The debate, was started by singer Kamahl, and is spreading. He claimed that the government was spending at least $40 billion a year on indigenous people. Naturally, the mainstream media denied it; no-one said that this was a good thing, and ten times that amount should be spent. The Left-wing fact checkers said that the figure was $ 4.5 billion, which is a massive amount in its own right. Sky News host Peta Credlin replied that when one considers overall budget figures, Kamahl was right. “Adjusting the 2016 figure in the Productivity Commission's report for inflation, well, that gives us now a figure of $39.5 billion in Aboriginal spending today. 

“So Kamahl last night on The Project was actually spot on with his $40 billion figure.”

Australian music icon, John Farnham, lent his song You’re the Voice to the Yes side, and they played in their ads. But, polling research has shown that the song may have had an adverse effect upon the Yes campaign, with 66 percent of undecided voters saying the song had no impact upon them at all. Why might this be?

Well the 1986 song is getting a bit old now by music standards. It;’ lyrics are a bit repetitive and it is not clear what song is actually about. It could have been used just as well be for No side:

Here is an example of technology that could blow up in one’s face, like the cartoon cigars, in a worst-case, as yet, hypothetical scenario. Molnupiravir is a drug given to vulnerable Covid suffers who may be fighting cancer or liver and kidney disease. However, wonderful as that is, there are concerns that the mechanism by which the drug works could backfire. The drug causes mutations in the virus, supposedly weakening it. But, there have been concerns raised that some that mutations may not kill off the virus, make the virus more transmissible or severe, or allow it to bypass immunity from previous infections or vaccines, or produce new variants.

Are just concerns justified? We simply do not know yet; it is yet another great unknown in Covid research. But if true, it could be a problem, depending upon what the mutated virus is like.

There were numerous reports of the ill-effects of the Covid mRNA vaxxes upon women’s menstruation cycle, and Dr Naomi Wolf is a leading figure exposing this. Bizarre things have been widely reported, such as stopped periods, ultra-heavy bleeding, even post-menopausal women, bleeding. And now the results of a large study have been published in the mainstream science journal, Nature, which links the Covid vaxxes to unexpected vaginal bleeding: “Women who don’t menstruate — including postmenopausal women and those on contraceptives — were several times more likely to experience unexpected vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination than before the vaccines were offered.” The study found that the risk of experiencing unexpected bleeding was three to five times higher in the month after vaccination.

The issue that was not explored was why this was so? What does the mRNA vax do to cause the unexpected bleeding? Normally unexpected bleeding is a matter of medical concern, so something in the vax must be doing this, no doubt, the mRNA spike protein. In a normal world, vaccines were halted which had less ill-effects than this, but with the sacred Covid shots it is full speed ahead.

There are a lot of angry fried chicken lovers who are frustrated by another KFC outlet going cashless, in the NSW town of Morisset. People are calling for a boycott, but I suppose if only those boycotting are cash with no card, it won’t get far. The card wielders will be tucking into all of that fried feast, and loving it. While it all lasts.

What we will see now is something of a death of a million cuts, as firms follow the lead and go cashless. A dummy run was made during the Covid freak-out, with fear about germs on bank notes. But now we are facing the real threat, every day. There needs to be an organised mass movement for the preservation of cash; SAVE OUR CASH!

Big Pharma is promoting its latest Covid jab, the formulated monovalent Covid shots by Pfizer and Moderna. The vaxxes are directed to Omicron variant XBB.1.5, this has now been replaced by other strains, the dominant strains right now are EG.5 and FL.1.5.1, so even if it did work, it is not known how it will act against the newest variants. But, no matter; the push will be for multiple shots of this goo as well, continuing the endless vax cycle. Pfizer’s testing involved 10 mice. Moderna tested on 50 adults, one of whom required medical attention due to an adverse event. This gives a potential serious adverse event ratio of 1 in 50, which is not a good start.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/26/mice-test-pfizer-covid-vaccine.aspx?ui=4b76ef641adf6eb9d4ff474498ab322ff93fc0a1359d95e535955e5de58beefb&sd=20190530&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1Read

So, Dan Andrews has resigned, after so many world firsts, such as staging the world’s longest Covid lockdowns in Victoria. As documented by Rebekah Barnett, it does not end there, with the Australian Financial Review saying  he “trashed Victoria’s finances,” leaving behind “a nasty financial cocktail” of debt and high borrowing costs. Now that is an achievement, so he is getting out on a high note. There is one social media post I saw saying that he will be the Australian delegate to the World Economic Forum, beginning on the 27 September 2023, today. I hope he can aid those globalists as much as he aided the state of Victoria.

And, after the lockdown misery, the majority of Victorians voted for him, so with the ideology of dumocracy, can we really complain?

This is a great concern to the rule of law, with federal judges refusing to hear cases because they may become personally liable. This fear is creating chaos in the court. The issue arose from a case where a man was wrongfully jailed by a judge on a contempt of court charge. It has held in the Federal court that the judge as personally liable.

I think this decision was wrongly decided on public interest grounds, precisely for the present situation it has created. Judges will not deliver current judgments if hey have to look over their shoulders for personal litigation.

I had hoped that the objections of 11 countries to the UN declaration on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response would slow it down, it formally having to be submitted to a vote by the full assembly. But no, the president of the UN General Assembly (UNGA), has ignored procedure, approved the document, and it moves ahead. The globalist mean business here and are determined to set up the health branch of the New World Order next year.

While the health authorities still have not come clean and stated that the MRNA spike proteins do travel around the body, lodging in organs such as the breasts and ovaries, a new study, published in the journal The Lancet, has found that mRNA from the Covid vax in breast milk. The spike proteins were present  45 hours after the jab. The authors did not see any problem with this, but did add a caution: “Although we believe breastfeeding after mRNA vaccination is safe, a dialogue between a breastfeeding mother and her healthcare provider should address the benefit/risk considerations of breastfeeding in the first two days after maternal mRNA vaccination.”

But, there is an inconsistency here, as if breastfeeding after the mRNA jab is safe, then there are no real benefit/ risk considerations. Contrary to that conclusion, the safety will be as function of the existing Covid vax safety, and that, as has been documented at this blog from summaries of numerous  reports and studies, is open to debate.

Who knows what Joe Biden was thinking when he gave his reflections on the biased presentation of multiracial couples in TV ads. He said that this was because they were selling soap. Nope, selling woke.

It is a healthy sign to see so many grassroots people of all colours, shapes and sizes coming out in the No rallies that occurred across Australia. The lamestream media did not give any supportive coverage, and from what I have read on social media, they have under-estimated the number of people who did attend. But, that is expected, the media always does this to the side it is not supporting; just look at the coverage of the US 2016 elections, where the polls and media were wrong up to the last moment, because they were hoping that by misrepresenting Trump’s support, people would not want to be on the losing side. Ha, that doesn’t even work for sports teams!

But, it matters not. The momentum is beginning to be gained by the No side despite the vast money the woke corporates have flung into the campaign for Yes. I will be laughing to see them lose their millions. They richly deserve it. As well, a  No person may no longer wish to  spend their hard-earned money with these firms, if alternatives are available. That is consumer choice, right?

I am no expert on economics, but the thought just popped into my head another reason why the banks may want to eliminate cash. Fractional reserve banking operates as follows: “Fractional-reserve banking is the system of banking operating in almost all countries worldwide, under which banks that take deposits from the public are required to hold a proportion of their deposit liabilities in liquid assets as a reserve, and are at liberty to lend the remainder to borrowers. Bank reserves are held as cash in the bank or as balances in the bank's account at the central bank. The country's central bank determines the minimum amount that banks must hold in liquid assets, called the "reserve requirement" or "reserve ratio". Most commercial banks hold more than this minimum amount as excess reserves.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking#:~:text=Fractional%2Dreserve%20banking%20is%20the,lend%20the%20remainder%20to%20borrowers.

The Senate inquiry into bank closures and cashlessness has had a public hearing at Junee, about 45 kilometres from Wagga Wagga, to get a taste of what rural Australia  thinks about the state of banking and all the agendas that are now being played out. Banks have been closing, and there was only a last-minute pause by the last remaining bank, the Commonwealth Bank. The inquiry heard from older Australians who were not fully computer illiterate, that the move to a cashless system would leave such older people vulnerable to scams and mistakes for which in the on-line world there is no forgiveness, only financial disaster. Senator Canavan said:

"There has to be a role for government oversight here … to pull in those private organisations to serve the social goods, like providing a central service," he said.

CommBank, NAB and ANZ making some of their branches cashless and Macquarie Bank has announced that its cash services would be phased out entirely by 2025. At a government inquiry the boss of the Commonwealth Banks said that there is a decreasing demand for cash, and that “transporting and making cash available around our vast country involves the considerable expense of logistics and security.” Customers are paying about $ 40 each per annum to keep cash in circulation.

First, I think we need some statistics other than from the banks about the decline of cash. Go into any supermarket, and yes, some people pay by card, but most pay by cash, so I doubt this. Second, if customers are paying, what is the big boss worrying about? Yes, they have come a long way from the early ideals discussed by D. J. Amos in The Story of the Commonwealth Bank:

The Pope has proclaimed tht there is no immigration crisis in Europe. He should spend some time on the streets of Hale, no, not Hell, Germany, where organised gangs, many composed of foreigners (around 40 percent), are targeting school children. Police are not doing much because of the fear of being called “racists.” Children are thus having to arm themselves, with what weapons they have, such as knives. With the failure of police, too woke to work, parents have organised a citizens’ defence group to fight back.

In the end, with the breakdown of the institutions of the West, people will be forced back to rely upon their own community resources, even for self-protection.

Australia continues to be sold off, and sold out by our political class. Australia is being swamp by Chinese millionaires who are profoundly impacting upon the property markets.

Australia’s Significant Investor Visa (SIV) program had allowed wealthy foreigners to purchase Australian citizenship by investing $5 million into qualifying assets or ventures, but the program is to be axed, due to concerns about money laundering and “dirty money” flows into Australia. It is hard to see how the present open border migration for the rich avoids any of the past problems. Where is the money coming from? Does the political class care? Answer; no.

There are lessons for Australia from Texas. Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton has been acquitted of the impeachment charges, and he appeared on a turbo-charged episode of Tucker Carlson. As a conservative, Paxton has got up the snouts of the Democrat machine, so naturally they would attempt to pay him back with an impeachment. One of the things the Democrats did not like was Paxton’s pursuit of the massive electoral fraud in the system, mainly from the mail-in voting, where it becomes impossible to knew how many are honest.

In the interview, he outlined the role played by what he calls “Vichy Republicans,” or traitor Republicans, who are junior partners in crime with the Democrat regime. They all support open borders immigration, the Ukraine war, and possibly war against Russia, and are completely on board with all that Big Pharma says and does, given the money tossed their way. And, they are opposed to Donald Trump. This alliance is seen across the West, including Australia, as far as I have ascertained from a distance, since most of the Liberal and Labor parties are pro-mass migration, regardless of the costs to the Australian people, just like our equivalents. As well, the Australian political class may be even more under the thumb of Big Pharma than even us in the US, and from the US even our lamestream media was shocked by the lockdowns in Victoria.   

When I saw this piece at the liberal/Left The Conversation.com, I thought I could predict the response that would be made by Paul Formosa, Professor and Head of the Department of Philosophy, and Co-Director of the Macquire University Ethics & Agency Research Centre, Macquarie University. So, let’s go with his response to the first question, should the Australian people decide what rights the Indigenous people get.

The UK is racing ahead with electric car mania, fed by the climate change hysterics. Despite the prime minister’s reassurances, the Transport Secretary is running the show, and the zero-emission vehicle mandate, will require 22 percent of cars sold by manufacturers to be electric from 2024, and by 2030, the quota will gradually rise to 80 percent. Carmakers who cannot reach the annual targets must either, purchase credits from rivals, sell more electric vehicles in future years or pay a fine of £15,000 per car.

All this is proceeding without a clear plan as to how these electric cars are going to be recharged each day, given that the grid is already under stress. Probably that is the plan, not to save the British society, but to sink it, so the New World Order can rebuild things, their way. And the UK is very much the globalist test case on transport, and be sure these policies will be dumped upon Australia.