Ukraine Refugees are White and the Left Does Not like Any Slow Down of the Great Replacement! By Charles Taylor (Florida)

The West elites are facing a philosophical crisis now, as refugeeism was previously fuelled by non-whites, mostly males, and this was prefect for the Great Replacement program of white genocide. However, the Ukraine refugees, apart from Africans sneaking in under the same guise, are white, and female. That’s a nasty problem for the elites since the rebirth of a threatened population could come from that alone. No doubt admitting these refugees will be made only if the open door of third world migration is even wider, to demographically cancel them, for immigration now, is just another word for white eliminationism.

 

https://vdare.com/articles/u-s-ruling-class-reluctant-to-accept-ukrainian-refugees-except-to-enable-increased-third-world-influx

“The West faces a rare situation: Millions of white refugees are requesting asylum. Almost 3 million Ukrainians have left their war-ravaged country and many more are expected to follow. Western countries have opened their borders, of course [How many refugees have fled Ukraine and where are they going?, BBC, March 14, 2022]. But the anti-white American Ruling Class is visibly reluctant— unless it can use Ukrainian refugees to leverage more immigration from the Third World to hasten the Great Replacement. They’ve done it before.

A little history. In 1986, the late but not lamented Senator Ted Kennedy and white ethnic politicians concocted the “diversity lottery” to keep illegal-alien Irish in the country because the Simpson-Mazzoli Amnesty that year applied mostly to Mexicans. The lottery did bring in more Irish, but it quickly became a means to bring in more Third World immigrants as well.

Treason Lobbyists also created a special policy for Haitian “refugees” because, of course, we had to treat them the same way we treated Cuban refugees [U.S. Immigration Policy on Haitian Migrants, by Ruth Ellen Wasem, Congressional Research Service, March 31, 2010]. Thus do we now have Cuban Haitian Entrant Program.

Now The Great Replacers would use Ukrainians as a stalking horse to continue the browning of America.

Eastern Europe is taking the most refugees from Ukraine: Poland has welcomed some 1.7 million already. But Western Europe is willing to import them, too. The European Union says that its member states must and will take in the millions [How European response to Ukraine refugees differs from UK, by Kaamil Ahmed et al., The Guardian, March 11, 2022]. Some numbers:

  • Germany: 80,000; waived border restrictions to accept more;
  • France: 75,000, will take plus 100,000 more; and
  • Italy: 20,000, will accept another 800,000.

Sweden will take 76,000 [Sweden expects 76,000 Ukrainian refugees in coming monthsReuters, March 11, 2022].

Even more generously, Canada, which has a strong Ukrainian immigrant presence, has pledged to accept an unlimited number of refugees [Trudeau: Canada will take as many Ukraine refugees as it can, The Associated Press, March 11, 2022]. Australia will accept them, too [Ukrainians could arrive in Australia from this weekend with government issuing 1,000 visas, by James Glenday, ABC, March 2, 2022].

But it’s what happens here is what matters to the Historic American Nation, which is why the current push to get Ukrainians into the country is so concerning. President Biden has said that America will welcome Ukrainians, but hasn’t yet formulated a plan [Will the U.S. receive Ukrainian refugees?, by Camilo Montoya-Galvez, CBS News, March 11, 2022]. The Department of Homeland Security granted Ukrainians here Temporary Protected Status, and Congress passed a bill that would send $1 billion to aid Ukrainian refugees in Europe [Congress passes $13.6 billion in Ukraine aid along with government funding, by Kelly Snell, NPR, March 10, 2022].

And make no mistake, Ukrainians are itching to get here. A surge of Ukrainian and Russian “migrants” has already hit the U.S.-Mexico border [Ukrainian refugees arriving at the US-Mexico border raise questions for Biden, by Marcela Garcia, Boston Globe, March 14, 2022].

All that is where using Ukrainians to leverage more Third World immigration comes in.

The Treason Lobby is using that border surge to press Two Scoops Biden to eliminate what remains of border security. Leftists are anxious to scrap President Trump’s implementation of Title 42, which permits expedited deportations of illegal aliens for health reasons—in the present case, the China Virus. “This is not who we are as a country,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said last week. “Continuing this Trump era policy has defied common sense and common decency. Now's the time to stop the madness” [Pressure to end pandemic restrictions mounts as Ukrainians reach the U.S. border, by Joel Rose, NPR, March 12, 2022].

The “madness” would be scrapping Title 42, but in any case, a message for immigration patriots: Be worried!

Frighteningly, Americans have apparently been stampeded to agreeing to accept Ukrainians. One poll found that 75 percent support this move [Three-quarters of Americans support the U.S. taking in Ukrainian refugees, Ipsos, March 4, 2022]. But by a large margin, more Americans support welcoming refugees from Ukraine than from the Middle East or Latin America. Leftists, unsurprisingly, claim the bias “rooted in racism” [Americans More Accepting of Refugees From Ukraine Than Middle East, Central America, New Data Finds, by Maura Hohman and Noah Pransky, Lx, March 11, 2022].

Thus, while the Regime Media insists they #StandWithUkraine, they bellyache that the same sympathy is not offered to non-white migrants:

  • CNN:

When Denmark became the first liberal democracy to tell Syrian refugees to return to their war-torn home in 2019, Russian jets were still dropping missiles in Syria, in an effort to help President Bashar al-Assad's regime regain control of the country. Ukraine is now being pummeled by the same Russian military, forcing more than 2.2 million people to flee to neighboring countries, according to the United Nations. But instead of being met by xenophobia, detention centers and threats of repatriation in the European Union, Ukrainian refugees are being welcomed by European nations like Denmark with open arms.

[Denmark opens its arms to Ukrainians, while trying to send Syrian refugees home, by Tara John, CNN, March 10, 2022].

 

  • MSNBC host Joy Reid:

Let’s face it, the world is paying attention because this is happening in Europe. If this was happening anywhere else would we see the same outpouring of support and compassion? We don’t need to ask ourselves if the international response would be the same if Russia unleashed their horror on a country that wasn't White and largely Christian, because Russia has already done it. In Syria

[MSNBC Anchor Says World Cares About Ukraine Because It Is White, Christian, by Chris Enloe, The Blaze, March 8, 2022] 

  • Newsweek:

Many living in invaded and destroyed regions of the Middle East, South Asia and North and East Africa see the inconsistencies. They see the public, policymakers, and the press in the West rushing to the aid of a largely white Christian nation in ways unseen in their respective, largely Black and brown populations and communities. To them it seems like the West is apparently only capable of empathy with its own identity and type.

 [We Care More About Ukraine Because the Victims Are White, by Michael Shank, March 3, 2022]

  • Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez:

I think the world is watching and many immigrants and refugees are watching, and how the world treats Ukraine and Ukrainian refugees should be how we are treating all refugees in the United States.

 [AOC says US should be treating all refugees the way the world is treating Ukrainian refugees, by Sarah al-Arshani, Business Insider, March 1, 2022]

  • CBS host Gayle King:

You look at people coming from Haiti, people coming, as I said, El Salvador, Honduras. They were not treated this well. I think we all want the Ukrainian people to be helped, everybody agrees with that, but there is enough pain to go around here.  

[CBS’ Gayle King contrasts treatment of Ukrainian refugees to migrants at US border, by Hanna Panreck, Fox News, March 9, 2022]

We’re already seeing climate refugees around the world. … If you think migration has been a problem in Europe in the Syrian War or even from what we see now [from Ukraine], wait until you see 100 million people for whom the entire food production capacity has collapsed.

[Kerry: Ukraine crisis is bad, but ‘wait until you see’ flood of climate refugees, by Jessica Chasmar, Fox News, March 9, 2022].

They must’ve forgotten all the “Refugees Welcome” signs from 2015!

Thus will the exodus from Ukraine be used to browbeat Europeans and Americans into accepting an equal number of “migrants” from the Third World, and perhaps even more. It’s just downright unfair to import all those whites and exclude “people of color.” As for this country, Leftists know that accepting a significant number of white refugees without adding POCs will delay the Great Replacement.

And remember this: The Biden Regime plans to double refugee admission to 125,000 this year, almost 10 times more than POTUS 45 Trump’s last year in office [Biden administration plans to double US refugee admissions to 125,000 in 2022, France 24, September 21, 2021]. Biden might just decide to boost that number further and offer Ukrainians as the reason. And again, that could happen with Temporary Protected Status. Any nationality could benefit from either of those moves thanks to Ukrainians.

The one upside to the Ukrainian surge: it will offset at least some non-white immigration. Many Ukrainians could be conservatives—many even religious conservatives—who won’t be automatic Democrat voters.

Don’t think the Democrats don’t know that.

Bottom line: Elected Republicans better be ready to oppose any effort to use an influx of Ukrainians to mask a massive increase of immigration from the Third World.”

In any case, turning to Europe, a third of Ukrainian refugees are from other countries, so in the end, whites never escape the immigration strangler hold.

 

https://summit.news/2022/03/15/30-per-cent-of-ukrainian-refugees-are-actually-from-other-countries/

 

“Around a third of Ukrainian refugees arriving in France are actually economic migrants from other areas of the world, mostly North Africa and the Middle East, according to an investigation by newspaper Le Figaro.

Over 5,000 refugees have already arrived in France from Ukraine, with some being transported by bus from Berlin and others arriving by rail and air.

“However, many of those arriving through official channels and being identified by the authorities are non-Ukrainian, with Le Figaro reporting that as many as 30 percent are migrants of other nationalities,” reports ReMix News.

“The newspaper reveals that 7.5 percent are of Algerian nationality, while 3.5 percent of arrivals are from the Ivory Coast and Morocco respectively.”

Indians and Kyrgyzstan nationals also represent a chunk of the fake refugees, in addition to migrants from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon, Pakistan, Nigeria, and China, who are all falsely claiming to be Ukrainian.

The incentive for economic migrants to obtain asylum in France by pretending to be Ukrainian is clear given that they are given immediate blanket refugee status, guaranteed accommodation, as well as educational, financial and medical support.

Despite his usually staunch opposition to immigration, presidential candidate Éric Zemmour said Ukrainians with family ties in France should be allowed in.

“There are people who are like us and people who [are] unlike us,” the populist told BFM TV. “Everybody now understands that Arab or Muslim immigrants are too unlike us and that it is harder and harder to integrate them.”

The research again highlights the opportunism and cynicism of economic migrants who will piggy back off the suffering of genuine refugees to reach the west.

The numbers are sure to cause concerns amongst people considering opening up their homes to Ukrainian refugees in western countries such as the United Kingdom.

According to an Observer poll, 9 per cent of Brits would “definitely” invite a refugee to stay in their home, while 20 per cent say they might.

How many of those people are just performatively virtue signaling and don’t actually plan on taking in any refugees at all is probably quite a high number.

During the 2015-16 refugee crisis, innumerable celebrities in the UK vowed to take in refugees, yet virtually none of them actually followed through.

 

As we highlighted earlier, the Sweden Democrats have proposed helping genuine Ukrainian refugees by temporarily banning asylum claims filed by those coming from different countries.”

 

 

 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Friday, 17 May 2024

Captcha Image