How could there be sex slavery in California, the once land of the Beach Boys, golden beaches and sun on blonde hair, surfing and drinking beer. Who could be doing this? This shocking video tells us that all is not well in a land that makes, by comparison, Victoria, sane:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3It0uNZ0b-M
Conservatives were at first overjoyed; divorce rates had fallen. But, then they read the fine print; it was all due to the decline of marriage in the first place:
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/09/millennials-divorce-baby-boomers/571282/
“In the past 10 years, the percentage of American marriages that end in divorce has fallen, and in a new paper, the University of Maryland sociologist Philip Cohen quantified the drop-off: Between 2008 and 2016, the divorce rate declined by 18 percent overall. After accounting for the rising average age of married Americans and other demographic shifts during that time, Cohen found “a less steep decline—8 percent—but the pattern is the same.” That is, the divorce rate in 2016 was still lower than one would have predicted if the demographics of married people were the same then as in 2008. When I asked Andrew Cherlin, a sociology professor at Johns Hopkins University, how to make sense of this trend, he opened his explanation with something of a koan: “In order to get divorced,” he said, “you have to get married first.”
Perhaps the opening of a new mega-mosque in Cologne, scene of the new Year Eve sexual assaults of German women:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/cologne-new-years-eve-mass-sex-attacks-leaked-document-a7130476.html
This symbolises the end of traditional Germany, and its replacement by a migrant state, “Eurostan,” and Germanistan”:
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/09/27/germany-rises-as-eurostan-looms-closer/
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/rival-rallies-erdogan-opens-mega-mosque-cologne-1594688409
Regarding the Brett Kavanaugh US Supreme Court election debacle, I have been following the line that the progressives have been taking, that whatever women posing as victims say, must be believe, re rape allegations. This is utterly wrong because there have been a number of false rape accusations exposed, the now classic being the Columbia University mattress girl saga. Here is an article summing this one up, just so you know that I got my facts right on that one, since my mental decline is in full swing now:
“In 2015 the mattress girl, Emma Sulkowicz, became a global celebrity by turning what was found to be a false rape allegation into performance art by carrying her mattress with her everywhere on campus. She was protesting against Columbia’s decision not to take action against a young German student, Paul Nungesser, whom she’d accused of choking and anally raping her. Columbia has now reached a confidential settlement with Nungesser following his lawsuit claiming the university supported “an outrageous display of harassment and defamation” by allowing Sulkowicz for three years to use her mattress to hold campus protests where people openly called him a rapist. Sulkowicz was given academic credit for the performance as part of her visual arts major and was allowed to carry the mattress in her graduation ceremony.
Does the Bible prohibit homosexuality? By that I mean, if you pick up the book and read various passages do you find an explicit condemnation of homosexual practices? Remember, this was a book written long ago by God (we believe), so it is possible that there could be a “slight” conflict between its contends and modern politically correct culture. Simply read chapter 18 of Leviticus, if you dare. Do it at night, under the bed, with a torch so no-one sees you, including spy cameras. Generally, the liberals agree that the Bible does condemn homosexuality and say, “well, too bad for the book, as gay practices are correct and good.” Ok, I will not discuss that, suffering from intellectual cowardice. However, there is another approach to this debate, which rejects the common assumption here, that the Bible, especially Leviticus, does condemn homosexuality:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/21/opinion/sunday/bible-prohibit-gay-sex.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fopinion
The reference is to a theological paper by Idan Dershowitz, “Revealing Nakedness and Concealing Homosexual Intercourse: Legal and Lexical Evolution in Leviticus 18,” Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, vol. 6, 2017, pp. 510-526. I managed to find a pre-print version on the net. The argument seems to be that some earlier document from which Leviticus was rewritten did approve of male-to-male sexual penetration. Don’t be offended for any primary school kid would have heard about that. The author discusses in detail the uses of the expression “uncover nakedness.” As well, various ancient Near Eastern texts are examined, which as I read it, basically went along the lines of Leviticus 18 as we know it, so wouldn’t that undermine the Harvard academic’s case? I could not find proof of the claim that the existing manuscript is a historical homophobic construction, which could mean that the author is wrong, or that I am simply out of my depth here. However, this guy is not, and he offers a refutation:
http://www.gopusa.com/?p=50901?omhide=true
The end of Australia as we know it is proceeding according to plan:
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/shorten-faces-push-to-bring-in-gay-and-indigenous-mp-quotas/news-story/cd68a36004483350e298772dbf04d362
“Bill Shorten is facing internal pressure to follow through on a promise to consider quotas for gay and indigenous MPs, as his Labor team attempts to politicise women’s pay and representation in the workforce. Labor Left MPs have told The Australian they are angry the Opposition Leader has done nothing to follow through with his proposal in 2013 to consider quotas for gay MPs, which was viewed as an attempt by him to secure crucial votes to beat Anthony Albanese for the party leadership. “It was a big part of (Shorten’s) campaign and it has seemed to disappear,” one Labor MP told The Australian. In a manifesto of his policies sent to Labor members during the 2013 leadership showdown with Mr Albanese, Mr Shorten wrote that more needed to be done to ¬increase the diversity of Labor’s political candidates.
The last article I wrote ended with talk about the end times, and here I am with another article, further down the track on the same theme. Well, the source is from an email I received from the editor, who sits on the computer from 6 am to 9 pm everyday, feeding us juicy cyber worms throughout the day. Imagine us writers to be like hungry young birds in a nest, crying for food, and like a good mother bird, he feeds us, forgetting about the gender role confusion. Speaking of the young, and gender roles, and confusion, word association would lead us to pedophiles, who, like everyone else, want to come in from the cold (and molest your children):
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/pedophiles-are-now-calling-themselves-minor-attracted-persons-and-want-inclusion-in-lgbtq-movement/
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/09/pedophiles-lgbt-community/
“Pedophiles are rebranding themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBT community, according to several reports from LGBT news sites. According to Urban Dictionary, the blanket term MAP includes infantophiles (infants), pedophiles (pre-pubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Some MAPs also refer to themselves as NOMAPs or “Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons”. These pedophiles seek to be a part of the LGBT+ community, even going so far as to make a “Pride” flag for Gay Pride Month. Many blogs exist on Tumblr showing support for MAPs, claiming that they should be a part of the LGBT community and attempting to create “safe spaces” for these “minor attracted persons”. The blog “Pedophiles about Pedophilia” also presents many sob stories of “marginalized” pedophiles in pretty pastel colors, claiming that they mean no harm and just want to be loved like everyone else as shown in such headlines as “Why Pedophilia And Pedophiles Are Not A Risk To Children”, “Growing Up A Pedophile” and “How I came out as an anti-contact pedophile to the woman I love”. This name change seems to follow in the liberal trend of rebranding things by giving them more “politically correct” names, but is the next step really normalizing pedophilia?”
This story, as described, is a bit hard to understand, and even worse to articulate, and the source item does not yield any concise quotes to make life easier, but, here goes. Wait, I found something, floating here in cyber space, no, actually the International Space Station:
https://www.unz.com/ishamir/toilet-wars/
“There was a strange recent incident on the International Space Station (ISS). The pressure in the station had dropped. In the search of a possible leak, a small (2 mm) hole had been discovered in a wall of the Russian Soyuz spacecraft docked to the station. The hole was located near the toilet and covered by decorative fabric. The US astronauts demanded that their mission be aborted and they return to earth; the Russian cosmonauts just glued the hole with a bit of epoxy and the flight went on. It was promptly established that it was not a result of a meteorite strike; the hole had been drilled. Dmitry Rogozin, head of Roscosm said that it was probably done by a homesick astronaut. This version was considered just too bizarre. It was dismissed by all and sundry as a new proof of Russian goofiness. The preferred version said that the hole was drilled by a Russian worker on the ground, immediately before take-off, as you would expect from inept Russians.
If Mike Adams is right about Trump getting ready to finally take down the crooks, something which I believe it when I see it (Chris is writing on this, I think), then the libtards and power elites really do have something to fear from a spring cleaning of the Supreme Court, with the appointment of a conservative justice, Brett Kavanaugh. As expected from a filthy degenerate bunch, they have been trying to have the nomination withdrawn using alleged sex abuse as the issue. Up to now, the absurd claims have fallen over, clearly revealing the accusers of lying. Now this comes:
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/24/michael-avenatti-brett-kavanaugh-gang-rape-vulgar-high-school-yearbook/
What’s this? Gang rape? Who dreams up this stuff anyway? The same people scripting for the mass media?
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/23/ramirez-yale-classmates-deny-kavanaugh-allegations/
I think it was James Reed who told me, shock, horror, that the socialists in one Australian university/child minding centre were advocating an abortion clinic on campus. Why, don’t even walk across the road, just make it a one-stop shop, get your abortion, then go get your head refilled with libtard propaganda! However, as usual, the United States is leading the way into the promised land of liberal dystopia.
http://libtards.news/2018-09-18-teen-vogue-magazine-now-calling-for-abortion-clinics-on-college-campuses.html
“The fact is, teens are at an incredibly difficult age where they are neither children nor adults. Though they may look and sound like mature grownups, the simple fact is that they are not, and they are prone to making reckless and even dangerous decisions. Any publication that has teenagers as their target audience, therefore, needs to be incredibly mindful of the messages they send to this vulnerable and impressionable group. Apparently, the teen-focused glamour magazine Teen Vogue doesn’t see it that way. Instead of sticking to issues like young love and acne, this super liberal magazine recently published an article glorifying abortion, filled with feel-good stories about young girls “freed” by their ability to murder an innocent child. The article also bemoaned the fact that college students have to travel off campus to get an abortion – apparently, taking a life should take as little of your time as possible – and pushed for college campuses to provide medical abortion services. It also questioned “restrictions like parental consent laws,” which apparently make it even more inconvenient for teenage girls to deal with the consequences and responsibilities that come with being sexually active.”
Ok, abortion the elites say is a woman’s right under capitalist consumer commodification, but what about botched abortions where the whatever you call it, is born? Is the unnameable thing still the subject to the woman’s right?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/babies-born-alive-during-abortion-will-receive-no-help-from-the-council-of
“The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe is unwilling to take up the issue of babies who are born alive and left to die or killed after an unsuccessful late-term abortion. Reports from medical workers suggest that many of children born alive during botched abortions are “evacuated” along with hospital waste or left to die in another hospital room or in a storeroom, despite signs of life. Others receive lethal injections or are smothered. Documents furnished to LifeSiteNews show that a written question from a Spanish member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe submitted to the Committee at the beginning of this year will receive no answer, because the ministers could not reach consensus about what should happen in such an instance.
Women are attracted to “benevolently sexist” men, according to psychological research. Whenever I read those words, I go on red alert. What does it mean?
https://www.livescience.com/63623-why-women-like-sexist-men.html?utm_source=ls-newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20180922-ls
“If a man offers to help a woman with her heavy suitcase or to parallel park her car, what should she make of the offer? Is it an innocuous act of courtesy? Or is it a sexist insult to her strength and competence? Social psychologists who describe this behavior as "benevolent sexism" firmly favor the latter view. But researchers have also revealed a paradox: Women prefer men who behave in ways that could be described as benevolently sexist over those who don't. How could this be? Some say that women simply fail to see the ways benevolent sexism undermines them because they're misled by the flattering tone of this brand of kindness. Psychologists have even suggested that benevolent sexism is more harmful than overtly hostile sexism because it is insidious, acting like "a wolf in sheep's clothing." As social psychologists, we had reservations about these conclusions. Aren't women sophisticated enough to be able to tell when a man is being patronizing?’
As a high school science teacher, who has taught maths to the lower years, I always wondered how political correctness would be used to destroy mathematics, or its teaching. Now we have some idea:
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/09/10/penn-state-math-course-focuses-on-hillary-clintons-strong-character/
“A new math course at Penn State University this semester has a bizarre focus on Hillary Clinton’s “strong character.” According to a report from Campus Reform, a new math course at Penn State University focuses on everything besides math. Professor Marc Fabbri’s “Finite Mathematics” course covers everything from Hillary Clinton’s “strong character” to the “cultural intolerance” to President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Clean Water Act.
On the Penn State website, Fabbri’s course is described as an “introduction to logic, sets, probability.” But students who took Fabbri’s new course last spring say that the course is focused on other topics. Take for example the following excerpt from a text provided to students by Fabbri. “The emergence of the Tea Party played a central role in the 2008 U.S. presidential election,” the document reads. “The victor was Barack Obama who, like Bill Clinton, served as U.S. president for 8 years — the two men guided always by the strength of character and force of intellect of First Lady Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton.”
My son was looking on Quora, the geek science site, and saw a “joke’ question about whether a non-sexist rocket could be designed. The writers thought that it was a joke to regard the rocket as a phallic symbol, and played it for laughs. Obviously, these science guys have not been following what feminists have been saying about the gun debate, which is clearly a symbolic castration. But, to prove my point, I said to my son, that using the new Ducky search engine, I would find in under 15 seconds a crazy mainstream article that not only went far beyond the claim that rockets are sexist, but physics itself is.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/05/quantum-physics-oppressive-marginalized-people/
https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-minnesota-review/article-abstract/2017/88/69/28590/Assembled-BodiesReconfiguring-Quantum-Identities
Here is the abstract, and if anyone can understand it, they deserve a free cookie:
Across the world being transphobic is leading to either prosecution, or unemployment. This crime no longer needs one to express hatred, only to be saying something, anything regarded as inconvenient. The sun sets in the West; transphobic? Well, maybe. After all it is “binary” and assumes a rigid dichotomy between east and west.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/transphobic-swedish-professor-may-lose-job-after-noting-biological-differences
“A university professor in Sweden is under investigation for "anti-feminism" and "transphobia" after he said that there are fundamental differences between men and women which are "biologically founded" and that genders cannot be regarded as "social constructs alone," reports Academic Rights Watch. If you answer such a question you are under severe time pressure, you have to be extremely brief — and I used wording which I think was completely innocuous, and that apparently the student didn't,” Hesslow said. Hesslow was ordered to attend a meeting by Christer Larsson, chairman of the program board for medical education, after a female student complained that Hesslow had a "personal anti-feminist agenda." He was asked to distance himself from two specific comments; that gay women have a "male sexual orientation" and that the sexual orientation of transsexuals is "a matter of definition."
Isn’t it amazing how just when the elites need it, a problem person who is giving the globalists heart burn, has sex with some woman, typically a prostitute or porno star, and bingo, rape, or she is underage or whatever. Think of how convenient it was with Julian Assange. Now there is young Cody Wilson, who has been fighting for gun rights. Bingo, he has paid sex with a prostitute, and she turns out to be under aged:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-texas-crime-guns/texan-running-3-d-printed-guns-company-sent-back-to-u-s-by-taiwan-authorities-idUSKCN1M1236?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews
“A Texan running a 3-D printed guns company who flew to Taiwan as police investigated an accusation he had sex with an underage girl was deported back to the United States on Saturday after his U.S. passport was annulled, a Taiwanese official said. Cody Wilson, 30, was on Friday taken to immigration authorities in Taipei by officers from Taiwan’s Criminal Investigation Bureau, according to officials. He was ordered to leave Taiwan because he no longer has a valid travel document, said Zhang Wen-xiu, a director of the international affairs and law enforcement division at Taiwan’s National Immigration Agency. Zhang said Wilson, who was held by the agency, had been taken to Taipei’s Taoyuan International Airport for a flight to the United States on Saturday evening. He declined to say which U.S. city Wilson would be flying to. He said the agency was in touch with Wilson’s lawyer. Wilson had agreed to the arrangement and had “expressed willingness to return to the U.S. soon”, he added. The United States’ de facto embassy in Taipei declined to comment on the case, citing privacy concerns. The U.S. Marshals Service, which would likely be responsible for taking Wilson back to the United States, said in a statement it was aware of Wilson’s arrest and was “fully engaged with our international partners on this matter.”
The so-called transhuman movement looks forward to the perfectibility via uploading human consciousness into robot bodies, or so the high tech fantasy goes. Behind all of this is an agenda of eliminating the most undesirable aspect of the human condition for a cosmopolitan: race. But, what if robots turned out to have an emergent “racism” all of their own? That would throw a spanner into the globalist works:
https://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/09/13/robots-can-become-racist-and-sexist-all-on-their-own-study-finds.html
“A look at a new study that reveals how AI robots can independently develop prejudices like racism and sexism. Robots can develop prejudices like "racism and sexism" all on their own, a shocking new study has found. Artificial intelligence experts performed thousands of simulations on robot brains, revealing how they split off into groups and treat "outsiders" differently. Computer scientists and psychologists from Cardiff University and the USA's MIT teamed up to test how robots identify each other. But they also tested how they copy and learn behaviors from each other, too. The study, published in Scientific Reports, showed that virtual simulated robots would shun others, forming their own groups. The experiment involved a "give and take" system, where robots could choose which of their peers to donate to. As the virtual game unfolders, individuals would learn new donation strategies by copying other robots – to benefit themselves. It found that robots would donate to each other within small groups, denying outsiders to improve their own takings.
First it was Hellary Clinton, with her condemnation of Trump voters as “deplorables,” but now former Vice President Joe Biden, let us call him, “Vicey,” has lowered the bar of vilification much more, calling Trump voters, the “dregs of society”:
http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/former-vice-president-joe-biden-trump-supporters-are-the-dregs-of-society_09172018
https://www.dailywire.com/news/35931/joe-biden-calls-trump-supporters-dregs-society-joseph-curl
“Joe Biden just had his "deplorables" moment. Biden, who says he'll decided in January whether to run for president in 2020 but who is making all the moves of a presidential candidate, used a pro-LGBT Human Rights Campaign annual dinner on Saturday to rip President Trump. And in so doing, Biden had a moment reminiscent of Hillary Clinton, when she called Trump supporters "deplorables." Biden did his old act, starting off soft and avuncular before booming through his power points, punching the air and flailing about. "Despite losing in the courts, and in the court of opinion, these forces of intolerance remain determined to undermine and roll back the progress you all have made," he said. "This time they — not you — have an ally in the White House. This time they have an ally. They're a small percentage of the American people — virulent people, some of them the dregs of society." "And instead of using the full might of the executive branch to secure justice, dignity, safety for all, the president uses the White House as the literal — literal — bully pulpit, callously — callously — exerting his power over those who have little or none.”
Although Chris Knight and Charles Taylor (in Florida) cover the US political scene and its significance for the West, I feel some comment is required on the present controversy over the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court. The latest revelation is that, as alleged by Christine Blasey Ford, as a teenager, young Brett tried to force Ford to have sex, which is now rape. An alleged witness says that this event did not occur. The event allegedly took place four decades ago, and Ford does not remember much about it, apart form the man who may overturn the sacred judgment for abortion on demand, Roe v Wade, did it. But, Ford now wants a full FBI investigation, before testifying. Now that the Democrats face a threat to their sacred cow of abortion on demand, as well as a judge who will interpret the Constitution the way the Founding Fathers intended (originalism), it is necessary to destroy this nomination. There is no plausibility to a rape/sexual assault claim that took place so long ago, and then magically surfaces at the right political moment, by someone who is opposed to Trump.
https://gellerreport.com/2018/09/debra-katz-george-soros-kavanaugh.html/
The best thing here is to put ford’s claim to the test and sue her for defamation, if she fails the test. She is making the most serious of criminal accusations, against a white male, who seem to be the only one’s today who may be judged for rape. Not only that, but Ford is claiming that she thought that she was going to be raped and murdered too. At least she did not include Don Trump in her little narrative! Sorry, no one is more sympathetic to women’s plight than me, and I have covered the raping of Europe issue at this site in great detail. If Kavanaugh was a rapist, Ford had a duty to the public to expose him decades ago. It staggers belief to suppose that this convenient piece of dirt surfaces now. And, it seems that the FBI agrees, saying that “It’s totally inappropriate for someone to demand we use law enforcement resources to investigate a 35-year-old allegation when she won't go under oath and can't remember key details including when or where it happened.” My argument in a nutshell:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/19/fbi-will-not-launch-criminal-investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations.html
No, I am not alluding to the gender bender pop icon, but to another icon, George Soros, the man with the money, who is certainly very generous for global socialist causes:
https://gellerreport.com/2018/09/soros-paid-kavanaugh-protesters.html/
• “Activists backed by left-wing billionaires like George Soros are giving cash to protesters arrested for disrupting Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings.
• The cash is for the protesters to resolve their charges after an arrest.
• Activists also explained how individuals could be arrested and released in order to disrupt the hearing multiple times a day.
