On the climate change issue, my position is that climate changes when it wants to. There have been ups and downs throughout geological time, assuming you accept standard science. If the world was created only 4,000 years ago, then it is a different matter. On this question, as a Christian I am just not sure. Anyway, rather than climate fluctuations being a dispassionate scientific question, global warming has become a religious faith of the progressives and globalists, who use it for their agenda. Here is an example, where climate change serves the multiracial agenda of eliminating Whites:
  https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/climate-change-could-affect-human-evolution-here-s-how-ncna907276

“The reason why climate change could reduce racial differences is that it will trigger massive migrations. In recent decades the world has become more urbanized, with people moving into large cities in coastal areas. But as polar ice melts and sea levels rise, large numbers of people will be forced to flee the coasts. And as droughts become more common and more severe, people living in more arid areas will have to move to places with more reliable sources of water. These migrations will erode the geographic barriers that once separated human populations. In fact, this process is already underway. As of 2017, 258 million people were living in a country other than the one they were born in — an increase of 49 percent since 2000, according to a report from the United Nations. A World Bank report released in March predicts that climate change will cause 140 million people to migrate by 2050, with those now living in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America especially likely to migrate.

To The Age              The Coalition will start picking up votes fast if they take the line of federal education minister Dan Tehan ("Uni free-speech rules 'worth considering'", 19/9). Maintaining full freedom of speech in universities is a vital principle for a sane society. Arguments that certain controversial speakers "should be denied a platform" are immoral rubbish masquerading as morality. Scott Morrison should confirm that, if re-elected, the Coalition will aim to ensure that security bills are paid by troublemakers and not innocent speakers.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

     The so-called transhuman movement looks forward to the perfectibility via uploading human consciousness into robot bodies, or so the high tech fantasy goes. Behind all of this is an agenda of eliminating the most undesirable aspect of the human condition for a cosmopolitan: race. But, what if robots turned out to have an emergent “racism” all of their own? That would throw a spanner into the globalist works:
  https://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/09/13/robots-can-become-racist-and-sexist-all-on-their-own-study-finds.html

“A look at a new study that reveals how AI robots can independently develop prejudices like racism and sexism. Robots can develop prejudices like "racism and sexism" all on their own, a shocking new study has found. Artificial intelligence experts performed thousands of simulations on robot brains, revealing how they split off into groups and treat "outsiders" differently. Computer scientists and psychologists from Cardiff University and the USA's MIT teamed up to test how robots identify each other. But they also tested how they copy and learn behaviors from each other, too. The study, published in Scientific Reports, showed that virtual simulated robots would shun others, forming their own groups. The experiment involved a "give and take" system, where robots could choose which of their peers to donate to. As the virtual game unfolders, individuals would learn new donation strategies by copying other robots – to benefit themselves. It found that robots would donate to each other within small groups, denying outsiders to improve their own takings.

     I have always wondered about the vegan argument against eating meat, that the creatures involved are conscious, have values, so do not eat meat. But, what if the vegan is wrong in her metaphysics and plants too have consciousness?
  https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2018/09/watch-the-awesome-way-in-which-plants-defend-themselves-against-threats/ 
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBGt5OeAQFk

“We tend to think of plants as helpless, passive green blobs, but a fascinating new study, in which scientists used fluorescent light to visualise alarm signals within plants, shows how our photosynthesising friends are able to mobilise their defences. New research published today in Science is providing an unprecedented view of the signalling action that happens within plants when they’re under attack. A second or two after a plant receives an injury, such as a chomp from a caterpillar, a warning signal radiates from the location of the wound, spreading out through the entire plant in a process that takes fewer than 120 seconds. The plant, now aware that it’s under attack — or at least, as “aware” as a plant can be — can respond to the threat by releasing chemical countermeasures. Scientists have known about this system-wide signalling system for quite some time, but the new study, conducted by researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and several other institutions, is the first to show this remarkable defence mechanism in action. What’s more, the study offers new insights into the biological processes behind this nervous system-like signalling, which is still poorly understood.”

     Although Chris Knight and Charles Taylor (in Florida) cover the US political scene and its significance for the West, I feel some comment is required on the present controversy over the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court. The latest revelation is that, as alleged by Christine Blasey Ford, as a teenager, young Brett tried to force Ford to have sex, which is now rape. An alleged witness says that this event did not occur. The event allegedly took place four decades ago, and Ford does not remember much about it, apart form the man who may overturn the sacred judgment for abortion on demand, Roe v Wade, did it. But, Ford now wants a full FBI investigation, before testifying. Now that the Democrats face a threat to their sacred cow of abortion on demand, as well as a judge who will interpret the Constitution the way the Founding Fathers intended (originalism), it is necessary to destroy this nomination. There is no plausibility to a rape/sexual assault claim that took place so long ago, and then magically surfaces at the right political moment, by someone who is opposed to Trump.
  https://gellerreport.com/2018/09/debra-katz-george-soros-kavanaugh.html/

     The best thing here is to put ford’s claim to the test and sue her for defamation, if she fails the test. She is making the most serious of criminal accusations, against a white male, who seem to be the only one’s today who may be judged for rape. Not only that, but Ford is claiming that she thought that she was going to be raped and  murdered too. At least she did not include Don Trump in her little narrative! Sorry, no one is more sympathetic to women’s plight than me, and I have covered the raping of Europe issue at this site in great detail. If Kavanaugh was a rapist, Ford had a duty to the public to expose him decades ago. It staggers belief to suppose that this convenient piece of dirt surfaces now. And, it seems that the FBI agrees, saying that “It’s totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened.” My argument in a nutshell:
  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/fbi-will-not-launch-criminal-investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations.html

     This one really upset the elites, who hate the thought that white folk have a right to anything except death: Italians need to have more children, not bring in African migrants, the ever-smiling Matteo Salvini has said:
  https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/15/salvini-help-italians-have-more-children-not-bring-africans-replace/

“Italy’s Matteo Salvini infuriated the EU’s most senior foreign minister by declaring that Italy needs more children, not more Africans “to replace the children we’re not having”. Speaking at a conference on the European migrant crisis in Vienna, the dynamic League (Lega) leader, who became Italy’s deputy prime minister and minister of the interior after anti-establishment populists triumphed at the polls in the recent elections, said he disagreed with EU politicians “[who] say that we need immigration because the population of Europe is getting older”. “I have a completely different viewpoint,” he said. “I believe that I’m in government in order to see that our young people have the number of children that they used to a few years ago, and not to transplant the best of Africa’s youth to Europe.” Salvini’s remarks flustered nearby Jean Asselborn, who muttered “blah, blah, blah” while the  Italian was speaking. The 69-year-old Luxembourger, who is the EU’s longest-serving foreign minister — having been in post since 2004 — has previously complained that anti-mass migration parties which want to “protect Christianity” and refuse to “open the door” to Arabic-speaking Muslim migrants will “destroy Europe” with their strong border policies.”

     Things get worse in the rainbow anarcho-tyranny state of South Africa, by the day. The last shock, horror story is that a South African spokesman of the Black First, Land First movement has said that white existence itself is a crime:
  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-19/south-african-blf-party-white-existence-crimewe-say-land-or-death

“The BLF spokesperson has posted views reflecting his party’s belief that all white people in South Africa are criminals by virtue of their existence. Black First, Land First spokesperson Lindsay Maasdorp has told the author of this article and others about the controversial party that my “existence is a crime.” He also repeated his party’s slogan, “land or death.”

     No, I am not alluding to the gender bender pop icon, but to another icon, George Soros, the man with the money, who is certainly very generous for global socialist causes:
  https://gellerreport.com/2018/09/soros-paid-kavanaugh-protesters.html/

•    “Activists backed by left-wing billionaires like George Soros are giving cash to protesters arrested for disrupting Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings.
•    The cash is for the protesters to resolve their charges after an arrest.
•    Activists also explained how individuals could be arrested and released in order to disrupt the hearing multiple times a day.

     While Western politicians fall over themselves in political correctness, especially on the guns issue, Vlad Putin simply goes to look at the latest Russian super-sniper rifle, which may soon be used in World War III, and let’s off a few rounds with the boys:
  https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/russian-president-vladimir-putin-tests-new-kalashnikov-super-rifle_09192018 
  https://www.rt.com/news/438858-putin-sniper-rifle-kalashnikov/

“Footage captures Russia’s president, who got his hands on a modern sniper rifle from renowned weapons-maker Kalashnikov, picking off targets at a distance of 600 meters. Russian President Vladimir Putin visited an exhibition of the Kalashnikov Concern in Patriot Park outside Moscow on Wednesday. And he didn’t just inspect the military hardware – he got up-close and personal with one of them – a modern SVCh sniper rifle.”

     In Sweden, a “Christian” church is  removing crosses to make Muslims feel welcome! Christianity for them, is some sort of socialist religion of welfarism, which just goes with Sweden, as Sweden goes down:
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkfRkR1Pqag

     Britain though, is not defeated in the deracination stakes, with the move being on to eliminate references to God as male, and to emphasise the feminine nature of God:
  https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/17/clergy-tells-church-to-stop-referring-god-emphasise-feminine-nature-god/

     The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan for a non-white pan-Europe, has recently been discussed at a number of sites:
  http://golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-genocide-of.html
  http://xn--identit-fwa.com/blog/2012/12/11/il-piano-kalergi-il-genocidio-dei-popoli-europei/

     The article quoted here, below, has been reproduced in translation at many internet sites, but originally appeared in Italian, at Identità.com (identity.com). It shows that the present plan of the ethno-racial genocide of Europe by displacement level mass migration has a long history.

     With sexual abuse allegations just about everywhere, one would have thought that the Pope would be keeping quiet, waiting, drinking good wine, eating rich high cholesterol food, and listening to … well maybe some hot Latin dance tracks. Like Despacito now with 5.5 BILLION YouTube views. I do not want to risk a heart attack even watching it. But, I digress. The Pope is so cheesed off at the Vatican whistle-blower that he has called him, in his own way, “satanic”:
  https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/11/pope-francis-compares-vatican-whistleblower-satan/

“Satan, the “Great Accuser,” has been unleashed against the bishops of the Church, Pope Francis said Tuesday, in a thinly veiled reference to the former Vatican nuncio to the United States. The former nuncio, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, recently accused a number of prelates of dereliction of duty in dealing with clerical sex abuse and claimed that the pope had rehabilitated serial abuser Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, elevating him to a position of influence despite knowledge of his misdeeds. In an 11-page testimony published on August 25, Viganò alleged that he had personally informed Pope Francis in 2013 of the serial homosexual abuse perpetrated by Cardinal McCarrick, along with sanctions imposed on his ministry by Pope Benedict XVI, and yet the pope lifted those sanctions and involved McCarrick in the naming of future bishops.

     The great cartoon controversy has gone international.  A cartoon was published by The Herald Sun of tennis great Serena Williams, who had something of a meltdown following a dispute with a chair umpire in the US Open final. Personally, I am on Serena’s side on this, but I respect that most readers would disagree. The catoon was said to have “racist” overtones by depicting Serena in an unflattering light. The newspaper has stood by its cartoonist and on a recent front page partially republished the cartoon, under the headline, “Welcome to the PC World.”
  https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/herald-sun-backs-mark-knights-cartoon-on-serena-williams/news-story/30c877e3937a510d64609d89ac521d9f

     The issue here relates to the cartoon, which like all cartoons uses caricatures. Cartoonists are savage by nature, and I don’t think race comes into it. Just look at how Julia Gillard was treated. You would think that all she was a backside. In general, women get a poor treatment by male cartoonists, who satirise their sexuality, but then again, everybody is fair game. It is just the price of free speech, and sometimes those on the receiving end, who are in the public eye simply have to suck it up. Let it go Serena, get back into training for next season.

     It is hard to keep track of all the demons running wild in America, with disintegration and decay now taking on cosmic, if not metaphysical dimensions. Physically, much of the place is likely to be destroyed by Hurricane Florence. According to Charles Taylor, our US correspondent, whom I spoke to today from his bug out nuclear bunker, people have been told to evacuate, and if they stay they are on their own because there will be no support coming. Charles, being a harden Christian survivalist, has hunkered down with his family and a sack of Bibles, and AR 15 rifles. God be with them. As dangerous as nature is, the unnatural progressives, or as I call them, degenerates, as far more dangerous, having intergenerational destructive power, with no easy mop up. Thus, at the link below Mike Adams attempts to sum it all up, every crazy thing the Left are up to, the Deep State moving to impeach Trump, and rumours of a Trump assassination, presumably as a plan B:
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-12-no-one-is-ready-for-whats-about-to-happen.html

     I do not think that this is paranoid, since recent revelations have shown Google’s clear prejudice against Trump at least at the time of the election:
  https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/leaked-video-google-leaderships-dismayed-reaction-to-trump-election/
  https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/12/trump-campaign-manager-calls-for-investigation-into-google-after-breitbart-video-threat-to-republic/

     One no longer has to be a man to be attacked by radical Leftoid Trotskyists and other creatures of communism, as shown by the recent disruptions of leading sex therapist, and critic of feminism, Bettina Arndt, daughter of leading economist professor H. W. Arndt. Here we are no dealing with some internet personality here, but a solid intellectual. But, the crazed  Left made no attempt to debate her, but immediately took the low road of threat, to shut her down, or at least try:
  http://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/news/la-trobe-activists-try-to-disrupt-talk-on-fake-rape-crisis/  
  http://honisoit.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/video-1536657457.mp4
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANxU7s78MTY&feature=youtu.be 
  https://www.youtube.com/user/bettinaarndtaus

“Bettina Arndt has confronted protesting socialist students as she starts her controversial university tour about campus rape. The sex therapist and columnist gave her first of a series of lectures on why she believes there is not a “rape crisis” at Australian universities at La Trobe University today, but not everyone wanted to listen. All through Ms Arndt’s lecture, protesters aligned with the Victorian Socialists banged on the doors of the Eastern Lecture Theatre and chanted “Bettina Arndt, go to hell. Go take Milo (Yianipoulos) there as well.” A protester from the Victorian Socialists speaks his mind La Trobe University before Bettina Arndt’s talk. But before she spoke, the sex therapist approached the students at their uni square stand and tried to talk to them. The socialist students just kept chanting. “Why don’t they come and listen to me speak? And engage in a conversation around this issue,” she said, “What are they afraid of?”

To The Australian         The call by Henry Ergas for national unity ("Sweden showing the world how vulnerable we are", 14/9) raises the question of what kind of "cultural homogeneity" do we want here in the future? What kind of "shared values" might keep us able to "argue passionately yet live harmoniously"? Neither exclusivist Christianity nor aggressive left-wing idealism will do the job, for the opponents of each are too numerous and will remain so. What is needed then is an inclusivist approach to religion, one that embraces all the great sacred traditions and does not persecute unbelievers. Properly formulated, such a foundation can provide a viable basis on which a moral code can be supported that the great majority find acceptable. Essential to this approach would be a return to much greater freedom of speech, especially on matters concerning race and ethnicity. Underlying this ethos for a "new Australia" would be a shared conviction (in most Australians) that truth is a reality and that one's life should be lived according to it. Truth depends on the mysterious divine Being and is the enemy of all fanaticism's and modes of mean selfishness. 
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

To The Age         It is not as hard as David Crowe thinks ("Morrison's leap of faith", 14/9) to settle the debate over religious freedom, but it will require subtle analyses and proposals from the government. For example, it is obvious that children in public primary schools should be able to put on Easter and Christmas plays, for this can be done in a way that does not unfairly treat children from non-religious families. Alternative drama opportunities in parallel time is surely the answer for them. At the present time many Christians appear justified in feeling that their religion is under unjust threat from aggressive secularists. Protections can be found that do not in turn unjustly discriminate against non-religious folk. Christian schools and charities are surely happy to employ those not of the faith, provided that such employees do not actively seek to weaken them from within, being content to campaign outside the workplace. Freedom of speech as a vital principle must be recognized as allowing "discrimination against others" in expressions of opinion; but this gives a benefit to everyone and protects us all from tyranny.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

     I had not heard about parabiosis, the transfusion of a younger person’s blood into an older to give them more zing, but apparently it works and is being done, regularly:
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-13-wealthy-elitists-literally-living-off-blood-transfusions-from-children-modern-vampires.html

“As reported by Fellowship of the Minds, members of the “healthy but wealthy” elite are paying upwards of $8,000 for 1.5 liters (34 fluid ounces) of young blood in a desperate bid to turn back the hands of time. According to the director of social work at Idaho State University, D.J. Williams -- who says he's studied people who identify as vampires for about a 10 years (hmm...a Vampireologist?)--such vampires exist in droves all around the globe.(1) He explains that they're not the cape-wearing, large-fanged folks likely conjured up thanks to horror flicks and Hollywood portrayals, but instead, real people who seek out more energy by sucking on the blood of consenting donors. In fact, he even distinguishes between the movie images and real vampires using differentiating terms such as "lifestyle" vampires and "authentic" ones. "The real vampire community seems to be a conscientious and ethical one," he says, adding that "they are successful, ordinary people." In other words, fatigued humans who suck the blood from others, creating communities that literally feed off one another's powerful needs while fearing backlash if found their secrets were discovered likely involves everyone from lawyers to presidential candidates. Who knew?”

     Who would not want to be an illegal migrant, going to Canada, which is having a giant fire sale … no, fantastic give away of the country …  just to be the ultimate in cuckiness:
  https://gellerreport.com/2018/09/trudeau-migrants-canadians.html/ 
  https://www.therebel.media/treat-canadian-soldiers-better

“The "non-partisan" ministerial bureaucrats working for Justin Trudeau's Liberals are actively hiding from Canadians the details surrounding the cost of the "refugee" settlement program. In a memo obtained by The Rebel through the Freedom of Information Act, bureaucrats discussed how to handle a media inquiry about the yearly cash support that Canada provides Trudeau's Syrians. “ Thanks Nancy, we have a table approved in past responses with breakdowns. Can we try to dig that up and include it here? I think the reporter is looking for numbers. We know that 50k is the new start-up cost but we haven't used that yet. If we do can we get MINO approval? Earlier this week we opted to go with the individual cost response for the Canadian Federation of Taxpayers , but in this instance the reporter is talking about families so it may be okay to use”

To The Australian        Reading Janet Albrechtsen's latest sensible defence of free speech ("Resisting tyranny in the age of outrage", 15-16/9), one recalls the famous biblical question: "Who will go out to fight if the trumpets give an uncertain sound?" Perhaps the reason that there are so many "pusillanimous people" among those who should guard the openness of our social forums is that there is profound confusion over what our nation should stand for. Are we a Christian nation? Well, there are a large number of vocal and aggressive atheists, probably as many or more apathetic agnostics and then far too many Christians who adhere to a fatally flawed "orthodox" theology that most of our best minds cannot possibly advocate. Are we really liberal and democratic? Well, there are still some sensitive topics that are not allowed to be debated in our main public forums, and the very structure of our party political system seriously inhibits authentic representation of the electorate on several great issues, notably immigration. Yes, "we need to open young minds to the wonder of new and challenging ideas", but we need beyond that a much more profound and widespread love of truth - and willingness to publicly defend it.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic