Zero Net is a War Against the Ordinary People By James Reed
The UK Institute for Community Studies (ICS), has released a report, Our Journey to Net Zero, which undertakes a devastating critique of the UK government's climate change policies, relevant to Australia as well. The conclusion is stark, with the policies set to "make the poor poorer, and push struggling communities further into deprivation and exclusion." Unemployment will rise, with the close-down of "carbon incorrect" (my term) industries, which once supplied work and livelihood to workers. Low-income earners, and the unemployed will struggle with a cost-of-living crisis, facing food, accommodation, transport, and heating issues. And apart from the poor, the changes that zero net will require are so radical that even the present middle class may be hit hard and face a similar decline in their standard of living.
While one would have thought that all of this presented a decisive case against zero net, the report still operates within its framework, accepting the mainstream climate narrative. It hopes to find ways of lessening the economic pain people will experience. To my mind that is impossible. There needs to be full opposition to zero net because the climate change alarmist paradigm itself is arguably flawed. People should not suffer for no real reason at all. Oh, and if so, make it the elites who suffer first!
https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/02/27/net-zero-is-a-war-on-the-working-class/
"It's official. Net Zero will make us poorer. A new report finds that the British government's climate-change policies are likely to 'make the poor poorer, and push struggling communities further into deprivation and exclusion'.
Our Journey to Net Zero, by the Institute for Community Studies (ICS), shows that the transition to Net Zero will cause a rise in unemployment, as carbon-intensive industries are forcibly restructured. Food will become more expensive. And the eco-friendly changes we'll all be forced to make, such as insulating our homes or switching to electric cars, will be extremely difficult 'for low-income households'. The ICS concludes that the poorest 40 per cent of households are at risk of falling into 'transition poverty'.
As shocking as this statistic is, the report is no rant. A team of researchers from ICS, Trinity College Dublin, and the universities of Leeds and York have thoroughly reviewed the policy changes and instruments – subsidies, taxation and so on – most likely to prove effective in reducing emissions of CO2. And they have concluded that these Net Zero measures will push down living standards for a lot of people in the UK.
Essentially, the general effect of Net Zero is similar to that of regressive taxation. Just as a tax that is the same for everyone will most hurt those who earn the least, Net Zero policies mete out more pain to those who are least well-off. This won't just affect the very poorest though. As the ICS warns, even 'middle-income households that were not previously experiencing financial precarity' might struggle.
The report also highlights the other depredations brought about by Net Zero. For instance, the added cost and difficulty of car travel will reduce people's leisure opportunities.
The report certainly pulls no punches about the downsides of Net Zero. But it does not challenge the green transition itself. It instead calls for a 'just' transition to ease the socio-economic pain caused – a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine go down.
The report even complains that the disadvantages brought about by Net Zero policies are being exploited 'by those who are against transition to Net Zero'. Mentioning populist opposition to anti-car schemes like low-emission zones and low-traffic neighbourhoods, it says that some activists are 'provoking political flashpoints and civic revolts concerning "rights and freedoms"'. To get round such opposition, the report calls for more popular participation in Net Zero policymaking. The transition, it says, can be 'managed more fairly with the voice and participation of the households and communities it affects'.
Yet in the context of a report exposing the terrible privations Net Zero will visit on society, this call for greater participation rings hollow. It sounds like an attempt to mobilise the poor for their own impoverishment."
Comments