The environmentalists, and especially the climate change hysterical version, have made numerous predictions of doom, which, fortunately have not come true. It was global cooling in the 1970s, then morphing to global warming in the 1980s. Throughout that time, the population issue got a regular outing, with the likes of Paul Ehrlich who in his best-selling book, The Population Bomb (1968) had predicted a Malthusian crash of population within a few years because of a shortage of food. That proved to be spectacularly wrong, but Ehrlich is still at it making a similar prediction of global doom due to biodiversity decline. It seems that what matters here is the fear factor, to keep the population in a state of high anxiety, so by a diabolical dialectics, the “solution” can be offered to these non-problems, which always involves less freedom and more globalist control. The present use of climate change mania, to limit cars, meat and farming is a prime example.

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/failed-climate-predictions

The Midwestern doctor.com, has another challenging post on the dark, or is it darker side of vaccination, how there has been an historical link between vaccination campaigns, especially in the Third World, and a decline in fertility? Of course, at present there is a debate among Covid vax critics about exactly what effects the spike proteins are having on fertility of women right across the world, with many jurisdictions reporting significant drops in fertility. As well, there has been a rise in miscarriage rates in many regions. Abnormal menstruation has become common, and that too affects fertility. While in the past there was a principle to spare pregnant women from any medication with these sorts of risks, during Covid there was a frantic drive to vaccinate all pregnant women, which is highly suspicious. Surely Big Pharma could forgo that tiny bit of profit, or was there more to it, as Dr Naomi Wolf contends, a clear depopulation agenda?

While that may sound paranoid to normies, the history of vaccination, as summarised below indicates that there were numerous cases of vaccines being deliberately used as fertility control. If this was done in the past, there is no reason to suppose, given the existence of the same anti-population philosophies, that it would not be tried again today, but on a bigger scale.

Hands up everyone who thought the Australian intelligence agencies were supposed to be concerned with protecting Australia from foreign powers such as communist China, which has said that Australia is now in their gun sights, because of the defence pact AUKUS? Well, it seems that the parliament, read Labor Party, wants the intelligence agencies to go after on-line “misinformation.” That is said to be a grave threat to Australia’s security, according to the Joint Parliamentary Committee for Intelligence and Security.

There is no holding back now, and Covid claims were seen as fuelling this misinformation. And what exactly was the “misinformation”? That is defined, as we saw in the government policies, as anything that was contrary to the Covid mandates. Opposing masks, lockdowns, and especially the sacred vax all qualify; no matter that there is a mountain of evidence now to show that the real misinformation was from the government, since lockdowns and masks did not stop the transmission of Covid.

This issue has many “pure bloods,” people who rejected all of the Covid vaxxes, concerned. A recently published academic medical article has shown that people who have been vaccine with the Covid shots can spread mRNA-based antibodies to unvaccinated people via aerosols. Experiments found on the masks of the vaccinated, immune system-produced proteins, and other tests showed an aerosol transmission of antibodies between parents and children, the parents being, presumably vaccinated, and the children, not. Natural News.com sees this as a mass contamination problem, and this would be so given the vast majority of people have been vaxxed. Yet, it seems to me that coming into contact with such aerosols is little different from coming into contact with the Covid virus itself. It is very different from having a Covid mRNA vax, which causes the body itself to produce billions of spike proteins.

Unz.com has a good historical article detailing how Britain became in the post-World War II period an immigration sink, just like most of the West. The central argument focusses upon the Left in the Labour party, who wanted to rub diversity in the face of conservatives. Tony Blair’s government embraced mass immigration of non-whites as an affirmation of globalist and cosmopolitan values, cherished by the chattering class. While I agree with this, what is missing is the role that big business plays in pumping immigration; if it was just the Left New Class rattling on about this it would not be as difficult to defeat. Australia offers an even cleared example, where big business at present is calling the shots in a catch-up due to immigration restrictions over Covid. There is a massive housing crisis, but the sharks in the real estate business rejoice about this as competition for a basic necessity such as housing delivers more profits to their greedy hands. And, immigration is the tool for this.

As well, present day immigration in the best serves the agenda of white racial replacement, so it is not surprising tht it has become the religion of the Left and big business.

It would have been better for the world if Bill Gates had just stuck with computers. In recent times Gates has had a major impact upon food policy, especially with a push for genetically modified organisms (GMOs).  Through his Foundation he has invested in agribusiness companies who have been producing bioengineered crops, even though the evidence indicates that there are substantial health issues associated with such crops. Gates’ Foundation has been supporting the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), which is also promoting the use of GMO crops. Gates has invested in artificial lab-grown meat, and mRNA vaccines for livestock. It is hard to find a technocratic agenda centred around vaxxes, that Gates is not involved in. And, for him, it is early days yet, with no George Soros-like retirement for decades.

https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/how-bill-gates-has-invested-billions

The latest indictment of President Trump over the January 6 peaceful protests, has Trump facing the possibility of the death sentence for allegedly sparking the January 6 event, even though Trump told everyone to go home. No matter, he must now be eliminated at all costs. But the Trump trial must show that Trump himself did not believe that the election was stolen, something impossible to show because he does believe this, as do about one third of the US population.

Paul Craig Roberts wades in on the Trump persecution via lawfare by the Department of Injustice. Trump, unlike Joe Biden, has committed no crime, but corrupt Democrat officials are acting to eliminate a political candidate who is otherwise likely to win the US 2024 election. It is incredible stuff, showing how a once first world nation can sink to Third World banana republic status in just a few years. Indeed, the charges resemble the Stalin purge trials of the 1930s, but with even less credibility. Thus, the latest charges relating to doubts Trump raised about the results of the 2020 election would in a sane age be regarded as a legitimate part of political debate, especially when there are grounds for thinking this. But, that then becomes a crime.

Recently there has been many disclosures from the US government of extra-terrestrial alien space ships crashing, even with bodies being found. The reports come from government insiders, who, conveniently cannot give hard evidence, which is classified, even though they are talking about this. It is odd that so-called advanced civilisations have so many crashes.

A psychology educator David Hundsness, who made a career in criticizing “conspiracy theorists,” explains that conspiracy theories appeal to segments of the population who believe that they are independent thinkers seeking the truth: “People who believe conspiracy theories believe they are in a special group of independent thinkers who know the truth. They think they have a superior knowledge while the majority of people are just sheep who are foolishly gullible and easily manipulated, and who wouldn't want to feel special. Let's start with an easy example. Imagine someone who wasn't particularly successful in school or their career. So deep down, their ego feels inferior. But if they believe the conspiracy theories, well, now they feel like they're smarter than most others, and a small group of people tell them so.”

Coming from the mainstream, naturally he proclaims that these conspiracy theorists are wrong. Yet, many conspiracy theories in recent times have turned out to be true, while initially rejected, such as the lab leak origin hypothesis of Covid. The idea that groups of powerful people work together, usually in secret, is a much more plausible theory of history, than what Eric butler called the idiot theory of history, that things just happen, with no relevant causes. That is not science at all.

I was delightfully surprised to find my very favourite Russian, Igor Chudov, commenting on the evolution of an Australia conspiracy theory. Actually, something that the mainstream at one point derided as a Right-wing conspiracy theory at one point, and a little later, the same issue was portrayed as a fact, with no retraction of the previous position. The issue in question is the Australian government moving to seek an end to cash. This idea was supposedly debunked, only to find four months later that the plan all along was for cash withdrawals will be halted or limited, banknotes removed from circulation, and bank branches will go cashless, and we should love it and thank the government on bended knee. This, of course is Australia’s move to Central Bank digital currencies (CBDC). But the example nicely illustrates how the media play with facts as it suits the globalist agenda.

https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/evolution-of-conspiracy-theories

This note needs to be read alongside Ken Grundy’s excellent piece today. There is a report that the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act, that came into effect on 1 July 2023, may be scrapped. The back story seems to be that this has given too much away about what the Voice will do, so, best not scare the punters at this stage of the game. Here is what we know at present; fingers crossed.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-06/was-wa-cultural-heritage-act-canned-after-albanese-voice-sway/102693550

Dear Editor

Here is the latest update on the Voice referendum and it is good news. It looks like, if things continue as they are, the Voice will be defeated. It is popular with the young, which is a good reason why the voting age should never have been set for teenagers. Still, if the pressure is kept up, that may not matter. The main issue is the impact social media is going to have, but again, that is a largely youth thing. But, the campaigning should not slacken off given these results as these nasty things tend to bop up at the end, like plastic waste pushed underwater.  

Professor John Mearsheimer is one of the few US academic taking an objective approach to the Ukraine war. He has given an instructive interview with Canadian writer and journalist, Aaron Maté.  In a nutshell, NATO has become obsessed with expansion, even though a previous promise was made to Russia not to do so. And, Russia’ position on the matter was dismissed. There was no attempt to get a neutrality deal for the Ukraine. So, why was this so? According to Professor Mearsheimer: “I suspect it’s a combination of stupidity, ignorance, cynicism, greed, bloody-mindedness, narcissism, sadism, contempt, misanthropy, and recklessness—in a word, depravity. Holders of high political office who prefer to send hundreds of thousands of young men to their deaths without at least trying diplomacy are simply terrible people in every respect.”

What he did not say, is the US neo cons, and Leftist Democrats really do want war with Russia, even if it goes nuclear. It is the same madness that was behind the “Russia stole the 2016” election mania.

The Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, led by epidemiologist Professor Tony Blakely, in an article in the Medical Journal of Australia, has offered support for the idea that permanent masks in public in Victoria may be the best way of preventing deaths from Covid: “The net impact of mask wearing will vary according to the levels of other interventions, including vaccination rates. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that consistently higher mask wearing rates across all ages would reduce the cumulative infection and mortality burden in Victoria.” However, as critics have pointed out, the study is a computer simulation study, that was based upon the claim that cloth masks reduce transmission by 53 percent and respirators reduced it by 80 percent. But, the issue of the effectiveness of mask is controversial and there are major studies that see masks as totally ineffective for preventing Covid transmission, or that this is inconclusive. The principle here is garbage in, garbage out.

Will a new mask policy be based upon such “research”?

Australian has not got to the US level on this issue just yet, but given the cultural similarities, it will not be long. Example: a YouTuber named Kai Cenat sparked a riot when he said he would be giving away PlayStation 5 consoles in New York City’s Union Square. Thousands of youth turned up, and Mr YouTuber did not have thousands of consoles to give away. So, since we are here, why not riot, loot and smash everything up? And that is exactly what happened:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK3XwC7Z4M0

Dr David Barton “The Voice Roadshow Comes to Town,” Quadrant Special digital Edition, August 2023, has some interesting remarks about what is actually said in the Voice roadshows going on across the country. As one would predict, it is woke falling over itself:

“Langton led the charge with a potted history of Aboriginal activism since the 1960s, then moved to focus on more recent events like the Northern Territory Intervention, of which she was scathing (“harming our people”), Aboriginal deaths in custody (“institutionalised racism”), stolen generations (“attempted genocide”), child abuse (that’s “the churches”) and the usual grab-bag of victimhood complaints. Langton argued that the Voice is needed to “limit the ability of the Parliament to cause us harm”—just how precisely is that to occur? And, of course, what “harm”—the annual $36 billion spent on Aboriginal affairs? Langton also trotted out the old “terra nullius” furphy, and the audience drank it all in with rapturous applause. She also spent some time drilling into us that there is “no biological evidence whatsoever for ‘race’—it doesn’t exist”, which is highly disputed, plus the usual claims to 65,000-plus years of history, also hotly contested. Langton seemed blithely ignorant of the inherent illogicality of her own argument. If “race” does not exist, then why do we need a race-based “Voice”? She said indigenous “spirituality” and connection to the land make Aborigines special, but there’s no biological evidence of intergenerational genetic or DNA transfer of “love of land” to suggest that contemporary Aboriginal people have any greater feeling of attachment to the land than anybody else. Langton continued to bang the drum of “disadvantaged tribal Aboriginal people in Central Australia” as justification for the Voice. But these tribal people represent a minuscule fraction of the 3.4 per cent of Australians who identify as Aborigines, and much of their current situation is a direct result of their own choices. Tribal Aboriginal people have bad diets because that’s what they want to eat. White colonialists don’t make them eat unwisely. The panel made reference to the high prevalence of diabetes in Aboriginal communities, again implying it’s the whitefellas’ fault, without making any reference to tribal Aborigines’ lack of tolerance for sugar, which promotes the increased incidence of diabetes. There was more of the same about the “housing shortage”. Tribal Aborigines’ homes get trashed because so many families and individuals live in them communally because of “humbugging”. But no mention was made of that, yet Perkins and Langton would be familiar with the problem. We don’t need a “Voice’ to sort out those problems, which have been around for over five decades. We need to admit that much so-called “Aboriginal culture” is very damaging to Aboriginal people and that only by greater integration into our modern Western society will these problems be solved.”

A number of papers in the Quadrant Special Edition, August 2023, critique the idea of sacred sites, and especially the anthropology that Aboriginal tribes lived on the same land for 50,000 (it has reached 60,000 + now) years with a continuity of sacred knowledge being passed down for tens of thousands of years making this the “oldest living culture,” and therefore highly special. Hence, special treatment must be given in deference. Only a slight reflection in epistemology, the theory of the justification of knowledge claims, should give pause to this. How could this possibly be known, merely from the archaeological records which exist? The time period of 60,00 years is vast, and debates exist about what humans were doing at that time, as well as archaic human subspecies such as the Neanderthals.  Do we really know that in that time other human groups did not co-occupy this land mass?  

Peter Purcell, “The Ruse of Tradition,” shows that there has been evolution and changes even within contemporary times. As he says, what is known about the past conflicts with the romantic Leftist notions founding the Voice: “Highly romanticised and poorly informed views about traditional Aboriginal culture now prevail among the general public, including many Aboriginal Australians of mixed heritage. In most descriptions, Aboriginal culture is barely recognisable as anything resembling its traditional pre-contact forms, even allowing for normal cultural evolution. The realities of the pre-colonial Aboriginal past, with all its hardship and violence, the revenge killings and infanticide, the sexual abuse and sorcery, have been replaced with visions of a noble and idyllic society, free of the avarice and inequality deemed characteristic of contemporary capitalist Australian society. All ills are said to have been learned from the “invaders”, without whom Eden would not have been lost. These views have become the popular wisdom, are ubiquitous in the media, and are now taught as fact in schools. This pessimistic view of Australia’s founding AngloCeltic cultural heritage has been developing and deepening since the 1960s. Suffice to say here that this intellectual drift—demise might be a better term—involves a loss of faith in Western culture, religion and technology, and a turning back to nature, even a worshipping of it: what historian Geoffrey Blainey called the Great Seesaw. The idolising of nature and “native” cultures has deep roots in the Western psyche: unhappy urban intellectuals hate the “city” and bemoan the ruination of man’s inherent nobility by Western civilisation. Aboriginal people, especially those in more remote settlements, are seen to be closer to nature, with a culture that is socialistic in its sharing and caring. In this paradisial perspective, it is only a return to country and the reclaiming of culture, in the imagination if not in reality, that will restore a natural nobility to urban Aborigines and ensure a life free of burden or want. This, of course, is the age-old urban intellectual fantasy— flight from the despoiling city to the forests of his origins will restore man’s soul—but the fantasy is now pervasively spread through the broader community. Nowadays, of course, the flight is metaphorical, seeking lift from a constitutionally enshrined Voice, but with Treaty, Reconciliation and Reparation in the wings.”

This is the position of Salvatore Babones in “Democracy, Liberal Authoritarianism and the Voice,” Quadrant Special Digital Edition, August 2023. After a long argument about political theory and Trump, he says some very useful things for activists opposing the Voice as the Voice is supposed to, by definition, give a “voice” to indigenous people who at present do not have a “voice,” but  will not, being merely a road show for the elites:

https://quadrant.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Quadrant-202308-Aug-Online-PEindex-4-1.pdf