“Child Molester Gets to Stay for the Disability Payments” — Australian Style! By Tom North
In a story that sounds like it was written by a particularly deranged satirist, a migrant from Sierra Leone molested a child… but gets to remain in the country because deporting him would mean losing his precious disability benefits!
https://www.noticer.news/african-refugee-sex-offender-spared-deportation/
Australia reads this and thinks: mate, hold my VB.
Because if there's one thing our own immigration and welfare system excels at, it's turning common sense into a hate crime and taxpayer-funded compassion into a suicide pact.
Welcome to the Modern West: Where the Rights of the Predator Trump the Safety of the Child
According to the American Thinker report, the offender was convicted of molesting a minor. You'd think that would be game over — pack your bags, sunshine. But no. Bureaucratic genius has determined that his medical conditions make him too disabled to be sent home. So, he stays. On benefits. Near children? He was not required to complete a sex offender program as he was assessed as "low risk"! Because nothing says "child protection" quite like keeping a convicted sex offender in the country so he can keep claiming welfare.
This isn't an isolated Australian insanity. This is the transnational religion of the modern administrative state: once someone arrives (legally or otherwise), they become a sacred client of the system. Deportation is mean. Enforcement is racist. Public safety is negotiable. Centrelink payments are forever.
We've seen it here too in Melbourne. Diverse gangs terrorising Melbourne suburbs while authorities wring their hands about "systemic racism." Diverse asylum seekers with serious criminal records fighting deportation for years on "human rights" grounds. Temporary Protection Visas that somehow become permanent lifestyles. Offshore detainees released into the community who then reoffend.
And always — always — the quiet justification lurking in the background: they're on benefits, they've got conditions, they've built "community ties." Translation: we've already spent a fortune on them, so better to risk Australian kids than admit the policy was a catastrophic failure.
Imagine explaining this to your average Aussie battler paying taxes in Adelaide or Brisbane:
"Yes sir, the man who interfered with a child will remain here because his back hurts and he qualifies for the Disability Support Pension. Of, his IQ is too low. Would you like to pay a bit more tax to support his ongoing presence?"
The taxpayer nods slowly, reaches for another stubby, and mutters the only logical response: "Fair dinkum."
The Sacred Hierarchy
In the progressive moral order, the ranking is crystal clear:
1.The feelings and "dignity" of the migrant (even criminal ones)
2.International treaties and activist lawyers
3.The comfort of bureaucrats who don't want the paperwork of deportation
4.Actual Australian children and their safety (somewhere near the bottom, after "diversity metrics").
This is how you end up with stories that sound like they were generated by an AI trained exclusively on The Guardian and UNHCR press releases.
Enough!
The average Australian doesn't want to "punch down" on migrants. Most are happy to welcome people who come here to work hard, obey the law, and contribute. What they're sick of is a system that treats illegal entry, welfare dependency, and even serious criminality as minor administrative hiccups while treating concerns about child safety as "far-Right extremism."
If a migrant child molester can't be deported because of disability payments, rest assured similar logic is hard at work in Canberra. Somewhere right now, a departmental officer is probably filling out forms to ensure that public safety doesn't inconvenience the welfare stream.
This isn't compassion. This is institutional insanity wearing a high-vis "be kind" vest.
And Australians are increasingly of a single mind: if you molest a child, your disability benefits should be the least of your worries. Your plane ticket home should already be booked — one way.
