TWO Years to Save the Planet? What Happened to the “10 Years” Nonsense? By James Reed
In past Alor.org blog pieces, I have satirised the climate change alarmists, who have pressed the panic button, saying that there is only ten years to save the planet from climate change. My point has been they have been saying this for years, and never deducting any years from the ten years doomsday number. But now I will have to drop that line, since one globalist has been counting, United Nations executive climate secretary Simon Stiell. Yes, now there is only two years left to save the planet from climate change! That's right, TWO years, and even less time to get the West to cough up the trillions needed to do this, and radically deindustrialise, but not communist China of course, which is beyond criticism, being communist and non-White.
The extract from Fox News below covers the mainstream idea that the carbon dioxide levels of the world are growing, that temperatures are rising and so on. All these points have been challenged and coverage of the alternative scientific news has been reported faithfully at the Alor.org blog, since this issue has enormous pubic policy implications, as our entire way of life will be up for grabs. However, the point I make to the claim that there is only two years to save the planet, is if, and that is a hypothetical IF, it is assumed to be true for the sake of refuting the position, there is utterly no hope of saving the planet, on their assumptions, not ours. Not much could be done in that time, and with wars erupting everywhere, worrying about carbon dioxide will soon be the least of our worries; think in terms of radioactive fallout from nuclear exchanges.
So, the entire climate change alarmist narrative comes to its illogical conclusion, as it self-destructs!
"Humanity has only two years left "to save the world" by making dramatic changes in the way it spews heat-trapping emissions and it has even less time to act to get the finances behind such a massive shift, the head of the United Nations climate agency said.
With governments of the world facing a 2025 deadline for new and stronger plans to curb carbon pollution, nearly half of the world's populations voting in elections this year, and crucial global finance meetings later this month in Washington, United Nations executive climate secretary Simon Stiell said Wednesday he knows his warning may sound melodramatic. But he said action over the next two years is "essential."
"We still have a chance to make greenhouse gas emissions tumble, with a new generation of national climate plans. But we need these stronger plans, now," Stiell said in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London. He suggested that climate action is not just for powerful people to address — in a not-so-veiled reference to the electoral calendar this year.
"Who exactly has two years to save the world? The answer is every person on this planet," Stiell said. "More and more people want climate action right across societies and political spectrums, in large part because they are feeling the impacts of the climate crisis in their everyday lives and their household budgets."
Crop-destroying droughts have increased the need for bolder action to curb emissions and help farmers adapt which could boost food security and lessen hunger, he said. "Cutting fossil fuel pollution will mean better health and huge savings for governments and households alike," Stiell said.
Not everyone is convinced such warnings will be helpful.
"'Two years to save the world' is meaningless rhetoric — at best, it's likely to be ignored, at worst, it will be counterproductive," said Princeton University climate scientist Michael Oppenheimer, who is also a professor of international affairs.
Levels of carbon dioxide and methane in the air last year hit all-time highs, according to United States government calculations, while scientists calculate that the world's carbon dioxide emissions jumped 1.1%. Last year was the hottest year on record by far, global temperature monitoring groups concluded.
If emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from burning of coal, oil and natural gas continue to rise or don't start a sharp decline, Stiell said it "will further entrench the gross inequalities between the world's richest and poorest countries and communities" that are being worsened by climate change.
And behind it all is money.
Stiell's speech comes just ahead of meetings of The World Bank and other big multinational development institutions, where poorer nations, led by Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley and Kenyan President William Ruto, are pushing for major reforms in the systems that loan money to poor nations, especially those hit by climate-related disasters.
In conjunction with that push, Stiell called for "a quantum leap this year in climate finance." He called for debt relief for the countries that need it the most, saying they are spending $400 billion on debt financing instead of preparing for and preventing future climate change.
He called for more financial aid, not just loans, and more money from different groups like banks, the International Maritime Organization, and the G20, the world's 20 most powerful economies. Those countries are responsible for 80% of the world's heat-trapping emissions, he said.
"G20 leadership must be at the core of the solution, as it was during the great financial crisis," Stiell said.
"Every day, finance ministers, CEOs, investors, and development bankers direct trillions of dollars. It's time to shift those dollars from the energy and infrastructure of the past, towards that of a cleaner, more resilient future," Stiell said. "And to ensure that the poorest and most vulnerable countries benefit."
Officials said the climate finance problem needs to be fixed by the end of the year with November's climate negotiations in Baku, Azerbaijan, a crucial point.
Stiell is "absolutely right" that timing and finance are the heart of the matter, said longtime climate analyst Alden Meyer of European think tank E3G. The carbon action plans submitted by next year will "determine whether we can get on the trajectory of sharp emissions reductions needed to avoid much worse climate impacts than those we are already suffering today," he said.
With so many elections and places where democracies on the brink, "climate finance related to carbon policy is on the line," said Nancy Lindborg, president of the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, at the Skoll World Forum, an ideas conference in Oxford, England.
Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare said Stiell was "listening to the science" — namely that global emissions must be halved by the end of the decade to meet the Paris climate accord's ambition of capping global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit).
"Governments are nowhere near that, and disastrously many are still supporting new fossil fuel development," Hare said. "We need to see a massive strengthening of action now – faster ramping up of renewables, electric vehicles and batteries – if we're to get serious reductions by 2030. The longer we wait, the more it will cost."
Comments