Why was Covid Omicron Cooked Up in a Dark and Damp Lab by Evil Techno-Wizards? By Brian Simpson
I have been following the line of investigation that Covid Omicron has been created in a lab, then released, to keep the global tyranny flowing. Here is some more from Infowars.com, our go-to site for all things shiny and conspiratorial, and ultimately, correct.
“With several top doctors around the world saying there’s a possibility the Omicron variant of Covid-19 was created in a lab and only recently released, the next question would inevitably be, why?
As Infowars reported on Tuesday, Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Robert Malone are floating the scenario that the variant could be a manmade virus, as was the most likely case with Covid-19.
In his article published Tuesday, Dr. Mercola asked, “Is Omicron Another Lab Creation?”
According to the report, “There’s a curious feature of Omicron that hints at it having been modified in a lab… It doesn’t seem to belong to any of the evolutionary branches that have emerged since.”
A video posted on Twitter shows the chronological genomic epidemiology of Covid variants and clearly indicates the Omicron variant is different than others.
Essentially, scientists can see that Omicron evolved from a strain that has been circulating since mid-2020, but they have no record of the strain’s mutations since then.
Now, a Russian virologist named Petr Chumakov is also promoting the chance that the Omicron strain was artificially created.
Chumakov is a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and is Head of the Cell Proliferation Laboratory at the V.A. Engelhardt RAS.
During a recent interview with Radio Russia, the virus expert told listeners that other specialists cannot explain how the strain suddenly appeared on its own.
“This is not just a mutation,” he said. “It was they who collected all the mutations that were known that were already encountered in this virus spontaneously, that is, when it evolved … They collected all these mutations in one strain, moreover, they also introduced there an insert of three amino acids that are characteristic of the coronavirus season. Nobody can explain how it could arise independently in this strain.”
Chumakov insinuated the British released the virus in order to bring the pandemic to a halt, saying, “I believe it is so that these are the British. We decided to end the pandemic now, because now the time has come for some decisive changes in the world.”
Backing his theory that the new strain was intentionally released for an overall good reason is the fact that Omicron turned out to be “super-attenuated”.
“Now just such a moment has come when, for some political reason, they decided to quickly wrap up the pandemic,” the virologist said of the weakened virus.
Chumakov’s brother, a leading researcher and head of the laboratory of the Vaccine Research and Analysis Department of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), recently told the ČEZ program the new strain could end the pandemic for good.
“It may even be good that this virus will sweep across the globe and the pandemic will end,” he said. “They do not have pneumonia, they recover in two to three days..”
This narrative coincides with a take by Ph.D. research scientist Dr. Houman Hemmati, who told Fox News last week that a weak Covid strain that is highly transmissible could help us get past the pandemic.
“All of a sudden, you can have a scenario where you have a large subset of the population, if not the entire population, who has gotten a mild version or even no version of the disease, but has developed antibodies and has resistance such that if there ever, later on, comes a more deadly variant, you’re protected,” he explained.
Meanwhile, other headlines covering Omicron claim the variant could combine with the Delta strain to form a super-mutant variant.
On Tuesday, the Chief Medical Officer of Moderna, Dr. Paul Burton, warned British politicians that Omicron and Delta may strike people at the same time, creating a super variant in the next few months.
Time will tell whether the seemingly manmade variant was released by “the good guys,” or if it was just another catalyst of the Great Reset.”
Let us not forget that the lab origin of Covid is now gaining acceptance even among the establishment since the bs has eventually been seen through.
https://summit.news/2021/12/15/mps-told-covid-likely-engineered-in-wuhan-lab/
"MPs have been told by experts that a Wuhan lab leak is now “the most likely” origin of COVID-19 and that there’s also a high risk it “was an engineered virus.”
The Telegraph reports on the comments of Dr Alina Chan, a specialist in gene therapy and cell engineering at MIT and Harvard, who was speaking to the Science and Technology Select Committee.
“I think the lab origin is more likely than not. Right now it’s not safe for people who know about the origin of the pandemic to come forward. But we live in an era where there is so much information being stored that it will eventually come out,” said Dr. Chan.
“We have heard from many top virologists that a genetically engineered origin is reasonable and that includes virologists who made modifications to the first Sars virus,” she added.
“We know this virus has a unique feature, called the furin cleavage site, and without this feature there is no way this would be causing this pandemic.”
“A proposal was leaked showing that EcoHealth and the Wuhan Institute of Virology were developing a pipeline for inserting novel furin cleavage sites. So, you find these scientists who said in early 2018 ‘I’m going to put horns on horses’ and at the end of 2019 a unicorn turns up in Wuhan city.”
Lord Ridley, who co-wrote a book with Chan, also said it was “incredibly surprising” that after nearly two years “we still haven’t found a single infected animal that could be the progenitor.”
Viscount Ridley called on “bad actors” who think “that unleashing a pandemic is something they could get away with,” to be exposed.
The fact that the source of COVID-19 is now likely to have been the Wuhan lab is quite the turnaround from last year, when mere discussion of this possibility was branded a ludicrous “conspiracy theory” and people who circulated it were banned from social media.
As we previously highlighted, Dr. Peter Daszak, President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, thanked Dr. Anthony Fauci for dismissing the lab leak theory early on in the pandemic.
Daszak was also tasked by Facebook with ‘fact-checking’ (censoring) information related to the hypothesis, while Google, which via YouTube also censored information about the theory, also funded Daszak’s virus research.”
“On Dec 9, 2021, Taiwan announced that a researcher working in a Biosafety-level 3 (BSL-3) laboratory in Taipei had tested positive for the Delta variant of COVID-19 “while experimenting on the virus in the lab.” Chen Shih-chung, the head of Taiwan’s Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) confirmed that the female researcher had tested positive for COVID-19 after being “exposed to the pathogen” during research that was conducted in mid-November at the Academia Sinica’s Genomics Research Center in Taipei.
Notably, Taiwan has not experienced any recent cases of COVID-19, a fact noted by Chen who said, “We believe the possibility of infection from the workplace is higher because we have zero confirmed infections in the community.”
It was later reported that the researcher had been bitten by a mouse during two separate incidents. Taipei’s deputy mayor Huang Shan-shan, who described the woman as a “research assistant,” said that she had been bitten by a laboratory mouse carrying the Gamma strain of the virus on Oct. 15, but subsequently tested negative for infection.
However, a little more than a month later on Nov. 19, she was again bitten by a mouse in the lab. This time, for reasons that remain unknown, the researcher did not undergo testing after the second bite until well after she had developed physical symptoms. According to Taiwan News, the woman developed a cough in late November, which intensified during the first week of December, but she did not seek out testing until Dec. 8.
James Liao, the president of Academia Sinica, cited six separate failures that contributed to the infection incident. These included the “failure to duly report a scientist being bitten by lab mice; not working with lab mice in a biosafety cabinet; not following protocols in removing hazmat suits; new personnel not receiving adequate training; lack of supervision and monitoring during experiments; and lax management in lab practices.”
Taiwan’s lab leak of COVID-19 took place at a BSL-3 lab, which mandates the use of personal protective equipment, biosafety cabinets, sustained directional airflow without recirculation, as well as self-closing and interlocked doors. By contrast, the gain-of-function experiments being conducted on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were done at much less secure BSL-2 labs.
As context, Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright has stated: “BSL-2 is the biosafety level of a US dentist’s office (i.e., lockable door, screened windows, sterilizer, gown, and gloves).” Ebright told the Financial Times: “If [coronavirus] work was happening, it should definitely not have been happening at BSL-2, that is roughly equivalent to a standard dentist office.”
The use of BSL-2 labs for gain-of-function experiments by the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been heavily criticized by many scientists. Michael Lin, a bioengineer at Stanford University, told MIT Technology Review that allowing work on potentially dangerous bat viruses at BSL-2 is “an actual scandal.”
And a prominent and early supporter of the natural origins narrative, Columbia University virologist Ian Lipkin, changed his mind about the virus’s origin after the Wuhan Institute admitted it conducted its coronavirus experiments at a BSL-2 lab.
“It shouldn’t have happened,” Lipkin stated. “People should not be looking at bat viruses in BSL-2 labs.”
Lipkin said that he now considers a lab leak to be a viable theory, saying that his “view has changed.”
Taiwan Leak Response Stands in Stark Contrast to CCP’s Wuhan Response
Additionally, the open and immediate manner in which the Taiwanese government handled its lab leak incident contrasts sharply with China’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials refused to acknowledge the outbreak until Taiwan notified international authorities on Dec. 31, 2019. But despite the CCP’s refusal to acknowledge an outbreak, there were earlier warnings from those stationed in Wuhan.
According to the U.S. Consul General in Wuhan, the city was hit by an unusually vicious flu-like outbreak in October 2019. And a November 2019 intelligence report by the U.S. military’s National Center for Medical Intelligence reportedly warned of a contagion and stated that “it could be a cataclysmic event.” Chinese authorities have reportedly traced early cases of COVID-19 to mid-November.”
Comments