In previous articles I have covered the strange case of Cheddar Man, a fossil, whose genetic analysis allegedly showed that ancient Britons had black skin and blue eyes. More recent articles have shown that under criticism from other geneticists, the team has moved away from the claim. But surely they must have been aware of the problems from the beginning, so why make the big public statement? Clearly to support mass immigration. Yet there is a problem with this line of argument, as this article details:
http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2018/02/cheddar-man-using-archaeology-to-promote-immigration-cult.html
“consider the logical implications of this claim by Diekmann. Contrary to the pitch with which the discovery has been sold, it does not enhance but diminish the immigrationist point of view: IF it is true that the first Britons were brown, it means that Whites are unique to Europe. It means that we did not immigrate to Europe from another place, but are truly indigenous to Europe because we only evolved there. Whites are unique and indigenous to Europe — two hatefacts of the highest order to immigrationists. Rather than weakening the identity relation between being European and being White, a brown Cheddar man actually deconstructs the notion that ‘everybody is an immigrant’ — Whites aren’t in Europe. And there are even more implications: