This is a taste of what is in store as former White countries become non-white. The progressive Left are just a warm-up of what is coming our way, as we will soon see in South Africa:
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-11-01-radical-left-now-calling-for-banning-of-voting-rights-for-all-straight-white-men.html
  https://pjmedia.com/election/former-tv-ceo-says-u-s-should-ban-straight-white-males-from-voting/

“Steven Clifford, author and former CEO of the King Broadcasting Company and National Mobile Television, told PJM that the federal government should “prohibit straight white males from voting” in U.S. elections as a way to “save” democracy. “I think it’s the only hope for democracy in America and I will be leading a great movement to prohibit straight white males, who I believe supported Donald Trump by about 85 percent, from exercising the franchise and I think that will save our democracy,” Clifford said during an interview after speaking at the forum “Destroying the Myths of Market Fundamentalism,” which was organized by the Center for Study of Responsive Law – a group former independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader founded in 1968. Clifford, author of the book CEO Pay Machine: How it Trashes America and How to Stop it, urged Democrats to explain their policy proposals to voters rather than focus on the reasons they oppose President Trump.”

     Right! It is Tasmania’s turn to do something politically correct and spectacular, such as removing gender from birth certificates, which I suppose, eliminates gender from the real world, which is a gender construction, anyway.
  https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/worldtoday/tasmania-to-vote-on-removing-gender-from-birth-certificates/10423540

     Yes, Labor and the Greens are pushing this. Isn’t interesting that the Greens don’t say much about the alleged environmental catastrophe that is supposed to be hitting us? I am not saying that such a thing exists, for surely God would not allow anything like that, but the Greens are supposed to believe it. Yet they spend their time on social justice warrior issues, which in their context, would not be significant. And Labor … isn’t that supposed to be  about Australian working people, not mass immigration to swamp their jobs? Whatever happened to that party? That just shows that the Greens are watermelons; green on the outside, but all red and full of water on the inside. As for Labor, I am not sure what vegetable or plant best depicts them. Maybe poison ivy.

     I have been pursuing the issue of the murder of babies who are born during abortions, and this is not a rare as we might first think. I noticed this article which says that there is a film dealing with all of these issues, but predictably enough, it has been shut down. The film is Gosnell: the Trial of America’s Biggest Serial Killer, and so far over 250 cinemas across the land of the free have suppressed it, even though the film is wildly successful:
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-10-25-movie-theaters-blacklist-gosnell-documentary-about-mass-murder-of-human-babies.html

“According to reports, more than 250 movie theaters (and counting) have pulled “Gosnell” from their screens, even though the film has grossed more than $2.5 million since it opened on October 12. Why is “Gosnell” being targeted for destruction, you’re probably asking? If you’re not already familiar with its content, the film tells the disturbing story of Kermit Gosnell, the infamous Philadelphia abortionist who was sentenced to life in prison for first degree murder after he ended the lives of three newly-born babies, as well as the life of one of his patients. Dubbed the “house of horror,” Gosnell’s abortion clinic looked much like any other – a “women’s health” center providing “female services” to the local community. But in the “Gosnell” film, this veneer of deception was peeled off, which is why it received little attention from the mainstream media, and even had its advertising banned both from Facebook and NPR. “This movie really exposes something that the Left does not want to report about,” Nick Searcy, the director of “Gosnell,” told PJ Media. “They’re basically trying to ignore this movie. They’re trying to say that it doesn’t exist because they don’t want to have a discussion about abortion.”

     What do you get from making all sorts of unsubstantiated allegations about rape, ages after the event, in a highly charged political context?
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/29/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-rakes-in-1-million-several-book-offers/

“Christine Blasey Ford, the California psychology professor who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct 36 years ago, received a $1 million windfall and is receiving several requests for book deals after her testimony. RealClearInvestigations reported Monday that Ford’s 15 minutes of fame before the Senate Judiciary Committee in September has turned her into a millionaire, raking in an estimated $1 million from crowdfunding campaigns supporting her and several book deals since her testimony. Despite Ford’s windfall, several Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, including Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), said Ford had “nothing to gain” by coming forward with her accusations to the committee.”

     We are fast moving towards the society where being a cis/heterosexual, will become a crime, not yet, but we are on the track to this:
  http://caldronpool.com/christian-filmmakers-told-they-must-make-films-advocating-lgbtq-lifestyles-or-risk-huge-fines-and-even-jail-time/?fbclid=IwAR1SM0EOgYVLNKDhw1ZZriftrmi51EaTuSFB8-PKxBR9w38eCnFoYErrrO0

“Telescope Media Group is a Christian film company based in Minnesota. It’s a small family business, run by husband and wife team, Carl and Angel Larsen. Their company tagline reads, “We want to magnify Christ like a telescope.” Last year, a Minnesota court ruled that the couple were in violation of the state’s Human Rights Act which requires them to abandon their faith by using their services to create films celebrating homosexuality and same-sex marriage. According to the Alliance Defending Freedom, “State officials have categorically, publicly, and repeatedly threatened to prosecute expressive business owners who decline to create speech promoting same-sex marriage. Steep penalties exist for violating the law, including payment of a civil penalty to the state; triple compensatory damages; punitive damages of up to $25,000; a criminal penalty of up to $1,000; and even up to 90 days in jail.” Jeremy Tedesco, ADF Senior Counsel, warned, “The same government that can force them to violate their faith and conscience can force anyone of us to do the same.”

     Trump is probably going to let the mass illegals from South America invade the US, as the Deep State wants cheap displacing labour, but Trump has made some squeaks about the transgender issue, which has thrown Hollywood social justice warriors such as Charlize Theron into a fit, you know, “human rights.”
  https://www.breitbart.com/news/fury-over-reported-federal-plan-targeting-transgender-people/
  https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2018/10/22/charlize-theron-trump-admin-violating-transgender-peoples-basic-human-rights/

“The Department of Health and Human Services acknowledged months ago that it was working to rewrite a federal rule that bars discrimination in health care based on “gender identity.” It cited a Texas-based federal judge’s opinion that the original rule went too far in concluding that discrimination based on gender identity is a form of sex discrimination, which is forbidden by civil rights laws. On Sunday, The New York Times reported that the agency was circulating a memo proposing that gender be defined as an immutable biological condition determined by a person’s sex organs at birth. The election-year proposal would define sex as either male or female, and any dispute about one’s sex would have to be clarified through genetic testing, according to the Times’ account of the memo.”

     The Left are working of the social acceptance of paedophilia, but are further advanced with the promotion of three way marriages and polygamy, which fits in well with multiculturalism.  This article refers to Britain, but in our globalist world, it will happen in Australia just as quickly: 
  https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/natalie-bennett-says-green-party-is-open-to-discussing-three-way-marriages-and-polygamy-10220268.html?fbclid=IwAR3rjiwTxBZHL2pja3RBGikWDKYNsJz4cpM7h6PfCyw2H71I7WlMK1Yjqbk

“Natalie Bennett has said her party is “open to consultation” on the possibility of legalising polygamy and civil partnerships involving three or more people. The Green Party leader was responding to a question from a man living with his two boyfriends in a polyamorous relationship in London on Friday. Dr Redfern Jon Barrett, taking part in an event organised by Pink News, said people like himself in three-way relationships faced a “considerable amount of legal discrimination”. Ms Bennett replied that although the Green Party “at present” has no specific policy on legal partnerships involving more than two people, members could develop one and vote for it to be introduced.’

     No doubt, this parody of political correctness mean to be a pure as the snow driven through the mud, but his claim that women who have large families are uneducated, sounded elitist and racist, since it hit women of colour:
  https://www.lifenews.com/2018/10/19/french-president-emmanuel-macron-says-women-who-have-large-families-are-uneducated/?fbclid=IwAR3vSOVNmzNY-0Zl8LFrauvaBIR7W-MrhThrOTYCNH5U0z9EqTMZQBZBmiU

“Abortion supporters and population control proponents have frequently targeted those with large families — claiming that they are selfish or hurting the environment or that mothers of such families are somehow demeaning themselves compared to other women because they desired more children. French President Emmanuel Macron is the latest to insult people with large families, as he said women who mother such families are uneducated. His comments came in association with remarks trashing women in Africa for not exercising population control. The French president, who has come under fire over his views on Africa in the past, added that the future for the continent’s young people must be to stay in a revitalised Africa, and insisted it was “pure bull—-” to suggest he was telling African people from New York what to do with their lives. “One of the critical issues of African demography is that this is not chosen fertility,” said Macron, speaking at the Gates Foundation’s “goalkeepers” event on the margins of the UN general assembly in New York. “I always say: ‘Present me the woman who decided, being perfectly educated, to have seven, eight or nine children.”

     I am proud to have never gone to university, even to dart into a city university to relieve myself, for I am a living example of the “toxic masculinity” which the roaming feminists and low testosterone, deracinated, cucked males there, would despise. Why, they may even be foolish enough to try and assault me with their tiny soft hands, that never did a hard day’s work manual labour, or fought for survival, and with puny bones as soft as sardine bones. Anyway, Brown University in the crazy US is offering courses on how not to be me:
  https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/23/brown-university-provides-programs-for-unlearning-toxic-masculinity/

“Brown University is providing male students programs for “unlearning toxic masculinity,” claiming that doing so will lead to males having longer life-spans and committing less sexual assault. The university advertises these programs as part of the BWell Health Promotion, as a health service initiative on their website. The Ivy League university claims that “unlearning toxic masculinity” will be beneficial not only for men, but for society as a whole. Brown claims that society’s definition of masculinity may be “toxic to men’s health,” causing them to “die at younger ages,” adding that the way in which men have been socialized also “plays into the type of violence that exists in college communities.”

     I have written before about my concern with botched abortions leading to a live baby, who is then left, conveniently, to die. Somewhat related to this issue; there is a move to consider foetal manslaughter laws, at least in New South Wales. Some background to the law here is given at this very good website:
  https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/the-foetal-manslaughter-debate-should-unborn-babies-be-separately-protected/

“The case of R v Iby [2005] NSWCCA 178 reiterates the earlier decision in R v F (1996) 40 NSWLR 245 which found that a homicide can only be committed against a being that is “fully born in a living state.” However, it should be noted that Chief Justice Spigelman remarked that the ‘born alive rule’ is based upon “anachronistic… [and] indeed antiquated, factors” in so far as it “adopts an artificial and non-scientific concept of when life begins.”

     Imagine … there’s no gender studies departments … it is easy if you try …because Hungary has done it:
  https://www.sbs.com.au/news/hungary-gender-studies-ban-prompts-university-anger

“A prestigious Hungarian university on Tuesday blasted a government decree that prohibits gender studies courses as a "major infringement" on academic freedom. The decree, signed by Prime Minister Viktor Orban and in force since Saturday, dropped the subject from a list of masters degree programmes entitled to official accreditation and financial support. Institutions are also now barred from launching new courses in the discipline, although students who have already begun courses may complete their studies, according to the decree. "This is a major infringement on academic freedom and university autonomy," said the Budapest-based Central European University (CEU) in a statement. "Eliminating this programme will be a significant loss to the Hungarian scholarly community and for democratically-minded public policy," said the CEU, one of only two universities in Hungary that offered gender studies degrees.

     Universities, at least in the US, and probably here in Ozzy, are running courses about queering the Bible, showing that the Bible is, I suppose, a gay document:
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/18/college-offers-credit-course-queering-bible/

“We will examine biblical passages that are central to prohibitions on homosexuality and the larger discourses of heteronormativity (constructed around gender, sexuality, class, national identity, state formations, kinship, children, etc.) in which homophobic readings of the Bible emerge. We will also look at the ways in which these discourses and the identities they shore up can be “queered,” as well as at biblical texts that can be read as queer friendly. This process of queering will allow and require us to approach the biblical text in new ways. Pomona student Daniel Silverman told Campus Reform the course meets the high demand at the school for classes that contain topics representative of left-wing ideology.

     The big debate in transgender vs cis women sport was over a cycling race:
  https://www.foxnews.com/sports/not-fair-world-cycling-bronze-medalist-cries-foul-after-transgender-woman-wins-gold 
  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/female-cyclist-who-lost-to-trans-woman-blasts-definitely-unfair-competition
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-10-18-finally-female-cyclist-cries-foul-over-biological-man-winning-womens-cycling-championship-by-claiming-to-be-a-transgender-woman.html
  https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/16/cyclist-transgender-win-unfair/

“The bronze medalist in last weekend’s female cycling championship isn’t pleased she lost to a biological male who identifies as a woman, Jennifer Wagner revealed this week. Wagner placed third in the women’s sprint 35-39 bracket of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) Masters Track Cycling World Championships Saturday. She lost to silver medalist Carolien van Herrikhuyzen and champion Rachel McKinnon, a Canadian-born philosophy professor who “identifies” as female despite being biologically male. McKinnon boasted that he was the “First transgender woman world champion...ever” and some have taken his win as a milestone for “equality” in professional athletics. But while van Herrikhuyzen embraced it as an “an honest race under UCI rules,” Wagner took to social media Monday to argue the race was “definitely NOT fair,” and that the current rules – brought about by a “human rights” settlement last year – were wrong.”

     Here was I as a high school maths teacher thinking that at least maths is free from the political correctness nonsense, but then I was sent a link to this article, and will have to think again. As one economist describes this:

“Math professor Ted Hill wrote an evolutionary theory paper on why male variability would be greater than female. It was accepted at one journal, but beore publication, pressure from Women in Mathematics led to the NSF asking that its name be removed as a grant source, then a co-author asking to be removed, then the journal accepting. A second journal heard about it, requested submission, accepted, but then removed the paper from its online site and put another paper of the same length there, after getting heat.”

     Feminists freely profess their hatred of men, which borders on the criminal, if not, pathological.
  https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/15/retired-feminist-professsor-in-washpo-i-wish-all-men-were-dead/ 
  https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/06/11/washington-post/

“A retired history professor from Grinnell College and feminist announced that she wishes that “all men were dead” in a column for the Washington Post over the weekend. Retired history professor Victoria Bissell Brown published a bizarre column in the Washington Post on Friday in which she detailed an outburst she had at her husband that included her wishing for the death of all men. I yelled at my husband last night. Not pick-up-your-socks yell. Not how-could-you-ignore-that-red-light yell. This was real yelling. This was 30 minutes of from-the-gut yelling. Triggered by a small, thoughtless, dismissive, annoyed, patronizing comment. Really small. A micro-wave that triggered a hurricane. I blew. Hard and fast. And it terrified me. I’m still terrified by what I felt and what I said. I am almost 70 years old. I am a grandmother. Yet in that roiling moment, screaming at my husband as if he represented every clueless male on the planet (and I every angry woman of 2018), I announced that I hate all men and wish all men were dead. If one of my grandchildren yelled something that ridiculous, I’d have to stifle a laugh. The column, which is entitled “Thanks for not raping us, all you ‘good men.’ But it’s not enough,” reads like a passive-aggressive rant from the type of unhinged ideologue that makes most rational people think twice before self-identifying with the “feminist” label.”

     Here is ethnomasochism in action, as only cucked Canada can do.
  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/justin-trudeau-refuses-to-condemn-attack-on-pro-life-woman-roundhouse-kicke?utm_content=buffer9632c&utm_medium=WCDM%2BBuffer&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=WCDM

“Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau refused to directly condemn a violent attack on a young pro-life woman by a pro-abortion advocate that happened in broad daylight during a pro-life event in Toronto on Sunday. A video of the attack has gone viral on social media. Despite that video, self-avowed feminist Trudeau did not directly condemn the violence against the pro-lifer when contacted by LifeSiteNews Thursday morning. Instead, a media request to the prime minister was handed off to the minister of public safety. That office then issued a generic statement: "We condemn all forms of violence."

To The Australian        Matthew Lesh has provided a fine defence of the crucial importance to our justice system of the presumption of innocence ("Sexual assault too serious a crime for a campus verdict", 19/10). The universities of Sydney and Tasmania need to pull back from their proposals for home patch arbitration of rape assault charges on the basis of a balance of probabilities. Behind these proposals, as behind so many wild and woolly campaigns by radicals, lies a prejudiced and intolerant mindset that has intensified in recent decades. Where did this obtuse stubbornness come from? The answer is probably twofold: the loss of strength of the high quality intellectual traditions of Christianity (as opposed to relatively mindless forms of populist Protestantism) and the appalling rapidity of so much of modern life, which does not provide time for deep consideration of the implications of change of policy.  
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic

     You have to hand it to the libtards for barefaced arrogance. We have been put through the debacle of the smearing of Justice Kavanaugh by numerous unsubstantiated rape claims, yet there is Bill Clinton, accused of rape by numerous credible victims, and what has happened? Well, Hillary Clinton has defended him, at least regarding the Lewinsky affair:
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/14/hillary-clinton-bill-not-abuse-power-lewinsky-affair/ 
  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton-says-husbands-affair-was-not-an-abuse-of-power
  https://nypost.com/2018/10/14/hillary-bill-didnt-abuse-his-power-because-lewinsky-was-an-adult/

“Former 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said in a Sunday interview that her husband, former President Bill Clinton, did not abuse his power when he had an affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
The former first lady told CBS Sunday Morning that her husband also made the right decision to not to resign from the presidency in the wake of the scandal that led to her husband’s impeachment for lying about the affair with the then-22-year-old intern. When asked if her husband should have resigned from the presidency, Clinton said, “Absolutely not.”

     There has been much made by various critics about the results of the DNA test that libtard and Trump critic Elizabeth Warren has had. It seems that most of the White American population have more American Indian blood than her, showing that President Trump was right in his criticisms:
  https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-10-15-dna-tests-prove-elizabeth-warren-has-less-native-american-ancestry-than-the-average-white-american.html#
  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-15/elizabeth-warren-scalps-herself-dna-gambit-backfires
  https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-15/elizabeth-warren-releases-dna-results-proving-she-part-native-american

“Democrat race hoaxer Elizabeth Warren wormed her way through Harvard by falsely claiming to be Native American. In 1997, the Fordham Law Review made her the poster child of successful “women of color” even though she’s white. Warren is widely expected to make a run for the presidency in 2020, so the entire fake news media is now trying desperately to clean up her history by finding some evidence that she might have Native American ancestry. Today, Elizabeth Warren released a so-called “DNA study” that had absolutely no independent chain of custody of her DNA sample, meaning the entire thing could have been easily faked by using someone else’s saliva or tissue sample. Even then, the DNA test revealed that she could be as little as 1/1024th Native America, or about .0976% “Indian.” This number comes from the Associated Press, which had to issue a correction because they got the math wrong in their first version of their report, which desperately tried to claim the DNA test proves Warren correct about her claims of being “Native American.”

To The Australian        Matthew Lesh has provided a fine defence of the crucial importance to our justice system of the presumption of innocence ("Sexual assault too serious a crime for a campus verdict", 19/10). The universities of Sydney and Tasmania need to pull back from their proposals for home patch arbitration of rape assault charges on the basis of a balance of probabilities. Behind these proposals, as behind so many wild and woolly campaigns by radicals, lies a prejudiced and intolerant mindset that has intensified in recent decades. Where did this obtuse stubbornness come from? The answer is probably twofold: the loss of strength of the high quality intellectual traditions of Christianity (as opposed to relatively mindless forms of populist Protestantism) and the appalling rapidity of so much of modern life, which does not provide time for deep consideration of the implications of change of policy.
  Nigel Jackson, Belgrave, Vic