Woody Harrelson on the Movie, Too Absurd to Make (Covid Mandates) By James Reed

Actor Woody Harrelson gave a comedy stand up segment which did not get the usual hearty audience laugh. Rather, stunned silence as the penny dropped. He said that there is a movie script too implausible for Hollywood to make. “[T]he biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes, and people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over.” The movie would not be made, but one of the reasons not said by good old Woody, is that the “drug cartels” would prevent something like that. However, the plot of I am Legend (2007) has a cancer vaccine turning everyone into zombies, so at least one past movie has dared to contemplate problems with a sacred vax.

https://brownstone.org/articles/woody-harrelson-demonstrates-the-pain-of-truth/?utm_medium=onesignal&utm_source=push

“What’s strange about his observation is just how close to reality we are discovering that this story truly is. Initially, I was pretty sure that the lockdowns extended from a primitive intellectual error, the belief that respiratory pathogens like cooties could be made non-vexing by simply eliminating human contact. It’s a preposterous supposition and one deeply dangerous to the whole idea of human freedom. 

When the masks came along, it struck me as tremendously obvious that their only purpose was to give people a means to believe that they were doing something, plus they provide an effective symbol of a panicked epoch that many people wanted to last as long as possible. 

Even in April 2020, when the former head of virology for the Gates Foundation called me and told me very clearly that the whole idea of lockdowns was to wait for the vaccine, I could not process the information. This is because I knew based on my reading that there would be no sterilizing vaccine for a coronavirus. A new technology claiming to stop infection and spread would require many years of testing, maybe ten. We cannot stay locked down that long. Society would be in ruins. 

The caller assured me that it was coming much sooner. I found that to be ridiculous, even dangerous. But I still had not made the connection: the purpose of the lockdown was to buy time for the production and distribution of a vaccine. An even darker interpretation of lockdowns would be that influential people need to preserve population-wide immunological naivete in order to demonstrate the value of vaccine technology. 

As for media and politicians, the idea that they are bought off by Big Pharma is no longer in dispute. We’ve seen too many running reels of “brought to you by Pfizer” on every form of entertainment, and we’ve seen the receipts. 

So Harrelson’s story is not entirely wrong. Indeed, in the guise of comedy, he has come closer to truth than any mainstream venue of entertainment has yet to reveal.”

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Tuesday, 26 November 2024

Captcha Image