Why isn’t Abortion a Social Construction, Too? By James Reed
I was going to say it, but Mike Adams got in first, so priority, please! As we have been covering, the gender agenda with transgenders, as in sports, has been taking the line that sex and gender are social constructions. So, why not apply this to abortion, and the whole idea of “a woman’s right”? What is a “woman”? And what is an “abortion” in the world of pure sociology? Surely if the right to abortion, whatever that is, is said not to exist, then in the world of sociology, it does not?
“It’s almost too hilarious to cover in a serious tone. The same radical left-wing nutjobs who have been screaming for the last two years about how there’s “no such thing as a woman” while demanding biological men should have access to women’s sports, women’s locker rooms and women’s public restrooms, are all suddenly now claiming “women’s rights” must be respected by all.
When the Left wants to mass murder babies, suddenly “women” count again. You know why? Because it would sound totally stupid to claim to be fighting for “abortion rights for men.”
Even though that’s exactly what the Left believes… that MEN might need abortions, too. So they use “women” as a kind of human shield to justify the carrying out of medical violence against infants and unborn children.
The Left’s utterly incoherent ramblings on biology completely discredit any argument they have about “women” or abortion
The shrieking, howling and sheer stupidity of the Left has become utterly incoherent. No one can make sense of any of it, including themselves. What was once a movement of people who protested against war, Big Pharma, Monsanto and censorship has now become the party of shrieking lunatics who demand the silencing of their political opposition, the mandatory shoving of Big Pharma’s vaccines into everyone’s bodies, and the unfettered “right” to mass murder their own babies at will… even after they’re born alive! (Post-birth abortions, now legal in several US states.)
It all begs the obvious question: If biology isn’t real, then why can’t pregnant Democrats simply “self-identify” as people who are no longer pregnant? Why do they need access to actual abortion services at all? I mean, these are the same people who have infested medical schools with “woke” delusions like teaching young doctors to provide a cervix examination to biological men who are pretending to be women.
To the “woke” morons, you see, everything is imaginary except murdering babies. That’s real, and that’s demanded. They can’t just pretend to have killed their baby, they actually want to carry out the act and celebrate it. That’s because many of them are Satanists and demon-infested, anti-human monsters who are all-in on grooming the children they haven’t killed first. They revel in the repeated killing of their own unborn children, and their access to abortion has become their dark, demonic religion.”
Comments