Before the Trump-gate bad-mouth-about-women scandal, Donald Trump Jr said that the Syrian refugee problem could be described as follows:
“If I had a bowl of skittles and told you just three would kill you.
Would you have a handful?”
Ref: http://katehon.com/article/syria-uk-and-funding-moderate-armed-opposition
A document produced last December by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, headed: “ UK Humanitarian Aid in Response to The Syria Conflict”, makes interesting reading. The British government it states, has spent “over £100 million” since 2012, “working closely with a range of actors” to “find a political solution to the conflict and prepare to rebuild the country in the post Assad era.” (Emphasis added.)
Ref: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45702.htm
When Mosul falls, Isis will flee to the safety of Syria. But what then?
The entire Isis caliphate army could be directed against the Assad government and its allies – a scenario which might cause some satisfaction in Washington.
Syria’s army and Hezbollah and Iranian allies are preparing for a massive invasion by thousands of Isis fighters who will be driven out of Iraq when Mosul falls. The real purpose behind the much-trumpeted US-planned "liberation" of the Iraqi city, the Syrian military suspect, is to swamp Syria with the hordes of Isis fighters who will flee their Iraqi capital in favour of their "mini-capital" of Raqqa inside Syria itself.
Read further: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article45702.htm
from JoNova's Website:
Bill Leak is a cartoonist, who did a cartoon highlighting the dismal state of some dysfunctional familes in central Australia. I can’t show you that cartoon and we can’t discuss appalling crime statistics nor why “women of a certain ethnic group are 30 times (or 80 times) more likely to be beaten and hospitalized.” Two women die every week but we can’t talk about the problem of people who stomp on someone else’s head because words might offend someone.)
Read further: http://joannenova.com.au/2016/10/dont-put-bill-leak-on-trial-lets-try-the-human-rights-commission-instead/
The trouble with wind
South Australia has on average over 40 per cent of its internally generated electricity derived from wind. This is one of the highest levels in the world for a load with a relatively small interconnection with other sources (the two interconnectors with Victoria have a capacity to supply about 20 per cent of the state's needs).
Wind/solar generation has two features that are of concern.
The first is that it is intrinsically high cost. As a mature technology, it will remain three times the cost of coal powered generation in Australia. It can only compete because it is subsidised by a regulatory charge on the consumer (thereby also not facing the same scrutiny if its support was through the Budget). It receives the subsidy whenever it runs, hence wind has an incentive to generate whenever it can, forcing established fossil fuel plant to be placed offline.
A counter-terrorism conference has heard that the collapse of ISIS will lead to thousands of fighters returning back to the West. (The Australian, October 7, 2016, p. 2) It was also heard that the frequency of terrorist attacks was on the rise to in the West and Islamic radicalisation was occurring quickly. There was, according to analysis by the Institute for Economics and Peace, a 650 percent increase in terrorism-related deaths between 2014 and 2015.
Returning terrorists will increase the lethality of terrorist attacks and also that of home-grown terrorists who did not go to Syria and Iraq, presumably through training. Our Financial Services Minister has said that “terrorism has the potential to cause significant damage to domestic economies” and would be a shock to “financial institutions or systems, on investor and consumer confidence, and on tourism.”
Common sense would dictate simply not letting these fighters back in, since the Federal Police have said that it will be difficult due to lack of evidence (due to security secrets) to charge them. But my bet is that not a single one will be prevented from returning to this land where all immigration is sacred.
“Faith is Fragile” wrote South Australian Senator Cori Bernardi and he says he wasn’t referring to a ‘religious’ faith. He continued: “Faith is fragile. Once it is lost, it is very hard to see it restored.”
“To many, the sentence above will be seen through the lens of religious faith alone, but the fragility of faith extends far beyond that realm. Our society depends on faith; faith in our institutions and in others is the single most important ingredient that unites our society.
If we believe that our highly evolved system of interaction, discipline and ethics is working for our betterment then we are more likely to respect it. In short, we have faith in it. But when we lose confidence in the system, the system itself starts to break down. For many, that seems to be happening now…”
Presidential candidate Hilary Clinton has provided the whole world with a clear example of why people are losing ‘faith’ in their nation’s politicians, politics, systems and institutions – they are no longer credible! These types are faithless to their own people, their own nation.
Leaked emails show Clinton professing different messages
www.businessinsider.com/leaked-emails-clinton-private-speech-trade-2016-10
A new "Patriotic Broadcasting Corporation" could better represent the identity of mainstream Australians and fight bias within the ABC, new One Nation senator Brian Burston said on Tuesday.
I have often thought that the project of the global super capitalists is so stupid that they must be preparing to leave the Earth, when chaos rules. Yet a recent report in the journal Scientific Reports indicates that galactic cosmic rays are likely to lead to space travellers developing “space brain,” a form of neurological degeneration with cognitive impairment, memory deficits and depression. And this is only from a three-year trip to Mars and back, let alone a life in space. (The Australian, October 11, 2016, p.3)
So the elite are stuck with us on this globe. There is no escape, so maybe it is time to recognise that if we die, then they will die too. The fates of all peoples are now interconnected.
Uber-globalist, Jewish billionaire investor George Soros has pledge $US 500 million in investments to assist refugees and migrants through his Open Society Foundations, a network of causes supporting globalist agendas. The main thrust of the new programme will be to assist migrants and refugees arriving in Europe, not to help them back to their homelands of course, but to settle in Europe (“the new normal”).
Along with this 51 corporations, including Facebook and Twitter, have collectively pledged $US 650 million for the same lucky folk. Again, the aim is resettlement and “integration”, not to deal with the problem which led to a majority of young men of military age who could have fought tyranny, fleeing with their mobile phones and “V” for victory signs to Europe for their safety.
Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun, October 1, 2016) points out that “hate speech” is taking a mutated meaning. A Perth woman seeing people posting “anti-marriage equality” stickers on a sign that she was standing in front of said: “Does anyone by chance know who is responsible for this hatred? I’d love to speak to them.” Yes, it was a rhetorical question. This is a common point of view of the “Yes” approach.
The sign said “Keep Marriage Man and Woman.” This sentiment, held by the vast majority of the human race throughout time, has now been regarded by proponents of the “new morality” as hate speech. But there is no point arguing with them: call it “late for dinner,” it will be opposed. “Hate” is fast losing any emotional impact it once had.
The great section 18C “non-debate” has ended. Malcolm Turnbull has said that he has more important things to do – no doubt working with his mate Obama to get in the TPP before either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump are elected president, because they both oppose the TPP.
Yes, the leader of the Liberals is too busy to defend what should be the fundamental liberal value, freedom of speech. Instead, energies must be devoted to be “freedom” of corporations – which are by definition collectivist entities – to be able to override all of the hard fought freedoms of the people through the globalist TPP.
The section 18 C non-debate closed with the multicult lobby having the final say, because, this is after all, their legislation. Free speech is not an absolute, they said, citing the example that one cannot falsely shout “fire” in a cinema. Nobody said it was and neither should be the multicult right not to be offended, especially since almost anything can offend somebody and the bar is at tripping level.
This article was written by Jeremy Lee who passed away a few years ago.
If the idea of a Police State was announced in advance, it would never happen! The people would resist, find leaders, rise up and stop it. But, of course, the loss of personal freedom never happens in one moment of time, but gradually, inch by inch, never moving fast enough to cause too much opposition, taking a backward step now and then, in order to take two forward steps later.
Mike Adams at Natural News.com, September 30, 2016, delivered a controversial article: “The Coming Collapse of Western Civilization: The Shocking Reason Why Liberal Americans are Weak, but Islamic Soldiers are Strong.”
He makes the argument that the military attacks on Muslim populations in the Middle East are killing off the weak and leaving survivors who will become super soldiers. It is Darwin’s natural selection and the survival of the fittest at work.
In the West there is selection pressure favouring the physically weak, those who follow the agenda of political correctness. For example, not mentioned by Adams, but relevant to his argument, is speculation by a Fort Myers doctor that male voters for Hillary Clinton may have low testosterone (ABC-7.com, October 2, 2016). It is quite possible that many Western men are being selected by unnatural selection to be beta rather than alpha males. The beta male, conforming to the system succeeds, but the physical alpha, the types who built Western civilisation, what Vera West calls the “John Wayne man,” are now no longer needed. They are more likely now to be unemployed and hence no longer contributing to the next generation, hence redundant.
What happens when feminism clashes with multiculturalism? It seems that multiculturalism wins. As reported in “‘Women Silenced’ in Stifling Culture of Aboriginal Unity,” (The Weekend Australian, October 1-2, 2016, p. 7), in the 1970s many female Aboriginal leaders put ethnic solidarity, “standing as a people” over feminist issues.
According to indigenous researcher Suzanne Ingram, Aboriginal women are still facing racial solidarity pressures, serving as “solidarity stewardesses serving a sophisticated silencing agenda,” on issues of domestic violence in their communities. Ms Ingram believes that the issue of “silencing” has got worse with women who speak out about black-on-black violence being seen as engaging in betrayal.
Her paper “Silent Drivers/Driving Silence – Aboriginal Women’s Voices on Domestic Violence,” published in Social Alternatives (vol. 35, 2016, pp. 6-12), cites alarming statistics that “intimate partner violence” can be as high as 38 times greater for Aboriginal women than non-Aboriginal women.
Armed with my trusty Spanish-English dictionary (and Google translator) I examined at Eluniversal.com, September 29, 2016: “Preocupa a la SRE Aumento de Nuevos Flujos Migratorios” – that Mexico is worried about a flood of African and Asian immigrants. The migrants are hoping to get into the US, perhaps concerned that Trump just might win and build his Great Wall of America.
Faced with this Mexico’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has said that many will have to be returned to their home countries and the Mexican government is now working with countries of the origin of the immigrants on deportations.
Will the bleeding hearts now start protesting against Mexico? Of course not; that would be too difficult for their one-dimension minds to process.
The Dalai Lama, head of the Tibetan Buddhist monks, said on ITV’s “Good Morning Britain” that refugees from the Middle East should return home for the purpose of rebuilding their country. The Dalai Lama, a refugee himself said: “The main effort should go to help their own country bring peace, in Syria, Libya or even Afghanistan. Generally, the people always feel, ‘oh one day we return.’ (They) should rebuild their own country.”
While accepting that refugees suffer, he felt that there were “too many at the moment. Europe, Germany in particular, cannot become an Arab country, Germany is Germany.”
However, as I see it, the globalist supercapitalists would be pleased for an Arab Germany and an Arab Europe. Beyond control of wealth – and face it, they already have that – is the goal of the slow and quiet extermination of the Nordic gene pool. As Northern European populations are small compared to the rest of the world, with below replacement birth rates due to the ethno-cultural wars beginning in the 1960s, these populations are ear-marked for demographic elimination.
No other hypothesis better accounts for all the data.
Almost all of us freedom movement folk, especially those in the US, have a world view model where the super-elite of the capitalist hyper-class secure their power through a one-world government, or through the rule of corporations. What has been called the “Deep State” – the ultimate rulers – are those committed to centralised one-world power structures.
An interesting different point of view has been given by Charles Hugh Smith who says that the capitalist superclass is becoming aware of the critical instabilities of globalisation and are preparing for a radical philosophical jumping of ship to autarky and self-sufficiency, because they are coming to accept that financialised globalisation leads to perpetual instability and unending cycles of boom and bust: http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct14/instability10-14.html.
The argument of Charles Smith is that there is a great U-turn, but I have yet to see evidence of the elite making it. Charles Smith is of course right in arguing that self-sufficiency is the only true stable state, but the elites appear incapable of recognising this and all evidence indicates that they are still committed to the globalist dream. I doubt very much if they are capable of change and are much more likely
A tremendous article by Maurice Newman (“Road to Tyranny is Paved with Leftie Assumptions,” The Australian, September 27, 2016, p. 14), deserves mention before it disappears down the memory hole.
The primarily Left Media, he says, does not publicise that in the July election almost 600,000 voters gave their first preference to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation. These are the Australian version of the “deplorables,” the term used by Hillary Clinton to dismiss the white dispossessed “uneducated.”
And Newman says that the chattering class must vilify these Australians with no debate “lest too many of us waver on the virtues of bigger government, central planning, more bloated bureaucracies, higher taxes, unaffordable welfare, a “carbon-free” economy, more regulations, open borders, gender-free and values-free schools and same-sex marriage: the sort of agenda that finds favour at the UN.”
