WTC 7: The Collapse That Defies Logic, By Professor X (Math/Physics)

On September 11, 2001, World Trade Center Building 7 fell in a manner that has baffled engineers and sceptics alike. Official reports insist fire caused the collapse, but a closer look, especially compared to other high-rise fires, makes that claim look increasingly implausible.

Step 1: Symmetry That Screams "Controlled"

WTC 7 didn't just topple. It fell almost perfectly straight down, with all sides collapsing evenly, like a classic controlled demolition. Fires typically eat away unevenly, producing tilted, lopsided failures. Yet WTC 7's descent was unnervingly symmetrical.

Step 2: Free-Fall Mystery

For roughly 2.25 seconds, the building dropped at near free-fall speed. In a natural fire scenario, the weight of intact steel columns should slow the fall. The fact that the building essentially "dropped" suggests resistance vanished, an extraordinary event that fire alone struggles to explain.

Step 3: Grenfell Tower Comparison

Consider Grenfell Tower in London. Built in the same era, it burned for over 60 hours in 2017. Flames tore through the interior, gutting floors and destroying materials, yet the structure stood. If WTC 7's fire-only collapse is credible, why didn't Grenfell crumble under even more intense, prolonged fire?

Step 4: No Precedent

Modern steel-framed high-rises rarely, if ever, collapse entirely from fire. They can warp, sag, or suffer partial failure, but a total, symmetrical collapse? Unprecedented. WTC 7 didn't just fail, it vanished into a perfect vertical footprint, something engineer critics say is virtually impossible from fire alone.

Step 5: Structural Odds

WTC 7 had a complex interior with trusses and multiple load paths. For fire to simultaneously weaken all critical points and trigger a perfectly timed collapse is statistically absurd. NIST's "column 79 failure" theory demands an unlikely chain reaction with perfect timing.

Step 6: The Questions Remain

Why did WTC 7 free-fall when fire should have slowed it?

Why did Grenfell survive when it burned far longer and hotter?

How does symmetrical collapse make sense under the fire-only narrative?

Bottom Line

WTC 7's fall doesn't match anything engineers have ever seen. Symmetry, free-fall, and lack of precedent all point to a highly unusual event, one that fire alone cannot convincingly explain. For those still buying the mainstream story, the facts about WTC 7 suggest it's time to ask the hard question: who did it,who did 9/11, and why?

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/wtc-building-7-sabotage-in-plain