Would the Deep State Nuke Itself in the Foot? By Chris Knight

     If Americans do not surrender their guns, so that they can be passively, or maybe actively genocided, what will the Deep State do? I had thought that a New World Order army could be rolled out, since many military and police, unlike those in Australia, who are totally cucked and deracinated, would resist. But, the other possibility is that the Deepers go deeper and just nuke everything! A recent blog-fest has uncovered this delightful solution to all woes:
  https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/16/eric-swalwell-if-gun-owners-defy-assault-weapons-ban-the-government-has-nukes/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

“Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) defended a potential “assault weapons” buyback Friday afternoon, saying that if gun owners defy a legislative ban, “the government has nukes.” The exchange began with conservative Twitter commentator Joe Biggs responding to a story on Swalwell’s Thursday op-ed in USA Today, titled “Ban assault weapons, buy them back, go after resisters.” “@RepSwalwell wants a war,” Biggs wrote. “Because that’s what you would get.”

Joe Biggs
@Rambobiggs

So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your fucking mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

John Cardillo
@johncardillo
Make no mistake, Democrats want to eradicate the Second Amendment, ban and seize all guns, and have all power rest with the state. These people are dangerously obsessed with power. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/dem-congressman-force-gun-owners-sell-assault-weapons-n871066 … Swalwell responded by noting the government’s nuclear arsenal, writing: “And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.”

Joe Biggs
@Rambobiggs
 · Nov 17, 2018

So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your f**king mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.

Rep. Eric Swalwell
@RepSwalwell

And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities. Biggs responded by asking, “So our government would nuke its own country in order to take guns? Wow.”

  Swalwell countered by asking Biggs to quit being “dramatic” about the casual reference to weapons of mass destruction:

Joe Biggs
@Rambobiggs
 · Nov 17, 2018

Replying to @RepSwalwell
So our government would nuke its own country in order to take guns? Wow

Rep. Eric Swalwell
@RepSwalwell

Don’t be so dramatic. You claiming you need a gun to protect yourself against the government is ludicrous. But you seem like a reasonable person. If an assault weapons ban happens, I’m sure you’ll follow law.

Rep. Eric Swalwell
@RepSwalwell

Don’t be so dramatic. No one is nuking anyone or threatening that. I’m telling you this is not the 18th Century. The argument that you would go to war with your government if an assault weapons ban was in place is ludicrous and inflames the gun debate. Which is what you want.

Joe Biggs
@Rambobiggs
Replying to @RepSwalwell
So our government would nuke its own country in order to take guns? Wow

     On May 21, 2018, Breitbart News reported that Swalwell pushed an “assault weapons” ban that would be based on buybacks with criminal charges for those who did not comply. A similar buyback was used by the Australia government.”

    The government of Australia did not really need the 1996 gun ban for national security reasons because the Australian population would never resist the sort of tyranny discussed above. It is difficult enough to try and get people in the safety of their own homes to write to politicians, let alone do what is contemplated above. Yet Americans, who fought one civil war, could be different, and while like Australians, they are prepared to allow their country to become part of Mexico (in their case), the gun issue is personal. There could be resistance.  Hence, maybe using nuclear weapons is not such a bad idea. Start with nuking California, then Washington DC, and all blue states. Any guns would either be destroyed of rendered inoperative via radioactivity. Potential gun users would be vaporised, which is a problem solved. In fact, nuking the entire country would deliver a quick solution to all of America’s problems, as after all, no country, no racism. Maybe if they can spare 50 or 60 bombs, dropped on Australia, that would wake up the locals from their otherwise eternal sleep as well!!! Shucks, just kidding; I don’t think they would waste a bomb on us!

     On a more serious note, the survivalist gurus, Col. Jeff Cooper said on this ultimate showdown issue: “It is interesting to hear certain kinds of people insist that the citizen cannot fight the government. This would have been news to the men of Lexington and Concord, as well as the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan. The citizen most certainly can fight the government, and usually wins when he tries. Organized national armies are useful primarily for fighting against other organized national armies. When they try to fight against the people, they find themselves at a very serious disadvantage. If you will just look around at the state of the world today, you will see that the guerillero has the upper hand. Irregulars usually defeat regulars, providing they have the will. Such fighting is horrible to contemplate, but will continue to dominate brute strength.”

It will be interesting to see how things pan out in America, if we here  are still breathing.
  https://survivalblog.com/guest-post-asymmetrical-warfare-4gw-militia-groups-americas-domestic-viet-cong-part-1/

     Disclaimer: mere journalistic satire covering on this public arena debate does not imply any endorsement of any parties point of view, or the advocation of violence, the use of nuclear weapons, or nuclear-based  products, or any alleged cure for dandruff, baldness or ED, whatever that is.