Former US cop Derek Chauvin has been found guilty of all three charges, including intentionally ad negligently killing Floyd, which many legal authorities have viewed as inconsistent. Second degree murder requires killing while performing another felony. Anyway, that is our legal system where if you are white you can still be guilty of mutually exclusive accounts. It shows that the jury just convicted due to fear of riots and media bias. Congress woman Maxine Waters inflamed the situation by saying that “as far as I am concerned, it’s first degree murder.” She wanted more confrontation.
It is possible that there could be an appeal based upon Waters remarks, as the trial judge has recognised. But let’s be realistic, this is a land where elections get stolen in broad daylight, so it does not matter, Chauvin was a sacrifice to the new regime. Even the knee on the neck was shown by a police training video to be part of departmental policy, if it occurred at all (perspective bias), and the police then under cross examination denied this. It is inconceivable to suppose that the jury could be impartial given that the political and media class had decided that Chauvin was guilty, at the time of Floyd’s death. What point was there even having a trial at all? And the city had paid the Floyd family compensation before the trial, indicating that it was in the bag. Our courts really are kangaroo courts, as argued here: