Daniel Greenfield puts the case well against gun control, which is little more than people control at the end of the day, and although written for an American audience, the arguments are general and apply to Australia was well. The difference though between the two nations is that no state in Australia recognises that self-defence is a reason for having ownership of a gun, while that is written into the US Second Amendment, although the Left are moving on attacking that. But there is a clear absurdity in Australia at the deepest level, because it means that there can be no effective self-defence by the weak against the strong, such as large rapists against women and the elderly, or against multiple attackers. The police, as in the recent Texas shooting, are lucky to turn up after the event to do their report, let alone be there to serve and protect. It is the supreme paradox that makes us mere wage slaves, not citizens, for if one has no effective right to self- defence, then one has no real rights at all.
https://robertspencer.org/2022/06/the-moral-idiocy-of-gun-control