Americans have more freedom of speech than we do in Australia, at least for a few more moments. Hence, if you are interested in reading a critique and deconstruction of “our greatest historian’ Geoffrey Blainey’s Triumph of the Nomads by Spencer Quinn look no further than:
https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/10/triumph-of-the-nomads/
Our side of politics tends to look up to Blainey for stating that Asianisation was proceeding faster than public opinion. My apologises if my memory is letting me down, but I do not recall Blainey actually saying that Australia should not be Asianised at all, that the country as is, had a right to autonomous existence. His 1984 statement was about the pace. Of course, it was his right to advance and defend what position he did, but he is no racial realist. His comments back in 1984, were meek and mild, but still quite reasonable, compared to what is said today. All for Australia, is not a book like the fantastic book by Alan James, New Britannia: The Rise and Decline of Anglo-Australia, (Renewal Publications, 2013), which explicitly defends Anglo-Australia, as an ethnic group with rights:
https://www.amazon.com.au/New-Britannia-Alan-James/dp/1300542926/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1540681549&sr=8-1&keywords=alan+james+new+britannia