UK Zero Net Tyranny Now “Law,” By Richard Miller (Europe)
Actionist David Smith has written about the threat posed by the UK's Climate and Nature Bill, set to become law. As Smith writes, for circulation: "A parliamentary bill is set to write Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil-type extreme Net Zero demands into UK law.
Supporters of the Climate and Nature ("CAN") Bill are claiming that "the people have spoken and now everyone needs to act." They are claiming a public mandate when none exists.
The CAN Bill's climate targets are so unrealistic, unachievable and unscientific that it equates to King Canute-like absurdity. Yet it is on track to become UK law, and next to no one knows about it.
The Bill will require by law that the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero – CAN Bill supporter Ed Miliband – must rapidly achieve Net Zero, stop natural fuel use, close businesses or activities with high CO2 emissions, and retrain those put out of work.
Freedoms will be swept away on the altar of achieving Net Zero.
The CAN Bill makes the assumption that man-made climate change is agreed scientific consensus when this is absolutely not the case.
Dr. Roz Savage MBE, MP and promoter of the CAN Bill, said: "My Climate And Nature Bill will lock the science into law."
So MPs don't need to assess the science and hear all views, but have just one side of the debate around climate change presented to them.
This is contrary to the Nolan Principles of Public Life that bind MPs to avoid such bias and predetermination in public affairs.
There is also bias and predetermination by omission in the "science" around nature recovery.
For example, a study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, part of the US Department of Commerce, reports that human-caused CO2 has resulted in significant re-greening and is starting to rectify the current depleted CO2 levels which are far below optimum for nature and plant growth.
The Climate and Nature Private Members' Bill (and anything like it) must be challenged by us all and with utmost vigour."
The law will impact upon all aspects of British society, and essentially legislates in Agenda 2030 proposals, and goes even beyond this. The Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, is required to achieve Net Zero emissions "as rapidly as possible," which means a total movement away from the use of fossil fuels, and oil exploration.
The law will also continue the assault that climate change alarmists have made upon traditional agriculture, with the requirement of vast areas of land taken from farming and return to "nature," rewilding.
The Bill is not yet law, but the UK people need to get busy to have a chance of stopping this one.
"The climate change cult are taking over the UK. After years of insane proposals, the UK's Climate and Nature (CAN) Bill is poised to become law, embedding extreme Net Zero demands into the nation's legal framework. Spearheaded by supporters like Labour MP Ed Miliband and promoted by figures such as Dr. Roz Savage MBE, the Bill mandates rapid decarbonization, the phasing out of natural fuels, and sweeping changes to agriculture and industry. Scheduled for its second reading on January 24, 2025, the Bill has quietly gained significant parliamentary support, despite concerns about its feasibility, scientific basis, and potential to upend traditional ways of life. With its roots in campaigns like Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil, the CAN Bill represents a radical shift in policy—one that critics argue threatens not only energy security and food production but also fundamental freedoms.
The CAN Bill's objectives are truly transformative. It requires the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero to achieve Net Zero emissions "as rapidly as possible," effectively ending the exploration, extraction, and use of oil, coal, and gas. Industries deemed high-emission would face closure, with workers retrained for "green" jobs. The Bill also mandates the creation of a Climate and Nature Assembly, tasked with recommending measures to achieve these goals. However, critics argue that the Assembly's independence is questionable, as its "expert advice" is likely to be cherry-picked to align with the Bill's preordained outcomes.
Dr. Roz Savage, a prominent supporter of the Bill, has framed it as a necessary step to "lock the science into law." Yet, this very assertion has drawn sharp criticism. Opponents argue that the Bill assumes a scientific consensus on man-made climate change that does not exist.
One of the most contentious aspects of the CAN Bill is its emphasis on "rewilding" and nature recovery. The Bill could require large swathes of farmland to be converted back to wilderness, reducing domestic food production at a time when global supply chains are already strained. Combined with the phasing out of natural fuel-powered shipping, this could lead to food shortages, rationing, and even starvation, critics warn.
Moreover, the Bill's focus on "ecosystem recovery" could result in authorities shutting off vast areas of countryside, confining people to cities and controlled communities. "This isn't just about climate change; it's about control," said one farmer. "They're taking away our land, our livelihoods, and our freedom—all in the name of saving the planet."
A flawed process and a dangerous precedent
The CAN Bill's path to becoming law has been marked by a lack of transparency and public debate. Despite its far-reaching implications, the Bill has garnered little media attention, and many MPs appear unaware of its details. The Zero Hour campaign, which backs the Bill, has been accused of using alarmist propaganda to sway lawmakers. Its website features images of "Extinction Rebellion protests" and lists an impressive array of supporters, including 188 MPs, 54 Peers, and 799 organizations. However, critics argue that this support is built on a foundation of biased information and fear-mongering.
"The Zero Hour campaign is marking its own homework," said one parliamentary insider. "They're presenting MPs with a one-sided narrative and expecting them to fall in line. It's a dangerous precedent for how policy is made in this country."
As the CAN Bill moves closer to becoming law, its implications are becoming increasingly clear. For supporters, it represents a bold and necessary response to an alleged "climate crisis." For those who understand the propaganda, this law represents a radical and reckless overhaul of energy, farming, and freedom—one that threatens to upend the lives of millions. The Bill's reliance on alarmist narratives, its bypassing of genuine scientific debate, and its potential to cause widespread disruption have sparked a growing backlash. Yet, with its second reading fast approaching, time is running out for those who wish to challenge it.
https://expose-news.com/2025/01/12/bill-will-write-extreme-demands-into-law/
Comments