Journalist Chris Kenny has written a well-balanced piece on the much-anticipated Supreme Court of South Australia case against the Covid vaccine mandates. Unlike many mainstream media pieces, this one is very fair and comprehensive, the way good journalism should be. “Now a major legal intervention in South Australia is set to test the legitimacy of that state’s emergency declarations, the proportionality of the government’s response and the legal and medical basis for vaccine mandates. It should spark a national debate about these vital issues, and will see key figures such as SA chief public health officer Nicola Spurrier and Police Commissioner Grant Stevens cross-examined, and it might fatally undermine the rationale for the vaccine mandates imposed in workplaces nationally.”
This is long overdue and key bureaucrats need to be cross-examined on all of these issues. I do not know how this case will be decided, but it will certainly generate some interesting material. And, it is likely to be in open court, allowing media coverage, at least by the alternative media.