World War III Before the Election? By James Reed

Natural News.com has also agreed that the final red line has been crossed, with the issue of whether the United States allows the Ukraine to use long-range missiles to strike at targets deep inside of Russia. Russian president Vladimir Putin warned that if this occurs, then Russia would be a war with the West. According to Congressman Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) as cited by Axios journalist Julie Grace Brufke, the Biden administration intends to is to lift all restrictions on Kiev's use of U.S.-provided ATACMs (Army Tactical Missile System), and Biden has confirmed that Washington is "working that out now." Washington has already delivered the missiles to Zelensky, and why would that be done unless the intention was for the missiles to be fired at some point?

Thus, it seems clear that these missiles will be fired upon Russia. Then it will come down to whether Putin keeps to his promise to retaliate against American cities. The proposal by Mike Adams is that will be done before the US elections, so that either the elections are cancelled, or more likely, the American people are terrified into accepting the status quo, or even more likely, civilisation is destroyed by nuclear exchanges. This kind of makes one's pet political issues look petty. There is not much discussion and analysis of what one does if TSHTF via nukes. I guess survivors play it by ear.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-15-us-desperately-trying-ignite-wwiii-before-election.html

"The final and most serious of Moscow's "red lines" was crossed this week after the United States decided to "allow" Ukraine to use the weapons it and other Western nations donated to strike targets deep within Russian territory.

Washington's plan, according to Congressman Michael McCaul (R-Tex.) as cited by Axios journalist Julie Grace Brufke, is to lift all restrictions on Kiev's use of U.S.-provided ATACMs (Army Tactical Missile System). President Biden has confirmed that Washington is "working that out now."

Pretty much all the other major Western nations are in agreement that crossing Vladimir Putin's infamous red lines is both "permissible" and reasonable in light of all the deep state assets and criminal schemes, i.e., human trafficking, that are protected by Ukraine's very existence under Volodymyr Zelensky.

Up until now, the West has merely been sending Ukraine the weapons and letting Zelensky do with them as he wishes, just so long as he does not use them to strike deep within Russian territory. This changed after Zelensky threw a hissy fit and demanded that he be allowed to use all of his new toys where Putin told him not to.

"So far, the United States has given Kiev about $200 billion or more in both funding and military equipment and weapons," reports SHTFplan.com about these latest developments.

"Kiev has been clamoring for the restrictions against using long-range missiles as long-range missiles to be lifted since May. That also begs the question; was the U.S. always going to 'allow' Ukraine to cross Russia's red lines? Because Washington did give kiev [sic] the long-range weaponry, so why would they ban them from using it indefinitely?"

Has the final red line been crossed?

Truth be told, the West likely planned this whole thing out ages ago. Western powers pretended to just be arming Ukraine for its own "self-defense," knowing all the while that eventually Zelensky would use them against Russia in a major provocation towards World War III.

"This should serve as a warning for the U.S.," SHTFplan.com warns. "If Kiev does strike Russian territory using these donated weapons, it may be the final straw as Russia's last red line is crossed."

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced the policy changes this week during a visit to Kiev with David Lammy, his United Kingdom counterpart.

"I talked to Blinken two days ago, and he is traveling with his counterpart from the UK to Kiev to basically tell them that they will allow them [to hit Russia with ATACMS]," McCaul confirmed.

According to State Department spokesman Matt Miller, Blinken flew to Kiev "to show continued support for Ukraine's defense." Miller made no mention of any policy changes being made.

What Blinken did was merely "signal," according to Bloomberg, that Washington intends to change the rules now that reports have surfaced claiming that Iran has supplied Russia with ballistic missiles. Iran, in response, claims it did no such thing, claiming it supports neither side of the conflict.

Whenever the U.S. needs an excuse to send more cash or weapons to foreign criminals, it most often trots out the "Iran is producing nuclear weapons" line. In this case, they upped the ante by claiming that Iran is sending those nuclear weapons to Russia, the other bogeyman Washington routinely uses to try to push unpopular foreign policy.

"Forget that we are supporting a fake president, forget that we are supporting an aggressor on RF (Russian Federation) territory and forget that we are supporting a cabal that is killing Christians only. What is this mindset? You can't understand their mental setup anymore," one commenter wrote about the insanity of the West.