WHO Changes its Mind, Again By Brian Simpson
The World Health Organization does not seem to be able to make up its mind, except where China is involved, who makes up the mind of WHO for it. It looks like lockdowns are now out of favour, but tell that to dictator Dan. Oh well, the lockdowns have served their New World Order purpose.
“In a stunning rebuke of the "science" and the "doctors" and leftist politicians and career bureaucrats in the US and across much of The West, The Epoch Times' Evan Pentchoukov reports that The World Health Organization’s special envoy on COVID-19 has urged world leaders to stop using lockdowns as the primary control method against the spread of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus. “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” David Nabarro told The Spectator in an interview aired on Oct. 8. “The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.” Nabarro pointed to the collateral damage that lockdowns are having worldwide, especially among poorer populations. “Just look at what’s happened to the tourism industry, for example in the Caribbean or in the Pacific, because people aren’t taking their holidays. Look what’s happened to smallholder farmers all over the world because their markets have got dented. Look what’s happening to poverty levels. It seems that we may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year. Seems that we may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition because children are not getting meals at school and their parents, in poor families, are not able to afford it,” Nabarro said. “This is a terrible, ghastly global catastrophe actually,” he added. “And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: Stop using lockdown as your primary control method, develop better systems for doing it, work together and learn from each other, but remember - lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.”
The lockdowns have served their purpose of terrorising the normies into passive conformity and compliance. If your bowel movements can be rigidly controlled, then freedom has ended. Hell, you don’t need humans any more and can roll out the AI future, as people like George Soros upload into the cyber-systems and become immortal. But, when one becomes a series of 1s and 0s, does power have much meaning? Would one rather just bath in a sea of:
I could not see any human meaning there.