The Voice is Even Worse than We Thought By James Reed

Dear …

Big news.

On Thursday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed the true extent of the damage the Voice activists want to inflict on your Constitution.

And it’s far worse than we feared.

Not only do they want the divisive Voice to ride roughshod over Parliament, it would have a direct say over every decision made by the executive government.

And the Voice will have the power to challenge those decisions in the High Court.

The true gravity of what this referendum is actually about is only now starting to dawn on many Australians.

This change to the Constitution is so massive, it’s made headlines around the world.

Time Magazine called it a “profound constitutional change” which means Indigenous Australians could “gain formal representation in Parliament”¹.

Still sounding like a “modest” change?

But the funny thing is that Albo tried to talk them out of such a massive constitutional amendment.

He asked the referendum working group – made up of pro-Voice activists – to limit its power to take a democratically elected parliament or government to the High Court².

And they said no!

So what did Labor do? They folded.

They proved the ‘no’ case before the campaign even starts.

At the very first opportunity to show that the so-called Voice will not ride roughshod over the government, they folded.

Despite the internal division, despite the legal concerns, despite the community concerns, they capitulated.

It just goes to show who is in charge here.

It’s not you, me or the Australian people – the pro-Voice activists are well and truly running the table.

The Albanese government proposed an “additional set of words to guard against potential High Court challenges”, but were denied by the pro-Voice activists.

And if the rulebook of the country is changed we can only expect more of this.

Do you remember last year, when Albo said it would be a “brave government” that ignored the divisive Voice?

Well, this is exactly what he meant.

And exactly why you and I will be fighting hard to say ‘no’.

There’s no way we’re going to let the Voice divide our nation like this.

Yours in unity,

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price
on behalf of FAIR AUSTRALIA

1 Time Magazine, Australia’s Indigenous Peoples Could Finally Gain Formal Representation in Parliament, March 23, 2023.

2 The Sydney Morning Herald, The seven extra words that could broker a compromise deal and win the referendum, March 13, 2023.

It is Not Covid Causing Heart Problems: Autopsies Studies

By Brian Simpson

One of the Covid mainstream’s supposed explanations of the phenomena of people, especially young male athletes, collapsing with heart issues, is that this is an effect of the Covid infection itself. However, contrary evidence to this has been reported by R. Alanlouk (et al.), in the journal, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, though a systematic review of 50 autopsy studies and 548 hearts of patients who died of, or with, Covid-19. It was found that about two thirds of hearts had the Covid virus,  SARS-CoV-2,  in the tissue, but none of the hearts had extensive myocarditis, heart inflammation, as the cause of death. This, then, knocks over another hypothesis that the mainstream Covid elites use to protect the sacred vax from the criticism it richly deserves.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/autopsy-studies-of-covid-19-illness

“By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

From the original Baric study demonstrating beta-coronavirus loading in laboratory models can cause myocarditis to the first year of the COVID-19 crisis there has been a concern that SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans could cause heart inflammation. Epidemiologic studies relying on ICD codes triggered by routine cardiac troponin testing and or results implied that hospitalized patients were developing myocarditis with the respiratory illness. None of these studies were confirmed with clinical adjudication or autopsy. In 2020 the NCAA Big Ten athletic conference, US Military, and many other organizations screened for myocarditis on clinical grounds—handful of cases were found without any reported hospitalizations or deaths. Tuvali, et al from Israel, demonstrated that myocarditis in 2020 was not any more common that the low levels of baseline myocarditis from parvovirus, giant cell, and other conditions.

Almamlouk et al performed a systematic review of 50 autopsy studies and 548 hearts of patients who died of or with COVID-19. Usual post-mortem findings of tissue edema and necrosis were reported commonly. About two thirds of hearts had SARS-CoV-2 found in the tissue. However, none of the hearts had extensive myocarditis as the cause of death.

In summary, this review should be the nail in the coffin in ruling out COVID-19 illness as a cause of fatal myocarditis. Despite the virus being found in heart tissue, it was not causing significant inflammation. The explosion of fatal myocarditis by report of unexplained cardiac arrest, adjudication, and at necropsy must have another explanation than SARS-CoV-2 infection. The only new proven cause of heart damage in human populations is COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccines used in America (Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, Novavax) have been demonstrated to cause myocarditis as published in the peer-reviewed literature.

These observations call for immediate access to the CDC COVID-19 vaccine administration database for physicians and other providers who are managing the burgeoning caseload of myocarditis. This will be the only way the epidemiology of COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis can be studied and patient outcomes can be improved.”