Transgender, Multicultural Vikings? Refuting Pseudoscience Parts I, II, and III By Brian Simpson Part I
Professor Ricardo Duchesne, in his paper, “Deceptive Use of Scientific Data to Promote Ethnocide of Europeans,” 9 October, 26, 2017):
http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/deceptive-use-scientific-data-to-promote-ethnocide-europeans.html
notes that cultural Marxism has now deeply penetrated into the core of the somewhat harder sciences, having infected the flaccid sciences such as anthropology and sociology. The fields of population genetics, archaeology, paleogenetics, and evolutionary biology, are becoming as “woke” as those soft “sciences,” as the foul winds of political correctness blow over an already arid academe. The aim of this penetration of intellectual corruption, whether the useful academic idiots are aware of it or not, is to aid globalist programs such as the “Great Reset,” and the “Great Replacement.”
Professor Duchesne goes into greater detail than possible here, debunking the idea that the once hard sciences show that “there is no such thing as a European,” because these people had a diverse origin over long time periods, from a mixture of multiple migrations. Of course, there is no such thing as an African or an Asian by the same argument, a conclusion which is never drawn by the woke. Likewise the same vagueness argument can be applied to animal and plant species, as well, leading to a type of biological nihilism. But in any case, these scientists reveal very easily their political agenda, with statements like, Europeans have “no unique genetic heritage to protect,” if not openly obsessing about neo-Nazis and White nationalists. As Duchesne asks: “Why are these scientists trying to persuade Europeans that they don’t have an identity “to protect” in the face of mass immigration today?” Cultural Marxism wagging the tail of the globalist Godzilla, of course.
The genetic evidence, steam cleaned from the filth of Marxist ideology, shows that Europeans, although having some initial genetic intermixture, primarily evolved in Europe to form an identifiable White race, dividable into ethnic groups. The strawman of a “pure race” is raised to throw the death by Nazi thing around, but there are no “pure” races, or “pure” anything, on the planet. As I said, this demand would lead to all vague objects being rejected, including all ordinary size material objects: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2215000?seq=1. Clearly, degrees of mixture matter. A glass of 99.99 percent water, and 0.01 percent other matter, would still be a glass of water. The anti-racist argument, taken to its “logical” conclusion, would show that there are no “natural kinds” in the world, making much of science impossible: R. Harre and E. H. Madden, Causal Powers, (Blackwell, 1975). In any case, “European genetic mixture does not preclude the reality that Europeans are distinctive white people indigenous to the continent of Europe.”
It is interesting to note, that we do not see these “scientists” producing studies showing that most Asians also did not originate in the areas where they are today, and are also genetic mixtures, so, by the same arguments, must also not exist and have ethnic rights, accepting infinite migration as their fate. Thus, such “science” becomes a branch of cultural Marxism, fabricating the past, to deconstruct the present.
This deconstruction of the White past, especially of the Nordic people, is seen clearly in present attempts to show that the Vikings were gay, transgender, multicultural and multiracial, living in just the sort of globalist swamp that the elites are building today. However, if we were all multicultural, transgender, whatever, from the beginning, then this transformation process is incoherent, since it has already been done, so why over-cook things? Of course, it has not been done, hence the need for the present intellectual assault.
Transgender Vikings
Helen Buyniski “Revisionist Scholars Risk Reversing Decades of Women’s Gains When They Declare an Unearthed Viking Woman Warrior is Transgender,” August 21, 2020:
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/498703-viking-warrior-woman-transgender-misogyny/
perhaps overstates her case, since most people have never heard of the discovery of a 10th century skeleton, a high-status Viking warrior, confirmed by DNA analysis to have had two X chromosomes. One would have thought that the transgender challenge to women’s sport would be more important. But, we proceed.
Buyniski quoted Swedish archaeologist Professor Neil Price, who thought that this Viking, “may have been transgender … or non-binary, or gender fluid,” backwardly projecting today’s categories. Needless to say, there is no evidence at all for this fantasy, but that did not stop the press from spewing out headlines, like transgender Vikings, ransacked Britain over 1,000 years ago. Any bs for a headline.
Then we have the gay Viking line, which is something Hollywood will probably do a movie about, if they have not already, I don’t feel like Googling it. Amy Jefford Franks pushes the line that “Vikings were gay,” and “there were queer Vikings,” but admits that “it was not widespread.” How does she know? She has a paper, “Odinn as a Queer Deity Mediating the Warrior Halls of Viking Age Scandinavia”:
which offers no real evidence for this claim.
Buyniski recognises that Viking society had rigid gender roles, so it is not unreasonable to suppose that the woman was not a warrior, but was just buried in those clothes, which certainly has occurred before in history, as women like to dress up, and someone may have dressed up the corpse. But, even if this was a female Viking Boudica type woman, it is possible that she was an exception person, which does not prove much, since statistical randomness in the universe will ensure that.
Continued, Part II: Multicultural Vikings?
Comments