Unusual White Fibrous Clots in Embalmed Bodies: A Multi-Year Embalmer Survey and the Lingering Questions Around COVID-19 Vaccines
A new peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science has formalised reports that embalmers have raised for years: the appearance of anomalous white, rubbery, fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of deceased individuals. Led by retired U.S. Air Force Major and data analyst Thomas F. Haviland, along with colleagues, the research aggregates responses from 808 embalmers across the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand over four survey years (2022–2025).
Key Findings from the Survey
75.2% of participating embalmers reported observing these white fibrous clots.
They were estimated to appear in 23.4% of embalmed corpses overall.
Descriptions: White or off-white, tough, rubbery, often several inches to over a foot long. They obstruct blood vessels, interfere with embalming fluid distribution, and differ markedly from typical postmortem "chicken-fat" or "currant-jelly" clots.
Timing: A marked increase noted starting in 2020, accelerating sharply in 2021, precisely overlapping with the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.
A companion laboratory analysis of samples used Raman micro-spectroscopy, protein quantification, and amino-acid profiling. Researchers identified atypical protein aggregates with evidence of progression from α-helical to β-sheet-enriched configurations, consistent with abnormal protein aggregation processes (potentially amyloid-like, though more research is needed for definitive classification). These are distinct from conventional postmortem thrombi.
This builds on prior work, including a study finding amyloid microclots in 100% of vaccinated participants tested (including "healthy controls"), where purified spike protein was shown to induce fibrinolysis-resistant amyloid aggregates.
The temporal correlation: unusual clots emerging and surging alongside mass vaccination campaigns, has led many observers, including embalmers, researchers in this space, and commentators, to point to COVID-19 mRNA and viral vector vaccines as a plausible contributing factor.
Biological Plausibility Arguments:
mRNA vaccines instruct cells to produce SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which some research suggests can promote protein misfolding or aggregation.
Spike protein has been implicated in endothelial damage, inflammation, and microclot formation in various studies (independent of infection).
Amyloid-like structures and impaired fibrinolysis (clot breakdown) have been hypothesised as downstream effects.
The timing aligns: pre-2020 reports were rarer; post-rollout surges match billions of doses administered.
Embalmers' anecdotal reports predate formal studies, and the multi-country consistency adds weight to the phenomenon being real, even if causation remains unproven. Critics of the vaccines argue this fits a pattern of under-acknowledged adverse events, excess mortality signals in some datasets, and biological mechanisms (e.g., spike persistence, immune dysregulation) that warrant urgent investigation rather than dismissal.
Mainstream health authorities and fact-checkers maintain there is no established causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and widespread unusual clotting or "turbo cancers" (a related but separate claim often discussed alongside excess mortality and rapid-onset cancers). Of course they would say that.
However, the refusal by some institutions to thoroughly investigate these specific fibrous structures, despite consistent reports from frontline embalmers, fuels scepticism. Historical precedents (e.g., early dismissal of vaccine side effects later acknowledged) underscore the importance of open inquiry over Big Pharma narrative protection.
If these white fibrous clots represent a novel pathology tied to widespread interventions like COVID vaccines, the public health ramifications are enormous: potential contributions to sudden deaths, cardiovascular issues, or other systemic effects. Even without definitive causation, the data demands:
Independent, large-scale autopsies and proteomic analyses.
Transparent comparison of pre-2020 vs. post-2020 embalming records.
Studies on spike protein persistence, protein aggregation mechanisms, and interactions with human biology.
Honest risk-benefit reassessment, especially for boosters in low-risk groups.
This study does not "prove" vaccine causation, but it documents a real phenomenon that emerged in lockstep with a novel medical intervention deployed at unprecedented scale. Dismissing it outright risks repeating past mistakes of prioritising consensus over evidence. Embalmers, the professionals literally handling the downstream consequences, deserve to be heard, not marginalised.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-multi-year-study-of-808
