They are Going to be Gunning for J. K. Rowling By Richard Miller (London)
With Scotland's' new hyper-woke hate laws now operating, the multicult elites are going out to target people that they hate, and J. K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter books is number one on the list for her defence of traditional women, and I mean, women as biologically defined. She has fearless proclaimed that she will go to jail rather than stop her critique, and she turned up the heat by saying that a "trans woman" is not a woman just because an effort was made to look pretty. This has really stirred things up, so I expect once she returns to Scotland, she will be arrested by the thought police who cannot pursue real criminals anymore, only Whites who get out of line.
As a strategy, she could go to another country with some remaining free speech, like the US, or anywhere in the Caribbean, get a luxury house, and if there is no extradition treaty, fire away high-level attacks on all this woke nonsense.
"JK Rowling has asserted that a 'trans woman' still isn't a woman just because they make the effort to look like a pretty woman.
The Harry Potter author made the comments as controversy surrounding Scotland's new hate crime law continues to swirl.
Under the new legislation, anyone deemed to have been verbally 'abusive', in person or online, to a transgender person, including "insulting" them could be hit with a prison sentence of up to seven years.
The law has sparked fears that merely 'misgendering' a trans person could be an arrestable offence.
Rowling defied the new law by posting a number of images of 'trans women', most of them violent criminals and sex offenders, and challenging police to arrest her.
"If they go after any woman for simply calling a man a man, I'll repeat that woman's words and they can charge us both at once," she stated.
Earlier today, Police Scotland said her comments were not being treated as criminal.
The author got into an argument with broadcaster Albie Amankona on X after Amankona asserted Munroe Bergdorf, a biological man, should be treated as a woman just because he has made the effort with body modifications and make-up.
"Like most Brits I am sympathetic to @jk_rowling's views on biological sex & the need for single-sex provisions," he posted.
"But I suspect like me, most Brits would find calling a trans woman who looks like @munroebergdorf1 "him" to be obtuse & mean-spirited, though not a criminal offence.
Rowling vociferously disagreed.
"So if trans-identified men are pretty enough (as judged by you, a man) women ought to agree they're women?" she hit back.
"Femaleness has no relation whatsoever to how well an individual – man or woman – performs femininity to male standards. This is the very definition of misogyny."
Rowling also pointed out that Bergdorf had failed a risk assessment to be around children not because of a Playboy shoot, as claimed by her detractors, but "because Bergdorf had asked emotionally distressed children to contact him online."
Meanwhile, as we highlighted earlier, Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf has declared that the new hate crime law is justified because of graffiti about him near his home."
Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf has declared that extreme new hate crime laws that have come into effect in the country are justified because of graffiti about him near his home.
The graffiti was reportedly sprayed on three walls in Dundee, and was quickly painted over by the local council.
Yousaf posted the following on X, stating that "we must, collectively, take a zero-tolerance approach to hatred."
An SNP spokesman parroted Yousaf, noting "This graffiti was sickening and completely unacceptable, it is a reminder why we need to take a zero-tolerance approach to hatred."
The Telegraph reports that "Although offences involving stirring up racial hatred have existed since 1986, he suggested the graffiti helped make the case for his new hate crime laws."
The backlash online was immediate:
The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, which came into force yesterday, created a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex."
Comments