funding their re-election, such as Big Pharma.

Here is why a nodding awareness of what the scientists are up to is important, as they are working away to change the human essence. Take the recent announcement that the Dr Frankensteins are literally on the way to making man, to take a human stem cell, and transfer it into a human egg. That egg can then be fertilised with human sperm, although there are moves to artificially produce sperm as well.  The technology is justified for its social utility, such as also being used to create sperm for lesbian couples, so that they can have babies with genes from both women, and transgender couples could also use the technology to have biologically related babies.

Comparisons have often been made between the fall of Rome and what is believed to be the coming fall of the American empire which is seemingly accelerating.  Both empires faced mass immigration which radically transformed the ethnic profile. This is occurring now with the US rapidly becoming not merely non-European, but non-white in terms of the majority demographics. For Rome, this breakdown in national cohesion was one factor lading to the relative ease of the Germanic “barbarians” successfully raiding and destroying Rome, as detailed by Peter Heather in The Fall of the Roman Empire.  “Like Rome by the end of the 4th century and into the 5th century, the USA is in decline.  We can expect a collapse of our dominant role in the near future.  Our society is divided beyond repair.  Even without a civil war, the division itself bespeaks extreme weakness.  The God of the Holy Bible is no longer the clear God of our country.  Godless and immoral elements supported now by one of our two great political parties have set up a barrier to compromise, and the Republicans are too weak and accommodating to restore national unity.”

An essay well worth reading that elaborates in great detail on these themes is Michael Anton, “The Pessimistic Case for the Future.” The focus of these writers is upon the US, which is at the leading edge of decline, but he same forces are acting across the West, in Australia as well.

Back in the day, before becoming president. Donald Trump said that the vaccines were probably causing autism. Of course, the main controversy was with Dr Andrew Wakefield, who with co-workers published an article in a leading British medical journal claiming a causal link between various vaccinations and a condition linked to autism. Apparently, the research was not replicated and there was a controversy regarding his alleged conflicts of interest. Wakefield has defended himself in numerous forums, including a 2010 book by, Skyhorse Publishing, Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines. 

According to a Mid-Western Doctor, the evidence has moved on since then, with the vaccines being the only real common cause reason for the explosion of autism tht has occurred, it is alleged. The smoking gun is that regressive autism almost always occurs shortly after vaccination, and not before. This is prima facie evidence of causation. Further evidence is summarised below. It is a major issue as it raises major doubts about the vaxxes.

The latest Australian law suit relevant to the Covid vaxxes relates to a suit against Pfizer, Moderna, and others:  Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Anor, filed in Australia’s Federal Court on July 6, 2023. The claim is that the mRNA vaccines are a genetically modified organisms, or GMO, and that regulations about such products have not been followed, “they have failed to apply for the necessary licenses.” This is allegedly in violation of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (GT Act). Central to the case will be the argument that the mRNA vax satisfies the definition of genetically modified orgasm under that Act. A genetically modified organism (GMO) is:

• a plant, animal or other organism that has been modified using gene technology
• an organism that has inherited modified traits from a GMO.

The issue would be if the mRNA vax itself is genetically modified, which I think it is, and is an “organism” which does not seem to be so. It is a biological substance, but will that be covered by the Act? That is what the case will be about. It will be significant since it will show that the mRNA vax is substantially different from previous vaxxes.

If we can believe the survey, this is shocking, and will require some thinking, even rethinking. The Pew Research Center, a Washington think tank conducted an online poll covering over 5,000 US adults. It found that the majority of those surveyed did not support the First Amendment protections for free speech. In particular,  55 percent of people  held that the government should restrict “false” information online, even if doing so prevents people from “publishing or accessing information.” 55 percent of Americans said in response to the poll. Only 42 percent disagreed. The opposition to free speech came primarily from Democrat voters rather than conservatives. This is an indication of the in-roads that the Left have made into culture, having now established a hegemony.

It is necessary to make progress in opposing this, as the enemy is growing stringer by the day. The opposition should have happened long ago, but it seems conservatives only really fight hard in the 11^th hour. My guess is that here would be a similar result if people were polled in Australia, but there does not seem to be a parallel survey.

Adam Creighton has presented a spirited defence of US presidential candidate Robert Kennedy. It seems that the mainstream media has a new object of hate, beyond Donald Trump. Kennedy, although from the Left breaks up the establishment narrative. He is pro-climate change, but rejects the globalist, anti-Western responses, seeing free enterprise and improved technology as the answer, which will not harm anyone, and can only be seeds of the good. As well, he is against open borders immigration, contrary to the mainstream Democrats.

And, beyond all, he is the leading vax critic in America. A Kennedy president would be good for the world, as he is an old school statesman. One feels this from listening to his talks. I am pleased to see that at least one mainstream journalist agrees with some of this take. “Kennedy is asking the right questions at the right time. How anyone can observe the past 3½ years and give our institutions – which collectively have trashed human rights, created high inflation and pushed the world towards war – a big tick is beyond me. Polls give him up to 20 per cent support among Democrats, perhaps even more among Republicans, who are drawn to his free-speech credentials if not so much his zeal to protect the environment. If he runs as an independent after losing the Democratic nomination, he could cause havoc for the major parties, and encourage more Americans to question the increasingly insidious relationship between powerful corporations and government, by far the biggest problem of our age.”